Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Reproductive Justice Discourse vis-à-vis Abortion Law in India: A Critical Review

Abstract

The narrative concerning third-world women has long been considered regressive, discriminatory, and monistic. The legal narratives, too, could not escape the traditional trope of identity ascribed to women. Though essentially empowering, the practical realisation of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act of 1971 could never harness a sense of inclusivity until the amendment of 2021. But the seven categories of women included in the amended Act did not consider the issues of pregnancy arising out of a consensual sexual encounter (contraceptive failure) for an unmarried woman. For the first time, the Supreme Court of India has recognised the concept of agency for all women without any external factor functioning as an influence. The idea of choice has never been celebrated. Thus, in the context of contemporary India, where the idea of the metanarrative of identity appears imminent and the third-world postmodern feminism celebrates the ideals of intersectionality, the legal discourse of deconstructing the difference among women in the name of marital status to strip them of their fundamental rights to bodily autonomy and reproductive justice needs intervention. This review paper intends to diachronically approach the existing data of empirical and critical research on abortion vis-à-vis the human rights discourse in the context of Indian women.

Keywords

Abortion, Reproductive Justice, Women

pdf

References

  1. Arathi, P.M. (2022, October 20). Concerns around abortion in India differ from those in the West. The Hindu. https://frontline.thehindu.com/columns/concerns-around-abortion-in-india-differ-from-those-in-the-west/article66000417.ece
  2. Arnold, F., Kishor, S., & Roy, T.K. (2002). Sex-selective abortions in India. Population and Development Review, 28 (4), 759-785. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00759.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00759.x
  3. Bailey, A. (2011). Reconceiving surrogacy: Toward a reproductive justice account of Indian Surrogacy, Hypatia, 26 (4): 715–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01168.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01168.x
  4. Banerjee, S. K. (2012). Woman-centered research on access to safe abortion services and implications for behavioral change communication interventions: a cross-sectional study of women in Bihar and Jharkhand, India. BMC Public Health, 12(175). doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-175
  5. Basu, M. (2022, March 31). Of world’s 12.1 cr unplanned pregnancies every year, 1 in 7 occurs in India, says UNFPA report. The Print. https://theprint.in/health/of-worlds-12-1-cr-unplanned-pregnancies-every-year-1-in-7-occurs-in-india-says-unfpa-report/895320/
  6. Bhattacharyya, A. (n.d.). Marital rape laws: An international overview. Legal Services India. https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-7872-marital-rape-laws-an-international-overview.html
  7. Chabba, S. (2021, November 18). Just how progressive is India’s new abortion law? https://www.dw.com/en/abortion-in-india-bridging-the-gap-between-progressive-legislation-and-implementation/a-59853929
  8. Chandra, A., Shree, S., & Satish, M. S. M. (2021). Legal barriers to accessing sage abortion services in India: A fact finding study. National Law School of India University.
  9. Choudhary, A.A. (2022, September 30). In a first, Supreme Court recognises concept of marital rape. The Times of India. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/rape-under-abortion-law-includes-marital-rape-supreme-court/articleshow/94539535.cms
  10. Choudhuri, D. (2021, September 29). 50 years on, India’s abortion law still has serious gaps. (n.d.). https://thediplomat.com/2021/09/50-years-on-indias-abortion-law-still-has-serious-gaps/
  11. Chrisler, J. C. (2012). Reproductive justice: A global concern. ABC-CLIO.
  12. Combellick-Bidney, S. (2017). Reproductive rights as human rights: stories from advocates in Brazil, India and South Africa. The International Journal of Human Rights, 21(7), 800-822. doi: 10.1080/13642987.2016.1276446 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2016.1276446
  13. Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. (1981). https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/cedaw.pdf
  14. Garodia, P. (2021). Gender-based violence in India: A human rights approach. Peace for Asia. https://peaceforasia.org/gender-based-violence-in-india-a-human-rights-approach/
  15. Gaur, M. (2022, September 30). Supreme Court judgement on safe and legal abortion. Current Affairs Adda 247. https://currentaffairs.adda247.com/supreme-court-judgement-on-safe-and-legal-abortion/
  16. Ghosh, A., & Khaitan, N. (2017). A womb of one’s own: Privacy and reproductive rights. Economic and Political Weekly, 52(42-43). https://www.epw.in/engage/article/womb-ones-own-privacy-and-reproductive-rights
  17. Ghosh, P. (2022, September 29). Unmarried woman can undergo abortion up to 24 weeks: Supreme Court. Hindustan Times. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/forceful-pregnancy-of-a-married-woman-can-be-treated-as-rape-supreme-court-101664429398909.html
  18. Hirve, S.S. (2004). Abortion law, policy and services in India: A critical review. Reproductive Health Matters, 12 (24), 114-121. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15938164/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(04)24017-4
  19. Hughes, L. (1951). A dream deferred. Adventures in Reading.
  20. Indian Penal Code. (1860).https://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/A1860-45.pdf
  21. Jalnawalla, S.F. (1974). Medical termination of Pregnancy Act: A preliminary report of the first twenty months of implementation. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India. 587-592. https://jogi.co.in/storage/articles/files/filebase/Archives/1975/oct/1975_588_592_Oct.pdf.
  22. Johnston, H. (2002). Abortion practice in India: A review of literature. Centre for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes (CEHAT). http://www.cehat.org/go/uploads/AapIndia/work1.pdf
  23. Kabra, S. G. (2013). Abortion in India: Myth and reality. Rawat Publications.
  24. Karwa, S. (2022). From marginalization to reproductive justice: The Indian Supreme Court’s X v Govt. of NCT Delhi Judgment [Blog post].https://verfassungsblog.de/from-marginalization-to-reproductive-justice/
  25. Kashyap, S., & Tripathi, P. (2022a). Surrogacy or sale: Reflecting upon reproductive justice through The House for Hidden Mothers and A House of Happy Mothers. In B.W. Capo & L. Lazzari (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Reproductive Justice and Literature (pp. 423-444). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99530-0_20
  26. Kashyap, S; Tripathi, P. (2022b, August 23). Janhit mein jaari: Zee5 movie is an important but unbalanced call for Indians to use contraception. Feminism in India. https://feminisminindia.com/2022/08/24/janhit-mein-jaari-zee5-movie-is-an-important-but-unbalanced-call-for-indians-to-use-contraception/
  27. Khullar, A. (2022). Roe vs Wade Judgement overturned: A setback for women and the American democracy. https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/roe-vs-wade-judgement-overturned/
  28. Krishna, G. (2022). Abortion in India: Legal, but not a woman’s right. BMJ, 379. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o2733 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o2733
  29. Kumari, S., & Kishore, J. (2021). Medical termination of pregnancy (Amendment Bill, 2021): Is it enough for Indian women regarding comprehensive abortion care?. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 46(3), 367-369. DOI: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_468_20
  30. Lewis, S. (2021). Full surrogacy now: Feminism against family. Verso Books.
  31. Malagodi, M. (2020). Intersectional inequalities and reproductive rights: An India Nepal comparison. University of Oxford Human Rights Hub Journal, 3(2), 195-201. https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/U-of-OxHRH-J-Intersectional-Inequalities-and-Reproductive-Rights-1.pdf
  32. Malhotra, A; Nyblade, L; Parasuraman, S; Macquarrie, K; Kashyap, P & Walia, S. (2003). Realizing reproductive choice and rights. International Center for Research on Women. https://www.icrw.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Realizing-Reproductive-Rights-and-Choice-Abortion-and-Contraception-India.pdf
  33. Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act 1971. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/15389/1/the_medical_termination_of_pregnancy_act%2C_1971.pdf
  34. Nair, M. (2021). Reproductive health crisis during waves one and two of the COVID-19 pandemic in India: Incidence and deaths from severe maternal complications in more than 202,000 hospital births. EClinical Medicine, 39, 101063.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101063
  35. Nagpal, Sugandha. (2013). Sex-selective abortion in India: Exploring institutional dynamics and responses. McGill Sociological Review. 3,18-35. https://www.mcgill.ca/msr/volume3/article2
  36. Patel, T. (2018). Experiencing abortion rights in India through issues of autonomy and legality: A few controversies. Global Public Health: An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice, 13(6), 702-710. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2018.1424920 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2018.1424920
  37. Pre-Conception and pre-natal diagnostic techniques act 1994. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/8399/1/pre-conception-pre-natal-diagnostic-techniques-act-1994.pdf
  38. Protection of children from sexual offences act 2012. https://legislative.gov.in/sites/default/files/The%20Protection%20of%20Children%20from%20Sexual%20Offences%20Act,%202012_0.pdf
  39. Raman, S. (2022). Abortion is legal in India but rules, stigma make it hard to access. Behan box. https://behanbox.com/2022/05/09/abortion-is-legal-in-india-but-rules-stigma-make-it-hard-to-access/
  40. Ross, L. & Solinger, R. (2017). Reproductive justice. University of California Press.
  41. Ross, L. J. (2017). Reproductive justice as intersectional feminist activism. Souls, 19(3), 286–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999949.2017.1389634 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10999949.2017.1389634
  42. Ross, L., GutiŽrrez, E., Gerber, M., & Silliman, J. (2016). Undivided rights: Women of Color organizing for reproductive justice. Haymarket Books.
  43. SC grants abortion right to unmarried women, acknowledges marital rape (2022, September 29). Mint. https://www.livemint.com/news/india/sc-for-purposes-of-abortion-rape-will-include-marital-rape-11664431136290.html.
  44. Sebastian, M. P., Khan, M. E., & Sebastian, D. (2014). Unintended pregnancy and abortion in India: Country profile report. https://knowledgecommons.popcouncil.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1267&context=departments_sbsr-rh DOI: https://doi.org/10.31899/rh4.1052
  45. Sheriar, N. (2018, April 22). Abortion has been legal in India since 1971 but it is still not a woman’s right. The Print. https://theprint.in/opinion/abortion-has-been-legal-in-india-since-1971-but-it-is-still-not-a-womans-right/51634/
  46. Singh, K. (2022, August 16). Why India’s abortion law still lacks principles of reproductive justice. Behan Box. https://behanbox.com/2022/08/16/why-indias-abortion-law-still-lacks-principles-of-reproductive-justice/https://behanbox.com/2022/08/16/why-indias-abortion-law-still-lacks-principles-of-reproductive-justice/
  47. Singh, S., Hussain, R., Shekhar, C., Acharya, R., Moore, A. M., Stillman, M., ... & Ball, H. (2018). Abortion and unintended pregnancy in six Indian states: Findings and implications for policies and programs.https://www.guttmacher.org/report/abortion-unintended-pregnancy-six-states-india DOI: https://doi.org/10.1363/2018.30009
  48. Silliman, J. Ross, L., GutiŽrrez, E., & Gerber, M. (2016). Undivided rights: Women of color organizing for reproductive justice. Haymarket Books.
  49. Smith, A. (2005). Beyond pro-choice versus pro-life: Women of color and reproductive justice. NWSA Journal, 119–140. https://doi.org/10.2979/NWS.2005.17.1.119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/NWS.2005.17.1.119
  50. Stillman, M., Frost, J. J., Singh, S., Moore, A. M., & Kalyanwala, S. (2014). Abortion in India: A literature review. Guttmacher Institute, 12-14.
  51. Supreme Court, (2017). Independent Thought v. Union of India case. https://blog.ipleaders.in/independent-thought-v-union-of-india/#:~:text=The%20Supreme%20Court%20of%20India,rape%20during%20the%20underage%20marriage.
  52. Suchita Srivastava & Anr vs Chandigarh Administration on 28 August 2009. Bench: K.G. Balakrishnan, P. Sathasivam, B.S. Chauhan. Supreme Court of India. https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1500783/#:~:text=2009%20and%2017.7.,welfare%20institution%20located%20in%20Chandigarh.
  53. Surana, A. (2022).POCSO acts punishment explained. Get Legal India. https://getlegalindia.com/pocso-act-punishment/
  54. Tella, K. K. (2022). Abortion rights, reproductive justice and the state: International perspectives. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003344322
  55. Visaria, L., & Ramachandran, V. (2007). Abortion in India: Ground realities. Routledge.
  56. World Population Prospects (2022). Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division Social Affairs. United Nations. https://population.un.org/wpp/
  57. World Health Organization (2021). Abortion.https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/abortion

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.