Vol. 11 No. 4 (2024)
Journal Space and Culture, India

Research

Assessing the Managerial Capabilities of Staff: A Systematic Model

Published 2024-03-29

  • Madiyar Yunussov
    • ,
  • Altyn Yessirkepova
    • ,
  • Parida Baineyeva
    • ,
  • Zhanna Aliyeva
    • ,
  • Inna Polezhayeva

Madiyar Yunussov
M.Auezov South Kazakhstan University, Tauke Khan av.5, 160001, Shymkent, Kazakhstan

Altyn Yessirkepova
Professor, Doctor of Economics, M.Auezov South Kazakhstan University, Tauke Khan av.5, 160001, Shymkent, Kazakhstan

Parida Baineyeva
Professor, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Zhumabek Tashenev University, Shymkent, Kazakhstan

Zhanna Aliyeva
Associated Professor, Candidate of Economics Sciences, Narxoz Business School Research and Education Department, Management and Marketing

Inna Polezhayeva
Associated Professor, Candidate of Economics Sciences, M.Auezov South Kazakhstan University, Tauke Khan av.5, 160001, Shymkent, Kazakhstan

Abstract

Currently, there are many advanced and proven evaluation methods. However, there is practically no work on the systematisation of evaluation criteria considering management levels, tasks, and functions. The purpose of the study is to develop a systemological model for assessing the managerial potential of personnel, which combines the main components that determine the effectiveness of the organisation’s management staff.   This study involved 48 males and 34 females aged 23 to 66 years, performing the role and functions of a leader. The primary condition for selecting the participants for the study was based on the level of higher education and managerial experience. All respondents were divided into five groups based on their qualifications, as well as the experiences gained from the management activities. To accomplish the study’s objectives, an evaluation list of criteria was compiled, which made it possible to systematise the managerial potential of personnel based on management levels, tasks, and functions performed. The findings of the study demonstrate systematisation of approaches to managerial potential from the organisation’s perspective, which in turn allowed us to build a systemological model for assessing the managerial potential of personnel.

Keywords

Managerial Capability, Systematic Model, Systematisation of Experiences, Assessments

pdf

References

  1. Amsteus, M. (2011). Managerial foresight: measurement scale and estimation. Foresight 13(1), 58–76. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14636681111109705/full/html DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14636681111109705
  2. Andrews, R., & Boyne, G. A. (2010). Capacity, leadership, and organizational performance: testing the black box model of public management. Public Administration Review, 70(3), 443–454. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02158.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02158.x
  3. Appiah, G., & Sarpong, D. (2015). On the influence of organisational routines on strategic foresight. Foresight, 17(5). 10.1108/FS-11-2014-0067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-11-2014-0067
  4. Bogaert, S., & Vloeberghs, D. (2005). Differentiated and individualized personnel management: Diversity management in Belgium. European Management Journal, 23(4), 483–493. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0263237305000794 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2005.06.001
  5. Bontis, N. (2002). Assessing knowledge assets: a review of the models used to measure intellectual capital. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(1), 41–60. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1468-2370.00053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00053
  6. Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). The Competent Manager: A Model for Effective Performance. John Wiley & Sons.
  7. Bragues, G. (2009). Adam Smith’s vision of the ethical manager. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 447–460. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40863681 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0600-4
  8. Cheymetova, V. A., & Scherbakov, V. V. (2017). Methodological approaches to managerial efficiency evaluation of organization. Espacios, 38(48), 8. https://www.revistaespacios.com/a17v38n48/a17v38n48p08.pdf
  9. Chizhevskaya, E. L., Zemenkova, M. Y., & Mayss, N. (2020). Directions to improve effectiveness of management of management of the industry company personnel. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 459(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/459/5/052093 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/459/5/052093
  10. Coe, C. K. (1992). The MBTI: Potential uses and misuses in personnel administration. Public Personnel Management, 21(4), 511–522. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/009102609202100407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009102609202100407
  11. Cordero, D. B., & Carrillo, A. T. (2017). La Sistematización como investigación interpretativa crítica. Bogotá: Editorial El Búho., IJAR – International Journal of Action Research, 2-2019. 171-174. https://doi.org/10.3224/ijar.v15i2.06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3224/ijar.v15i2.06
  12. Costamagna, P., & Spinelli, E. (2022). Systematisation of experiences within the framework of the pedagogical approach towards territorial development: a contribution to action research from the Latin American tradition. International Journal of Action Research, 17(3). https://elibrary.utb.de/doi/abs/10.3224/ijar.v17i3.02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3224/ijar.v17i3.02
  13. Crawford, L., Hobbs, B., & Turner, J. R. (2006). Aligning Capability with Strategy: Categorizing Projects to do the Right Projects and to do Them Right. Project Management Journal, 37(2), 38-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280603700205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280603700205
  14. Crowley, G. R., & Sobel, R. S. (2010). Adam Smith: managerial insights from the father of economics. Journal of Management History. 16(4), 504–508. https://doi.org/10.1108/17511341011073979 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17511341011073979
  15. Drucker, P. F. (1967). The Effective Executive. Harper & Row Publishers. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=aSZHAAAAMAAJ&source=gbs_book_other_versions
  16. Dokukina I. A., Polyanin A. V. (2020). Formation of tools for the balanced distribution of organizational tasks in government institutions. News of the South-West State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management., 10(3). 75-89.
  17. Fursov, V., Rudnev, A., Malinina, O., Alekhina, E., & Kushnareva, I. (2019). Development of a methodology to assess the regional labor potential in modern Russia. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), 9(1), 1613–1618. https://dspace.ncfu.ru/bitstream/20.500.12258/8590/1/scopusresults 1071 .pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.A4578.119119
  18. Godbout, A. (2001). Managing Core Competencies: The Impact of Knowledge Management on Human Resources Practices in Leading Edge Organizations. Scoap.Com. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1441(200004/06)7:2<76::AID-KPM70>3.0.CO;2-B
  19. Holliday, O. J. (2020). Systematisation of experiences: New paths to academic work in universities. International Journal of Action Research, 16(1). https://elibrary.utb.de/doi/abs/10.3224/ijar.v16i1.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3224/ijar.v16i1.05
  20. Holliday, Ó. J. (2012). Systematisation of experiences, research and evaluation: Three different approaches. The International Journal for Global and Development Education Research, 1(February), 71–84. http://educacio-cp89.webjoomla.es/wp-content/uploads/02B-Jara-Inglés2.pdf
  21. Krajcovicova, K., Caganova, D., & Cambal, M. (2012). Key managerial competencies and competency models in industrial enterprise. annals of daaam for 2012 & proceedings of the 23rd international daaam symposium, 23(1), 1119–1122. https://tarjomefa.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/8041-English-TarjomeFa.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.2507/23rd.daaam.proceedings.261
  22. Lakhani, K. R., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Open innovation and organizational boundaries: task decomposition, knowledge distribution and the locus of innovation. In Handbook of Economic Organization: Integrating Economic and Organization Theory (pp. 355–382). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782548225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849803984.00030
  23. Lipshitz, R., Klein, G., Orasanu, J., & Salas, E. (2001). Taking stock of naturalistic decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14(5), 331–352. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bdm.381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.381
  24. Massingham, P. (2014). An evaluation of knowledge management tools: Part 1 – managing knowledge resources. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(6), 1075–1100. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JKM-11-2013-0449/full/html DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2013-0449
  25. Mintzberg, H. The Nature of Managerial Work (1973) & Simply Managing: What Manager Do - And Can Do Better (2013): Paperback: 298 pages Publisher: Harper & Row (2015) Language: English ISBN: 978-0060445560 Paperback: 216 pages Publisher: Berrett-Koehler (2013) Language: EnglishISBN: 978-1609949234. M@n@gement, 18, 186-188. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.182.0186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.182.0186
  26. Naquin, S. S., & Holton, E. F. (2006). Leadership and managerial competency models: A simplified process and resulting model. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 8(2), 144–165. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1523422305286152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422305286152
  27. Rajadhyaksha, U. (2005). Managerial competence: Do technical capabilities matter? Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, 30(2), 47-56. DOI:10.1177/0256090920050204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090920050204
  28. Roberts, N., Campbell, D. E., & Vijayasarathy, L. R. (2016). Using information systems to sense opportunities for innovation: integrating postadoptive use behaviors with the dynamic managerial capability perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33(1), 45–69. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07421222.2016.1172452 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2016.1172452
  29. Rosa, C. S. da. (2019). Systematisation of experience: theory and practice. International Journal of Action Research, 2, 171–174. https://elibrary.utb.de/doi/pdf/10.3224/ijar.v15i2.06
  30. Sinyagin, Y. V. (2018). The components of managerial alacrity of government executives. European Research Studies Journal, 21(1), 295–308. https://www.ersj.eu/dmdocuments/2018_XXI_1_24.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/948
  31. Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at Work. John Wiley & Sons.
  32. Tai, J. C. F., Wang, E. T. G., & Yeh, H.-Y. (2019). A study of IS assets, IS ambidexterity, and IS alignment: the dynamic managerial capability perspective. Information & Management, 56(1), 55–69. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378720617302604 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.07.001
  33. Tasheva, S., & Nielsen, B. B. (2020). The role of global dynamic managerial capability in the pursuit of international strategy and superior performance. Journal of International Business Studies. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41267-020-00336-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00336-8
  34. Taylor, F. W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. Harper & Brothers Publishers. https://wpscms.pearsoncmg.com/wps/media/objects/3109/3184076/taylor.pdf
  35. Vyatkin, A. V, Vyatkina, G. Y., Fomina, L. V, & Shmeleva, Z. N. (2021). Managerial potential: emotional intelligence, empathy and tolerance to uncertainty of agribusiness managers. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 839. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/839/2/022048/meta DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/839/2/022048

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.