Vol. 12 No. 3 (2024)
Journal Space and Culture, India

Perspective

Modus Ethical Categories as a Condition for the Emergence of Phraseological Semantics, their Application in Political Discourse

Published 2024-11-29

  • Klara Abisheva
    • ,
  • Marzhan Akosheva
    • ,
  • Gulbagira Ayupova
    • ,
  • Aiman Nurgazina
    • ,
  • Bulat Ayapbergenov
    • ,
  • Assel Baikadamova

Klara Abisheva
Professor, Turan-Astana University, Ykylas Dukenuly Street, 29. 010013 Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan

Marzhan Akosheva
Professor, Department of Kazakh and Russian Languages, S.Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical Research University, Zhenis Ave, 62, 010011, Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan

Gulbagira Ayupova
Associate Professor, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Satpayev Street, 2. 010008, Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan

Aiman Nurgazina
Associate Professor, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Satpayev Street, 2. 010008, Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan

Bulat Ayapbergenov
Associate Professor, S.Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical Research University, Department of Kazakh and Russian Languages, Zhenis Avenue, 62, 010011, Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan

Assel Baikadamova
Doctoral Student, Department of Foreign Philology, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Satpayev Street, 2. 010008, Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan

Abstract

This article presents the results of a study of the formation processes of phraseological meanings considering cognitive-discursive conditions. Traditional and new (cognitive) approaches to the formation of phraseological semantics are analysed, and a method for the formation of phraseological meaning is proposed, namely the use of cognitive-discursive categories of state-mode. Modal categories contribute to a new moral and evaluative aspect of meaning. The research focuses on the representation of phraseological meanings in the formats of knowledge, concepts and ethical categories. The study aims to examine a new way of forming phraseological meanings based on the study of modus categories as a cognitive-discursive condition, as well as evaluative categorisation and the presentation of phraseological ethical knowledge in cognitive knowledge formats. An integrative methodological paradigm and a cognitive-semantic approach were applied in the study.   Cognitive semantics offers new principles for analysing phraseological units: equality of cognitive and communicative functions of language, interdisciplinarity, multifactoriality, anthropocentricity and multilevelness. When using them, phraseological units can be studied integratively, involving knowledge and methods from various sciences. Methods of modelling, contextual inference, evaluative categorisation, interpretation, cognitive-discursive analysis and associative experiment were also used. The study analyses various points of view on the nature of phraseological semantics, the cognitive-discursive and anthropological essence of phraseological meaning, and the possibility of phraseological units acting as knowledge formats.  The novelty of the work lies in the application of an integrative methodological paradigm based on cognitive-semantic and cognitive-discursive approaches, with an emphasis on the role of modus categories and evaluative categorisation in the formation of phraseological evaluative meaning in identifying the formats of phraseological knowledge, in applying a modus approach to the analysis of phraseological meanings.

Keywords

Phraseological Semantics, Secondary Conceptualisation, Evaluative Categorisation, Associative Experiment, Cognitive-Discursive Approach

pdf

References

  1. Аkosheva М., Rakhimzhanov К., & Temirgazina Z. (2022). Who do we compare ugly people with? Standards of ugliness in the Russian language. Slavia Centralis, 15(1), 138–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18690/scn.15.1.138–154.2022
  2. Alefirenko, N.F. (2005). Phraseological meaning: Nature, Essence, Structure. Facets of the Word: Collection of Scientific Articles for the 65th Anniversary of V.M. Mokienko. Moscow: EHLPIS. 21–27.
  3. Alefirenko, N.F. (2008). Phraseology and Cognitivism in the Aspect of Linguistic Postmodernism: Monograph. Belgorod: BelSU Publishing. https://viewer.rsl.ru/ru/rsl01004626756
  4. Al-Yanai, E.K. (2020). Essence and Genesis of the Concepts “Value”, “Value Orientations” “Value Attitude” in Pedagogy. World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology, 8(4), 1. https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/59PDMN420.pdf.
  5. Bakhtin, M.M. (1986). The Aesthetics of Verbal Creativity. Moscow: Iskusstvo. 445. https://runivers.ru/upload/iblock/94e/bahtin.pdf
  6. Baranov, A.N., & Dobrovolsky, D.O. (2009). Principles of semantic description of phraseology. Questions of Linguistics. (6).21-34. https://vja.ruslang.ru/sites/default/files/journals/2009/2009-6.pdf
  7. Belousov, K.I., Zelyanskaya, N.L., Sychyov, O.A., & Vlasov, M.S. (2020). Understanding the amoral in the context of the moral foundations’ theory: a sociopsychological and linguocognitive study. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. (456). 16–27. DOI 10.17223/15617793/456/2
  8. Boldyrev, N.N. (2006). Language categories as a knowledge format. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics. (2). 5–22. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/yazykovye-kategorii-kak-format-znaniya
  9. Boldyrev, N.N. (2008). Principles and methods of cognitive language studies. Collection of scientific papers. Tambov. 11-30. https://languagejournal.spbu.ru/article/download/3900/3483/
  10. Boldyrev N.N., Dubrovskaya O.G., & Tolmacheva I.N. (2017). Meaning in the mind within the sociocultural commitment of cognitive linguistics. Revista de Lenguas Para Fines Específicos 23 (2). 206- 225.
  11. Brusilovskaya, E. (2024, 11 March). Billions "for one window" have not been cut through. Novaya Gazeta. https://www.novgaz.com/index.php/component/content/article/2-news/3656-
  12. Dobrovolsky, D.O., & Karaulov, Yu.N. (1992). Phraseology in an Associative Dictionary. Proceedings of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Series: Literature and Language. 51 (6). 3–13.
  13. Gak, G.V. (1998). Language transformations. Moscow: Languages of Russian Culture. https://biblioclub.ru/index.php?page=book&id=211217
  14. Gunina, N.A. (2012). On the question of the necessity of developing the contextual inference method. Cognitive Studies of Language. Issue XI. International Congress on Cognitive Linguistics October 10-12, 2012: Collection of Materials. Moscow: Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences; Tambov: Publishing House of TSU named after G.R. Derzhavin. 255–257.
  15. Guselnikova, O.V. (2009). Cognitive aspect of phraseology study. Current Issues in Contemporary Science. (5-2), 155–162. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kognitivnyy-aspekt-izucheniya-frazeologii
  16. Kornblith, H. (2008). The metaphysical status of knowledge. Norsk Filosofisk Tidsskrift, 43 (1), 77-92. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-2901-2008-01-07
  17. Lakoff, J. & Johnson, M. (2004). Metaphors We Live By. Moscow: URSS, 256. https://codenlp.ru/books/lakoff.pdf
  18. Mager Yu (2024, 18 March). The image of the future: "A fair Kazakhstan – A responsible citizen – A Progressive nation". Kazakhstanskaya Pravda. https://kazpravda.kz/n/obraz-budushchego-spravedlivyy-kazahstan-otvetstvennyy-grazhdanin-progressivnaya-natsiya/
  19. Magirovskaya, O.V. (2009). Conceptualization levels in language. Cognitive Studies. Issue IV. Conceptualization of the World in Language. Moscow: Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences; Tambov: Publishing House of TSU named after G.R. Derzhavin. 78–96. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18441672 ISSN: 2071-9639
  20. Naumova, N.G. (2009). The image of P.I. Chichikov as a verbalization of the concept “Entrepreneur” (based on the material of N.V. Gogol’s Poem “Dead Souls”). Bulletin of Vyatka State University. 1 (2). 29–32. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/obraz-p-i-chichikova-kak-verbalizatsiya-kontsepta-predprinimatel-na-materiale-poemy-n-v-gogolya-mertvye-dushi
  21. Phraseological Dictionary of the Russian Language (2009). Compiled by Stepanova M.I. Publisher: Victoria Plus. Sаt. Petersburg. 608. https://www.labirint.ru/books/68117/
  22. Plotnikova, I. (2021, 02 March). Minnikhanov on corruption: "If I close my eyes, it means I will contribute". Real'noye Vremya: Newspaper. https://m.realnoevremya.ru/articles/204792-publichnaya-antikorrupcionnaya-porka-ministrov-i-glav-v-kazanskom-kremle
  23. Popova, Z.D., & Sternin, I.A. (2007). Cognitive Linguistics. Monograph. Moscow: Vostok-Zapad. http://sterninia.ru/files/757/4_Izbrannye_nauchnye_publikacii/Kognitivnaja_lingvistika/Kognitivnaja_lingvistika_2007.pdf
  24. Potebnya, A.A. (1999). Thought and Language. Collected Works. Moscov: Labirint. https://viewer.rusneb.ru/ru/000199_000009_004436553?page=11&rotate=0&theme=white
  25. Radchenko, E.V. (2010). The process of forming of the phraseology significance. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Linguistics. (1). 47–50. file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/protsess-formirovaniya-frazeologicheskogo-znacheniya.pdf
  26. Razumov, Ya (2005, 18 November). The public block “Elections - public control” believes that the opposition is deliberately provoking a conflict with the authorities. Panorama: Kazakh Weekly Newspaper. http://panoramakz.com/index.php/archive?y=2005&n=44&utm_source=google.com&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=google.com&utm_referrer=google.com
  27. Romanova, T.V. (2006). The category of modality considering cognitive linguistics. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics. (1). 29-36. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kategoriya-modalnosti-v-svete-kognitivnoy-lingvistiki
  28. Sagintaeva, A.K. (2010). Cognitive aspects of phraseological meaning. Bulletin of KazNU. Philological Series. 6 (130). 335–341. file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/2439.pdf
  29. Teliya, V.N. (1996). Russian Phraseology (Semantic, Pragmatic and Linguacultural Aspects). Moscow: School Languages of Russian Culture. URL: https://biblioclub.ru/index.php?page=book&id=213170
  30. Teliya, V.N. (1977). Secondary Nomination and Its Types. Moscow: Nauka. 129–221. https://urss.ru/cgi-bin/db.pl?lang=Ru&blang=ru&page=Book&id=93438 136.
  31. Temirgazina, Z., Nikolaenko, S., Akosheva, M., Luczyk, M., & Khamitov, G. (2020). Naive anatomy in the Kazakh language world picture in comparison with English and Russian. XLinguae, 13(2), 3–16. DOI: 10.18355/XL.2020.13.02.01.
  32. Vishnevsky, B. (2006, 29 May). So as not to lose face. Novaya Gazeta. https://novayagazeta.spb.ru/articles/2710/
  33. Zhumagulov, B. (2007, 23 August). The responsibility of victory. Kazakhstanskaya Pravda. https://nomad.su/?a=3-200708240440

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)