Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Role of Literary Pedagogy in Modern Education of Preschool and Primary School Children


The study examines the concept of literary pedagogy as an integral part of the educational process. The authors argue that literary pedagogy as a modern trend in human development is linked to the system of continuous education, which is implemented in formal, non-formal and informal education. A distinction should be drawn between the concepts of literary education and literary pedagogy. Literary education as a process of an individual’s incorporation into the culture by means of literature is generally provided within the framework of formal education and is based on two fundamental principles — artistic and literary-aesthetic. The authors consider literary education as an aspect of literary pedagogy. This research examines the experience of the formation and development of literary pedagogy. Particular attention is given to the issue of training specialists who would be prepared to support children’s and youth reading. Given the integrative, interdisciplinary character of the reading skill, the research presents strong evidence in favour of literary pedagogy which is developing as a branch of pedagogy and as a reaction to the fall of interest in reading. Furthermore, the study provides an overview of the literary pedagogy.


Literature, Literary Education, Literary Pedagogy, Formal, Non-formal and Informal Education



  1. Bal, P.M., & Veltkamp, M. (2013). How Does Fiction Reading Influence Empathy? An Experimental Investigation on the Role of Emotional Transportation. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e55341. DOI:
  2. Bernice, E.C. (2000). Independent Reading and School Achievement. School library media research. Research journal of the American association of school librarians, vol. 3. Retrieved on 12 September 2018 from,
  3. Bobkina, J., & Stefanova, S. (2016). Literature and critical literacy pedagogy in the EFL classroom: Towards a model of teaching critical thinking skills. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching. SSLLT, 6(4), 677-696. DOI:10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.4.6Corpus ID: 55717684
  4. Borsheim-Black, C., Macaluso, M., & Petrone, R. (2014). Critical Literature Pedagogy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(2), 123-133. DOI: 10.1002/jaal.323 DOI:
  5. Bozhkova, G. N., Shastina, E. M., Kalimullina, O. V., & Shatunova, O. V. (2019). Study of literary images of gifted characters in optional activities as a means to develop capable and talented youth. Space and Culture, India, 7(1), 264-273. doi:10.20896/saci.v7i1.463 DOI:
  6. Bugaeva, A.P., & Sokorutova, L.V. (2018). Influence of Children’s Yakut literature on the Development of the Spiritual and Moral Culture of Younger Schoolchildren. Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania, 34 (4), 189-194.
  7. Bus, A.G., Van IJzendoorn, M.H., & Pellegrini, A.D. (1995). Joint Book Reading Makes for Success in Learning to Read: A Meta-Analysis on Intergenerational Transmission of Literacy. Review of Educational Research, 65 (1),1-21. DOI: 10.2307/1170476 DOI:
  8. Courtland, M.C., French, M.E., Owston, S., & Stead, V. (1998). Literary text, the reader, and the power of shared response. Canadian Journal of Education, 23(3), 329-34. DOI: 10.1179/152991005791330195 DOI:
  9. Sanneke de la Rie, Roel C.M., van Steensel, R.C.M., van Gelderen, A.J.S., & Severiens, S. (2018). The role of type of activity in parent–child interactions within a family literacy programme: comparing prompting boards and shared reading. Early Child Development and Care, 188 (8), 1076-1092. doi: 10.1080 / 03004430.2016.1248957 DOI:
  10. Désiron, J.C., Vries, E., Bartel, A.N., & Varahamurti, N. (2018). The influence of text cohesion and picture detail on young readers’ knowledge of science topics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88( 3), 465-479. DOI:10.1111/bjep.12195Corpus ID: 19273628 Desmond, R. The Role of Reading for Children and Adolescents in a Digital Age, Retrieved on 4 October 2018 from, DOI:
  11. Don, T.K. (2013). Art Pedagogy in the Modern Educational Paradigm. Science. Art. Culture, 2, 144-152.
  12. Fyfe, P. (2011). Digital Pedagogy Unplugged. Digital Humanities Quarterly, vol. 5, no. 3. Retrieved on 4 October 2018 from,
  13. Galleron, I., Idmhand, F., & Meynard, C. (2018). Let a thousand readings flourish. A crowdreading experience. Digital humanities quarterly, 12, (1.) Retrieved on insert date and year from,
  14. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701Corpus ID: 10197772
  15. Geske, A., & Ozola, A. (2008). Factors influencing reading literacy at the primary school level. Problems of education in the 21st century, vol. 6, pp. 71-77.
  16. Gorshkova, V.V. (2014). Interaction of formal, non-formal and informal education as a modern trend in human development. Concept. Retrieved on 4 October 2018 from,
  17. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701Corpus ID: 10197772
  18. Ignatov, D.M., & Kapinova, E.S. (2018). Kinopedagogika as an interactive method of teaching methods of physical education in primary school. Prospects of science and education, 2(32),215-218. ISSN 2307-2334
  19. Jentgens, S. (2016). Lehrbuch Literatur pädagogik. Eine Einführung in Theorie und Praxis der Literatur vermittlung. Beltz Verlag, Weinheim Basel, 244 s. Retrieved on 3 November 2018 from, ISBN:978-3-7799-3330-4
  20. Johnston, V. (2015). The Power of the Read Aloud in the Age of the Common Core. The Open Communication Journal, no. 9, pp. 34-38. DOI:10.2174/1874916x01509010034Corpus ID: 145112952
  21. Kamil, M. L. (2003). Reading for the 21st century: Adolescent literature teaching and learning strategies. Alliance for Excellent Education. Available at: (Accessed 20 September 2018).
  22. Kneepkens, E.W.E.M., & Zwaan, R.A. (1994). Emotions and literary text comprehension. Poetics 23, 125-138. DOI:10.1016/0304-422X(94)00021-W DOI:
  23. Korat, O., & Segal-Drori, O. (2016). E-Book and Printed Book Reading in Different Contexts as Emergent Literacy Facilitator. Early Education and Development, 27(4), 532-550, DOI:10.1080/10409289.2016.1095613 DOI:
  24. Kuijpers, M.M., Hakemulder, F., Tanb, E.S., & Doicarub, M.M. (2014). Exploring absorbing reading experiences. Developing and validating a self-report scale to measure story world absorption. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(. 1), 89–122. DOI:10.1075/ssol.4.1.05kui DOI:
  25. Leseman, P.P.M., & De Jong, P.F. (1998). Home literacy: Opportunity, instruction, cooperation and social-emotional quality predicting early reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 33 (3), 294-318. doi:10.1598/rrq.33.3.3 DOI:
  26. Linnakylä, P, Malin, A., & Taube, K. (2004). Factors behind Low Reading Literacy Achievement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48 (3), 231-249. DOI:10.1080/00313830410001695718 DOI:
  27. Literary education in the modern world: problems and solutions (2012). XX Golubkov Readings: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, March 15-16, Moscow: Ekoninform, , 174 p.
  28. Mar, R.A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. B. (2009). Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 34,407- 428. DOI:10.1515/COMM.2009.025 DOI:
  29. Maslieva, E.S. (2016). The system of principles of teaching a foreign language on the basis of pedagogy. Successes of modern science and education, 2 (12), 159-163.
  30. Mironchuk, E.V. (2014). Interdisciplinary connection of the pedagogy of the school and theatrical pedagogy in the process of training professionally competent students of the pedagogical university. Bulletin of Moscow State Regional University. Series: Pedagogy, 4 4185-190.
  31. Moorman, K., & Ram, A. (1994). A functional theory of creative reading. Retrieved on 10 October 2018 from, at: DOI:10.21236/ada496794 DOI:
  32. Morrow, L. M. (1983). Home and school correlates of early interest in literature. Journal of Educational Research, 76, 221–230, DOI:10.1080/00220671.1983.10885455
  33. Nipold, M., Duthie, J., & Larson, J. (2005). Literacy as a leisure activity: Free-time preferences of older children and young adolescents. Language, speech, and hearing services in schools, 36(2), 93–102. DOI: 10.1044/0161-1461(2005/009) DOI:
  34. Okershko, A.V. (2015). Informational education in the Context of Globalization // Problems and Prospects of Humanities in the Context of Globalization: Proceedings of the VII International Scientific and Practical Conference (] 2015, Moscow). Moscow: Perot, 77-81.
  35. Parish-Morris, J., Mahajan, N., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R.M., & Collins, M.F. (2013). Once upon a time: Parent-child dialogue and storybook reading in the electronic era. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7 (3), 200-211. DOI:10.1111/mbe.12028 DOI:
  36. Senechal, M., & Le Fevre, J. (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children’s reading skill: A 5-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 73(2),445–460. DOI:10.1111/1467-8624.00417 DOI:
  37. Sergeeva, N.Yu. (2008). The content of the concept of “art pedagogy”. Izvestia VSPU,. 1, 23-28.
  38. Sergeevna, G.M. (2018). The modern fairy tale as a means of development of speech of preschool children and education of reader’s interests. Perspektivy Nauki I Obrazovania, 33 (3), 211-216.
  39. Shekhovskaya, N.L., & Mandeebura, E.P. (2011). Museum pedagogy: historical and pedagogical analysis. Scientific bulletins of Belgorod State University. Series: The humanities, 101,343-350.
  40. Simon, H.A. (1996). Observations on the sciences of science learning, Paper prepared for the Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning for the Sciences of Science Learning: An Interdisciplinary Discussion. Retrieved on 14 September 2018 from, s/the-learner-centered-classroom/ DOI: 10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00055-6 DOI:
  41. Smart, D., Youssef, G.J., Sanson, A., Prior, M., Toumbourou, J.W., & Olsson, C.A. (2017). Consequences of childhood reading difficulties and behaviour problems for educational achievement and employment in early adulthood. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 288-308. DOI:10.1111/bjep.12150 DOI:
  42. The Concept of the program to support children’s and youthreading in Russian Federation. Approved by the decree of the Government of the Russian Federation on June 3, 2017, no. 1155-r, 15 p. Retrieved on 4 October 2018 from,: Qx1KuzCtzwmqEuy7OA5XldAz9LMukDyQ.pdf
  43. Tung, C., & Chang, S. (2009). Developing critical thinking through literature reading. Feng Chia Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 19, = 287-317.
  44. Vacca, R.T. (1975). The development of a functional reading strategy: Implications for content area instruction. The Journal of Educational Research, 69(3,) 108-112. Retrieved on 4 October 2018 from,
  45. Volkova, E.A. (2012). Transformation of college student’s reading: the end of 80th. ХХ - the beginning of XXI centuries. Cand.ped. sci. diss.. Krasnodar, 174
  46. Weber, C., & Cavanaugh, T. (2006). Promoting reading: Using eBooks with gifted and advanced readers. Gifted Child Today, 29(4), 56–63. DOI: 10.4219/gct-2006-9 DOI:
  47. Yal Çinta Ş Sezgin, & E., Ulus, L. (2017). The early literacy at preschool education: The book or the E-book? Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16 (4), 77-83.
  48. Zakharov, A.B., & Kapuza, A.V. (2017). Parenting practices for learning to read and the level of reading literacy of children in Russia: According to PIRLS-2011. Issues of Education, 2, 234 – 257.


Download data is not yet available.