Vol. 12 No. 4 (2025)
Journal Space and Culture, India

Research

Analysis of Traditional Values and Social Dynamics in Modern Society

Published 2025-03-29

  • Sergazy Kudaibergenov
    • ,
  • Zharkynbek Abikenov
    • ,
  • Makhpal Syzdykova
    • ,
  • Aigul Abdiramanova

Sergazy Kudaibergenov
PhD Scholar, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, 71 al-Farabi Ave, Almaty, 050040, Kazakhstan

Zharkynbek Abikenov
Korkyt Ata Kyzylorda State University, 29A Aitekebі Ave, Kyzylorda, 120014, Kazakhstan

Makhpal Syzdykova
Associate Professor, Candidate of Social Sciences, Korkyt Ata Kyzylorda State University, 29A Aitekebі Ave, Kyzylorda, 120014, Kazakhstan

Aigul Abdiramanova
Associate Professor, Candidate of Social Sciences, Korkyt Ata Kyzylorda State University, 29A Aitekebі Ave, Kyzylorda, 120014, Kazakhstan

Abstract

        

This research examines the perceptions of traditional values among ethnic minorities of southern Kazakhstan, the changes these values undergo, and the societal challenges and tensions associated with cultural values. It explores stable understandings of cultural values, analysing their influence on social attitudes and institutions. In doing so, the research examines the socio-economic, cultural, and institutional dimensions of traditional values, identifying key issues and mechanisms that influence their development. Additionally, it examines the influence of traditional values on the social dynamics of contemporary society, providing a nuanced understanding of their intricate interrelationships.

The study explains how traditional values shape the formation of social institutions by analysing theoretical frameworks and empirical data. A  scholarly literature review provides the theoretical basis, while empirical data were gathered through an online survey. The findings reveal a close relationship between traditional values and societal customs.

In southern Kazakhstan, traditional values are shown to strengthen social stability, even as the country undergoes transformations influenced by globalisation, technology, and media. While the younger generation embraces innovation, older generations emphasise preserving traditional practices. Although certain emerging traditions are deemed unnecessary, core traditional values are vital for reinforcing national identity.

The study concludes that preserving traditional values is essential for maintaining cultural identity and social stability while embracing modern innovations. This balanced approach fosters a resilient and harmonious society that respects its heritage while adapting to the challenges of the contemporary world.

This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the role of traditional values in modern society.

Keywords

Traditional Values, Social Dynamics, Culture, Society, Social Institutions, Social Tensions, Empirical Research, Value Transformation , Kazakhstan

pdf

Author Biography

Sergazy Kudaibergenov

PhD Scholar, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University

Zharkynbek Abikenov

Korkyt Ata Kyzylorda State University

Makhpal Syzdykova

Associate Professor

Aigul Abdiramanova

Associate Professor

References

  1. Anderson, B. (2016). Voobrazhaemye soobshchestva: Razmyshleniya ob istokakh i rasprostranenii natsionalizma. Moscow: Kuchkovo Pole.
  2. Anderson, B., Bauer, O., Khrokh, M., & Others. (2002). Nations and nationalism (L. E. Pereyaslavtseva, M. S. Panina, & M. B. Gnedovskaya, Trans.). Moscow: Praxis.
  3. Aristotle. (2019). The complete works of Aristotle, Volume One: The revised Oxford translation. BoD–Books on Demand.
  4. Baller, E. A. (1987). Sotsialnyy progress i kulturnoye naslediye. Moscow: Nauka.
  5. Beck, U. (2018). What is globalization? Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
  6. Berger, P. (2002). The cultural dynamics of globalization. In P. L. Berger & S. P. Huntington (Eds.), Many globalizations: Cultural diversity in the contemporary world (pp. 1–16). New York: Oxford University Press.
  7. Bharucha, R. (1989). Notes on the invention of tradition. Economic and Political Weekly, 24(33), 1907–1909.
  8. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.
  9. Burton, R. D. E. (2009). Globalization and cultural identity in Caribbean society: The Jamaican case. Caribbean Journal of Philosophy, 1, 1–18.
  10. Bureau of National Statistics. (2024). Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan. https://stat.gov.kz/
  11. Chistov, K. V. (2005). Folklor. Tekst. Traditsiya. Moscow: OGI.
  12. Durkheim, E. (1998). Elementarnye formy religioznoy zhizni: Totemicheskaya sistema v Avstralii (A. B. Hoffman, Trans.). Moscow: [Publisher missing].
  13. Eisenstadt, S. N. (1973). Tradition, change, and modernity.John Wiley.
  14. Eisenstadt, S. N. (1992). Frameworks of the great revolutions: Culture, social structure, history, and human agency. International Social Science Journal, 44(132), 387–401.
  15. Eisenstadt, S. N. (2004). The civilizational dimension of modernity. In S. A. Arjomand & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Rethinking civilizational analysis (pp. 1–20). Sage Publications Ltd.
  16. Eisenstadt, S. N. (2006). The great revolutions and the civilizations of modernity. Brill.
  17. Foucault, M. (1997). Istoriya bezumiya v klassicheskuyu epokhu (I. Staf, Trans.; V. Gaidamak, Ed.). Saint Petersburg: Universitetskaya Kniga.
  18. Fukuyama, F. (2014). America in decay: The sources of political dysfunction. Foreign Affairs, 93(5), 5–26.
  19. Guenon, R. (2000). Ocherki o traditsii i metafizike. Moscow: Azbuka.
  20. Handler, R. (1984). Review of the book The invention of tradition, by E. Hobsbawm & T. Ranger. American Anthropologist, 86(4), 1025–1026.https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1984.86.4.02a00380
  21. Hegel, G. W. F. (2019). Hegel’s elements of the philosophy of right: A new translation with commentary. Oxford University Press.
  22. Herder, J. G. (2024). Ideas for the philosophy of the history of mankind. Cambridge University Press.
  23. Hobsbawm, E. (2017). History after Hobsbawm: Writing the past for the twenty-first century. Cambridge University Press.
  24. Locke, J. (1998). Sochineniya: V 3 t. Moscow: Mysl.
  25. Makaryan, E. (1973). On the genesis of human activity and culture. Yerevan: Izdatelstvo AN Armyanskoy SSR.
  26. Markaryan, E. (1992). Tradition as an object of systemic research. Nauka.
  27. Plato. (1972). Sochineniya: V 3 t. Moscow: Mysl.
  28. Ricoeur, P. (1995). Germenevtika. Etika. Politika. Moscow: KAMI Publishing, Academia.
  29. Shils, E. (2019). Comparative social dynamics. Taylor & Francis.
  30. Sukhanov, I. V. (1976). Obychai, traditsii i preemstvennost pokoleniy. Moscow: Politizdat.
  31. Suri, A., & Jindal, L. (2022). Financial literacy for well-being: Scientific mapping and bibliometric analysis. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education, 21(3), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/14788047221120917
  32. Szacki, J. (1990). Utopia and tradition. Moscow: Progress.
  33. Sztompka, P. (1996). Sotsiologiya sotsial'nykh izmeneniy (V. A. Yadov, Ed.; A. S. Dmitriev, Trans.). Moscow: Aspekt-Press.
  34. Tylor, E. B. (2021). The science of culture. University of Toronto Press.
  35. Weber, M. (2019). Science, values and politics in Max Weber's methodology: New expanded edition.Taylor & Francis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)