Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 8 No. 4 (2021)
Space and Culture, India

Research

Assessing Psychological Effects of Cyberbullying on the Adolescents of a Cosmopolitan City

https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v8i4.1112

Published 2021-03-26

  • Shovan Ghosh
    • ,
  • Sucharita Pramanick

Shovan Ghosh
Associate Professor, Department of Geography, Diamond Harbour Women’s University, Diamond Harbour Road, Sarisha, District: South 24 Pargana, West Bengal, India. Pin-743368

Sucharita Pramanick
Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, Rabindra Mahavidyalaya, Champadanga, District: Hooghly, West Bengal, India, Pin, 71240

Abstract

The popularity of computer-mediated communication and cyber technology has created many new vices in society that obstruct the development of adolescents. One such vice is cyberbullying, which is an insidious and covert form of bullying. The present paper opts to scrutinise cyberbullying's psychological effects on the victim teenagers of minority communities of a cosmopolitan city. Confirmatory factor analysis, for testing the Psychological Effect of Cyberbullying Scale (PECS) comprising 24 direct item pool, was employed to unfold Mild Psychological Effect Scale (MPES) and Intense Psychological Effect Scale (IPES). Cross validating the initial factor structure was conducted with the help of developing standardised coefficient for the two factor model for PECS. Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient values are above 0.09 for the items of both the Mild Psychological Effect Scale (MPES) and Intense Psychological Effect Scale (IPES). Based on purposive sampling, the study found that all the items taken for conducting the survey are highly co-related to the psychological impact of the victim teens of the minority community of the cosmopolitan city. So the PECS developed for measuring the effect has significance. Study results also indicate that the PECS can serve as a valuable tool for measuring the mental impact of cyberbullying among teenagers.

Keywords

Cyberbullying, Minority Community, Psychological Effect, Cosmopolitan, Teenager, Kolkata Municipal Corporation, India

pdf

Author Biography

Shovan Ghosh

Dr. Ghosh, an Associate Professor in the department of Geography, Diamond Harbour Women’s University, South 24 Pargana, West Bengal, has completed his M.A. and Ph.D in Geography from the University of Burdwan, West Bengal. He has secured first position in both under graduation and post-graduation level. He served as an Assistant Professor for more than ten years at Ramananda Centenary College, Purulia, West Bengal. His area of interests lies in Human Geography, Environmental Issues, Education and Geography, Regional planning, Backward Region Development, Urban Planning. His research topic for doctoral thesis was ‘Spatiality, Dichotomy and Problems of High School Education in Hooghly District, West Bengal—Geographical Appraisal’. He has completed UGC research project on ‘The Physico-Societal Barriers of Access and Success of School Education with Reference to Puncha Block of Purulia District—One of the Backward Districts of West Bengal’. He has more than 30 national and international papers, written five chapters in different books and had attended forty five national and international conferences and seminars. He has keen interest on “Multivariate analysis using SPSS, AMOS & R” and got training on that in several workshops. He is associated with several Professional bodies like Indian Geographical Foundation, (IGF) Kolkata, Indian Institute of Geographers, (IIG) University of Pune, Maharastra, Association of Population Geographers of India, (APGI) Punjab University, Punjab,  National Association of Geographers India (NAGI), Department of Geography, Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, Delhi etc. He was awarded Best Paper Presenter in international conference on “Urban development”, organized by Institute for Social development & Research, Ranchi in 2018, India. He performed his duty as Coordinator, NAAC Steering Committee, Ramananda Centenary College College, Purulia and Nodal Officer, for AISHE from 2012 to 2017.  Currently he is supervising 5 research scholars on issues in Human Geography like problems to access to health care facilities of women; urbanisation, technology and quality of life;  cyberspace and cyber culture; language dynamics.

References

  1. Aftab, P. (2000). The parent’s guide to protecting your child in cyberspace (2nd ed.). McGraw Hill.
  2. Aricak, T., Siyahhan, S., & Uzunhasanoglu, A. (2008). Cyberbullying among Turkish adolescents. CyberPsychology & Behaviour, 11(3), 253-261. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2007.0016
  3. Beran, T., & Li, Q. (2005). Cyber harassment: A study of a new method for an old behaviour. Journal of Education Computing Research, 32(3), 265-277. https://doi.org/10.2190/8YQM-B04H-PG4D-BLLH DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/8YQM-B04H-PG4D-BLLH
  4. Best, P., Manktelow, R., & Taylor, B. (2014). Online communication, social media and adolescent wellbeing: A systematic narrative review. Child and Youth Services Review, 41, 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.03.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.03.001
  5. Biswas, M.Z.H. (2015). Socio Economic Conditions of Muslims of West Bengal: An Enquiry to Their Social Exclusion. International Journal of Humanities & Social Science Studies, 2 (2), 259-266. http://oaji.net/articles/2015/1115-1443862461.pdf
  6. Boyd, N. (2000). The beast within: Why men are violent (1st ed.). Greystone Book.
  7. Brown, K., Jackson, M., & Cassidy, W. (2006). Cyber-bullying: Developing policy to direct responses that are equitable and effective in addressing this special form of bullying. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 57, 1-36. http://www.umanitoba.ca/publications/cjeap/articles/brown_jackson_cassidy.html.
  8. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy,57, 1–36. doi:
  9. 1.1.133.8126.
  10. Bureau of Applied Statistics and Economics, Department of Statistics and Program Implementation, Government of West Bengal. District Statistical Handbook, Kolkata (2013). pp.18
  11. Burton, S. (2014). Safegaurding children from online danger. In Burton, S., & Reid, J (Eds)., Safegaurding and protecting children in the early years (1st ed.), 131-146. Routledge.
  12. Byrne, B.M. (2010). Structural equation modelling with AMOS basic concept, applications and programming. Taylor and Francis
  13. Chaudhuri, S. (1990). Calcutta—The Living City, Volume II: The Present and Future, Calcutta. Oxford University Press.
  14. Engfer, L. (2003). India in Pictures. Lerner Publishing Group.
  15. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2001). SPSS for Windows: Step by step. Allyn & Bacon.
  16. Greenfield, P.M., & Cocking, R.R. (2014). Independence and interdependence as developmental scripts: Implications for theory, research and practice. In Greenfield, P.M. & Cocking, R.R (Eds). Cross-culture roots of minority child development (pp. 1-41). New York: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315746555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315746555
  17. Hair, J.R., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Macmillan Publishers.
  18. High, B. (2007). Bullycide in America: Moms speak out about bullying/ suicide connection (1st ed.). Washington: JBS Publishing.
  19. Hinduja, S. & Patchin, J.W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behaviour, 29 (2), 129–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620701457816 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620701457816
  20. Horowitz, M., & Bollinger, D.M. (2014). Cyberbullying in social media within educational institutions: Featuring students, employee and parent information (1st ed.). Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
  21. Kanwal, H.& Jami, H. (2019). Exploring odes, strategies, and psychosocial consequences of Cyberbullying Perpetration and Victimization Among University Students. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 34 (4), 787-817.DOI: 10.33824/PJPR.2019.34.4.43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33824/PJPR.2019.34.4.43
  22. Kowalski, R.M. & Limber, S.P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6 Suppl 1), S22–S30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.017
  23. Lee, S.S., Bashnakova, D., & Goldblatt, J. (2017). The 21st century meeting and event technologies: Powerful tools for better planning, marketing and evaluation (1st ed.). Oakvilla, Canada: Apple Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b19849
  24. Lee, Y. & Wu, W. (2018). Factors in cyberbullying: The attitude- social influence- efficacy model. Anales de Psicologia, 34 (2), 324-331. http://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/ap/v34n2/0212-9728-ap-34-02-323.pdf
  25. Marcum, C.D., & Higgins, G.E., & Ricketts, M.L. (2014). Juveniles and cyber stalking in United States: An analysis of theoretical predictors of patterns of online perpetration. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 8 (1), 47-56. http://www.cybercrimejournal.com/marcumetalijcc2014vol8issue1.pdf
  26. Marczak, M., & Coyne, I. (2015). A focus on online bullying. In Attrill, A (Ed), Cyberpsychology (pp. 147-156). Oxford University Press.
  27. Martin-Dunlop, C., & Fraser, B.J. (2007). Learning environment and attitudes associated with an innovative science course designed for prospective elementary teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 163-190. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10763-007-9070-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9070-2
  28. National Crime Record Bureau, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. Crime in India (2017). pp. 797
  29. Price, M., & Dalgleisa, J. (2010). Cyberbullying: Experience, impacts and coping strategies as described by Australian young People. Young Studies Australia, 29(2), 51-59. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.469.2077&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  30. Shariff, S., & Hoff, D.L. (2007). Clarifying legal boundaries for school supervision in cyber space. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 1(1), 76-118. http://www.cybercrimejournal.com/shaheenhoff.pdf
  31. Singh, G., & Kumar, M. (2014). Exploratory factor analysis of service quality dimensions for higher educational institutes: A students perspective. In Theodore. J. D. (Ed), Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 14(8), 38-48. https://globaljournals.org/GJMBR_Volume14/6-Exploratory-Factor-Analysis.pdf
  32. Skoda, U., & Nielsen, K.B. (2014). Introduction: Navigating exclusion, engineering inclusion. In Skoda, U., Nielsen, K.B., & Fibiger, M. Q (Eds), Navigating social exclusion and inclusion in contemporary India and beyond: Structure, agents, practices (pp. 1-19). Anthem Press
  33. Usher, A. (2010). Expose your hidden talents: Behind the mask (1st ed.). Xlibris Corporation.
  34. Valkenburg, P.M. & Piotrowski, J.T. (2017). Plugged in: How media attract and affect youth. Yale University Press. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/Media/9780300228090_UPDF.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300218879.001.0001
  35. Wall, D.S. (2014). Policing identity crimes. In Wall, D.S., & William, M. (Eds), Policing cybercrime: Networked and social media technologies and challenges for policing (pp. 437-460). Routledge. DOI: 10.1080/10439463.2013.780222 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2013.780222
  36. Welsh Government, United Kingdom (2011). Respecting others: Cyberbullying, guidance Report of Welsh Government, Guidance Document Number: 057/2011. pp. 5-7
  37. Ybarra, M., & Mitchell, K. (2004). Youth engaging in online harassment: Association with caregiver-child relationships, Internet use, and personal characteristics. Journal of Adolescence. 27 (3). 319-336. DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.03.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.03.007

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.