Arora, G (1985). Caste socio-economic status and fertility-a study of proximate determinants of fertility in village Riwasa. Guru Nanak Journal of Sociology, 6(2), 81-96.
Arokiasamy, P., (2002). Gender preference, contraceptive use and fertility in India: Regional and development influences. International Journal of Population Geography, 8(1), 49-67.
Balasubramanian, K., (1984). Hindu-Muslim differentials in fertility and population growth in India: role of proximate variable. Artha Vijnana, 26(3), 189-216.
Barooah, M., (2014). Spatial Pattern and Variation in Literacy among the Scheduled Castes Population in the Brahmaputra Valley, Assam. Space and Culture, India, 2(1), 24-32. https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v2i1.68
Basu, A. M. (2002). Why does education lead to lower fertility? A critical review of some of the possibilities. World Development.30 (10):1779-1790.
Bhagat, R. B. &Praharaj, P. (2005). Hindu-Muslim fertility differentials. Economic and Political Weekly, 411-418.
Bhat, P. N. M. (2002). Returning a favor: Reciprocity between female education and fertility in India.World Development, 30(10), 1791-1803.
Bhattacharyya, Rituparna, (2009). Examining the changing status and role of middle class Assamese women: Lessons from the lives of university students, PhD thesis. Newcastle University, UK.
Bhattacharyya, R., (2013). Are We Empowered? Stories of young Indian working women, Saarbrücken, Germany: Lap Lambert Academic Publishing, (ISBN: 978-3-659-20580-4)
Bhattacharyya, Rituparna and Singh, Suman(2018). Exclusion (and seclusion): Geographies of Disowned Widows of India, GeoJournal, 83 (4), 757–774, DOI: 10.1007/s10708-017-9800-0
Census of India (2011). Fertility Tables (F-Series). Registrar General India: New Delhi.
Das, K., & Das, M., (2018). Women And Wedlock: A Study On Female Marital Status Among the Hindus, Muslims and Christians of Assam, India. Space and Culture, India, 6(1), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v6i1.294
Das, N and D Pandey (1985). Fertility differentials by religion in India: An analysis of 1971 census fertility data. Canadian Studies in Population, 12(2), 119-136.
Das, N., (1987). Sex preference and fertility behavior: A study of recent Indian data. Demography, 24(4), 517-530.
Day, L. H. (1984). Minority-group status and fertility: a more detailed test of hypothesis. The Sociological Quarterly, 25(4), 456-472.
Edmeades, J., Pande, R. P., Falle, T., & Krishnan, S. (2011). Son preference and sterilisation use among young married women in two slums in Bengaluru city, India. Global public health, 6(4), 407-420.
Frejka, T. &Sardon, J. P. (2007). Cohort birth order, parity progression ratio and parity distribution trends in developed countries. Demographic Research, 16(11), 315-374.
Goldscheider, C and Uhlenberg, P. R. (1969). Minority group status and fertility. American Journal of Sociology, 74(4), 361-373.
Haque, I., & Patel, P. P. (2016).Assessing Hindu-Muslim Fertility Differentials in West Bengal: Insights from the National Family Health Survey-3 Data. Journal of Family History, 41(2), 192-224.
Holzer-Zelazewska, D., &Tymicki, K., (2009).Cohort and period fertility of Polish women 1945-2008. Studia Demograficzne, 155(1), 48-69.
Iyer, S., (2002). Demography and religion in India. Oxford University Press, USA.
Jalil, A., Zakar, R., Usman, A., &Amjad, A. (2016).Determinants of fertility and fertility preferences in Pakistan: Comparative Secondary Analysis of PDHS 2007-2013. Pakistan Journal of Gender Studies, 12, 19-38.
Kulkarni, P. M. (March 2002). Special Population Groups. In SEMINAR, New-Delhi, 58-86, MALIYIKA SINGH.
Mistry, M. B., (1994).Hindu-Muslim fertility differentials in India. Journal Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs, 15(1-2), 171-182.
Mutharayappa, R., (1997). Son preference and its effect on fertility in India.
Patidar, H., (2018). Women’s Empowerment and Fertility Behaviour among the Tribals of Rajasthan, India. Space And Culture, India, 5(3), 129-139. doi:10.20896/saci.v5i3.285
Population Reference Bureau, (2017). To New Policy, briefs focus on sustainable development goals in Pakistan and Malawi. http://www.prb.org/Publications/Reports/2017/From-the-Health-Policy-Plus-Project.aspx
Ramesh, P., (2007). Analysis of fertility differentials among caste groups in Andhra Pradesh (An).
Rasheed, N. Khan, Z. Khalique, N. Siddiqui, A. R.&, Hakim, S. (2015). Family planning differentials among religious groups: A study in India. International Journal of Medicine and Public Health, 5(1).
Reddy, P. H., (2003). Religion, population growth, fertility and family planning practice in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 3500-3509.
Risley, H. H., (1891). The tribes and castes of Bengal, Government of India, 1, Calcutta.
Roy, S., Singh, K.K., Singh, B. P., Gupta, K. (2015).Study of the influence of caste differentials on fertility and contraception. Journal of Statistics Application and Prob. Letters, 2, 149-160.
Shariff, A., (1995). Socio-economic and demographic differentials between Hindu and Muslim in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 2947-2952.
Som, K. S. and Mishra, R. P. (2017a). Education, religion, development and regional patterns of fertility in West Bengal. Indian Journal of Spatial Science. 8(1): 1-8, Spring Issues.
Som, K., & Mishra, R. P. (2017b). An Inter-District Efficiency Measurement of RCH Program Using Data Envelopment Analysis in Madhya Pradesh, India. Space and Culture, India, 5(2), 84-96. https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v5i2.267
Som, K. S., & Mishra, R. P. (2014). BIMARU States: Need a Rethinking. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(7), 34-41. doi: 10.9790/0837-19713441
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2009). World Marriage Data 2008 (POP/DB/Marr/ Rev2008).
Visaria, Leela, (1974). Religious Differentials in Fertility. In Ashis Bose et al. (eds.), Population in India’s Development,1947-2000, Vikas Publishing House, Delhi.
Yadava, R. C., Kumar, A., & Pratap, M. (2009). Estimation of parity progression ratios from open and closed birth interval data. Journal of Data Science, 11(3), 607-621.
- Abstract viewed - 76 times
- pdf downloaded - 50 times
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© Kalyan Sundar Som, R. P. Mishra, 2019
Kalyan Sundar Som
Dr. Harisingh Gour Central University
R. P. Mishra
Department of General and Applied Geography, Dr. Harisingh Gour Central University
How to Cite
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Kalyan Sundar Som, Professor R. P. Mishra, An Inter-District Efficiency Measurement of RCH Program Using Data Envelopment Analysis in Madhya Pradesh, India , Space and Culture, India: Vol 5 No 2 (2017): Space and Culture, India
An Inter-District Efficiency Measurement of RCH Program Using Data Envelopment Analysis in Madhya Pradesh, India
Vol 5 No 2 (2017): Space and Culture, India
Submitted: Jul 17, 2017
Published: Nov 28, 2017
Reproductive Child Health (RCH) programme is one of the most important programmes for reproductive women and child health development in India and Madhya Pradesh, the Empowered Action Group (EAG) is one of them. Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method, this study calculates and analyses the technical efficiency of RCH programme in Madhya Pradesh. The main objective was to assess the degree of efficiency of RCH programme in the districts of Madhya Pradesh and to recommend performance targets for those districts, which come under inefficient technical inefficiency.
The findings show that 64.45 per cent of the districts of the state are technically inefficient and scale inefficient; and used more resources that they actually did not need. The results broadly pointed out to grave inefficiency in the RCH at district level and that significant amounts of resources could be saved if measures were put to curb the wastage.