Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020)
Space and Culture, India

Research

Gender Gaps in Elementary Education in India in the post Right to Education Act Period: Implications for Policy

Published 2020-09-29

  • Nurzamal Hoque
    • ,
  • Ratul Mahanta

Nurzamal Hoque
Department of Economics, Pragjyotish College, Guwahati, Assam, India, 781009

Ratul Mahanta
Department of Economics, Gauhati University, Guwahati, Assam, India, 781014

Abstract

While the gender gaps in elementary education in India have almost been eliminated, we obtain somewhat different picture when adjusting the gaps to the appropriate school-age children (6-14 years) and the number of the child population. We calculate gender gaps in enrolment, transition rate (from primary to upper primary level), achievement in the examination, and test scores in different subjects in the post Right to Education Act period and obtain that girls are ahead of the boys in almost all aspects. The age-adjusted gender gap in enrolment has improved, implying that over time girls are more likely to enrol in schools within the appropriate school-age. Also, fewer girls are expected to remain out of schools compared to boys within the appropriate school-age. Perhaps, this progress in enrolment has resulted in better performances of girls in transition rate, achievement in examinations and test scores in individual subjects. The rising girls’ performance on different indicators of elementary education indicates the potential impacts of female share on future labour market.

Keywords

Enrolment Ratio, Transition Rate, Labour Market, Human Rights, Gender Parity Index, India

pdf

References

  1. Arabage, A. C. and Souza, A. P. (2019). Wage Dynamics and Inequality in the Brazilian formal Labor Market. EconomiA, 20, 153-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econ.2019.10.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econ.2019.10.001
  2. Bandyopadhyay, M. and Subrahmanian, R. (2008). Gender Equity in Education: A Review of Trends and Factors. Consortium for Research on Educational Access, Transitions and Equity. Research Monograph No 18. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/1866
  3. Buchmann, C. and DiPrete, Thomas A. (2006). The Growing Female Advantage in College Completion: The Role of Family Background and Academic Achievement. American Sociological Review, 71, 515-41. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F000312240607100401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100401
  4. Clark, S. (2000). Son Preference and Sex Composition of Children: Evidence from India. Demography, 37(1), 95-108. DOI: 10.2307/2648099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2648099
  5. Cooray, A. and Potrafke, N. (2011). Gender Inequality in Education: Political Institutions or Culture and Religion? European Journal of Political Economy, 27(2), 268-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2010.08.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2010.08.004
  6. Dahl, Gordon B. and Moretti, E. (2008). The Demand for Sons. The Review of Economic Studies, 75. 1085-1120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00514.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00514.x
  7. Echavarri, R. and Ezcurra, R. (2011). Education and Gender Bias in the Sex Ratio at Birth: Evidence From India. Demography, 47(1), 249–268. DOI: 10.1353/dem.0.0089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0089
  8. GOI (2018). Women and Men in India. A statistical compilation of Gender related Indicators in India, Central Statistics Office Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, GOI. http://www.mospi.gov.in/sites/default/files/publication_reports/Women%20and%20Men%20%20in%20India%202018.pdf
  9. GOI (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Ministry of Human Resource Development, GOI. https://www.mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf
  10. Goldin, C., Lawrence F. Katz, and Kuziemko, I. (2006). The Homecoming of American College Women: The Reversal of the College Gender Gap. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(4), 133-56. DOI: 10.1257/jep.20.4.133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.20.4.133
  11. Guilmoto, C. Z., Saikia, N., Tamrakar, V., Bora, J. K. (2018). Excess under-5 female Mortality across India: A Spatial Analysis using 2011 Census data. The Lancet: Global Health, 6, https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30184-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30184-0
  12. Hajovsky, Daniel B., Benjamin A. Mason, Luke A. McCune (2017). Teacher-student relationship quality and academic achievement in elementary school: A longitudinal examination of gender differences, Journal of School Psychology, 63, 119-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.04.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.04.001
  13. Houtte, Mieke V. (2004). Why Boys Achieve less at School than Girls: The Difference Between Boys’ and Girls’ Academic Culture. Educational Studies, 30(2), 159-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569032000159804 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569032000159804
  14. Jayachandran, S. and Rohini Pande, R. (2017). Why Are Indian Children So Short? The Role of Birth Order and Son Preference. American Economic Review, 107(9), 2600–29. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151282
  15. Kugler, Adriana D. and Kumar, S. (2017). Preference for Boys, Family Size, and Educational Attainment in India. Demography, 54, 835-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-017-0575-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-017-0575-1
  16. Kundu, P. (2019). Deteriorating Quality of Education in Schools: Are Teachers Responsible? Economic & Political Weekly, 54(24), 34-41. https://www.epw.in/journal/2019/24/special-articles/deteriorating-quality-education-schools.html
  17. Lacour, M., Tissington, L. D. (2011). The Effects of Poverty on Academic Achievement. Educational Research and Review, 6(7), 522-27.
  18. Lai, F. (2010). Are Boys Left Behind? The Evolution of the Gender Achievement Gap in Beijing's Middle Schools. Economics of Education Review, 29(3), 383-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.07.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.07.009
  19. Mickelson, R. A., and Greene, A. D. (2006). Connecting Pieces of the Puzzle: Gender Differences in Black middle School Students’ Achievement. Journal of Negro Education, 75, 34-48.
  20. Pomerantz, E. M., Altermatt, E. R., and Saxon, J. L. (2002). Making the Grade but Feeling Distressed: Gender differences in Academic Performance and Internal Distress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 396-404. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.396 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.396
  21. Rubiano-Matulevich E. C. and Viollaz, M. (2019). Gender Differences in Time Use Allocating Time between the Market and the Household. Policy Research Working Paper 8981. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3437824, accessed on 10 September 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8981
  22. Tesema, M. T. and Braeken, J. (2018). Regional Inequalities and Gender Differences in Academic Achievement as a Function of Educational Opportunities: Evidence from Ethiopia. International Journal of Educational Development, 60, 51-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.10.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.10.023
  23. The Gazette of India (2009). The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. New Delhi, Ministry of Law and Justice. https://www.mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/upload_document/rte.pdf
  24. UN Women (2015). Progress of the world’s women 2015–2016: Transforming Economies, Realizing Rights. United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women. https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2015/4/progress-of-the-worlds-women-2015
  25. UNESCO (2016a). Gender inequality in learning achievement in primary education. What can TERCE tell us? UNESCO and the Regional Office for Education in Latin America and the Caribbean. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002443/244349e.pdf
  26. UNESCO (2016b). Education 2030: Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action for the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4: Ensure Inclusive and Equitable Quality Education and Promote Lifelong Learning Opportunities for All. ED-2016/WS/28. UNESCO, Paris. http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/education-2030-incheon-framework-for-action-implementation-of-sdg4-2016-en_2.pdf
  27. UNICEF (2020). Child Marriage around the World. https://www.unicef.org/stories/child-marriage-around-world
  28. United Nations (2012). The Millennium Development Goals Report 2012. United Nations, New Work. https://doi.org/10.18356/32f1e244-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.18356/32f1e244-en
  29. Varughese, A. R. and Bairagya, I. (2020). Group-based Educational Inequalities in India: Have Major Education Policy Interventions been Effective? International Journal of Educational Development, 73, 102-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102159 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102159
  30. Voyer, D. and Voyer, Susan D. (2014). Gender Differences in Scholastic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1174-1204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036620 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036620
  31. WEF (2006). The Global Gender Gap Report 2006, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GenderGap_Report_2006.pdf
  32. WEF (2020). The Global Gender Gap Report 2006, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2020.pdf
  33. World Bank (2019). Women, Business and the Law 2019, A Decade of Reform. The World Bank, Washington DC. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/31327
  34. World’s Women Report (2015). The World’s Women 2015: Trends and Statistics. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, New York. DOI: 10.18356/9789210573719

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.