Asad, T. (1986). The Idea of an Anthropology of Islam. Washington DC: Center for Contemporary Arab Studies.
Amber, S. (2011, September). All India Muslim Women Law Board. Retrieved 9 December 2013, from www.muslimwomenpersonallaws.com.
Austin, G. (2004). Working A Democratic Constitution: A History of the Indian Experience. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Baxamusa, R. (1994). Need for Change in the Muslim Personal Law Relating to Divorce in India.
Basu, P. (2010). Post Modernism, Marxism, Postcolonialism. Kolkata: Avenel Press.
Bowden, P., & J. Mummery (2012). Understanding Feminism. New Delhi: Rawat Publications.
De, R. (2013, 21 August). Personal Laws: A Reality Check. Frontline
Engineer, A. A. (2013). Islam, Women and Gender Justice. New Delhi: Gyan Publishing House.
Engineer, A. A. (1999). The Quran, Women and Modern Society. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers Private Limited.
Engineer, I. (2012). 'Political Leadership, Mobilisation and Violence', in A. Shaban, (ed.) Lives of Muslims in India: Politics, Exclusion and Violence, New Delhi: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/ Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings - 1972-77, trans. Gordon et al. New York: Pantheon Books.
Howarth, D. (2002). Discourse. New Delhi: Viva Books Private Limited.
Hasan, Z. (2000), Politics and the State in India, New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Khanam, S. (2004, August 21). Women's Mosque Planned. Retrieved 9 December 2013, from www.stepswomensjamat.com.
Kirmani, N. (2009). Claiming Their Space: Muslim Women-led Networks and Women's Movement in India, International Journal of Women's Studies, Volume 9.
Kumar, A. (2006, 3rd January). Gudiya Dies. Retrieved 8 October 2014, from www.thehindu.com.
Mahmood, S. (2004). Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Mackinnon, C. A (1989), Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Menon, H. Z. (2004). Unequal Citizens: A Study of Muslim Women in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Manger, L. (2013). Muslim Diversity: Local Islam in Local Contexts. Routledge: London.
Naheed, U. (2009, 11 July), Muslim Women in India Are in Miserable Condition. Retrieved 10 December 2013, from www.islamicterrorism.wordpress.com.
Shaban, A. (2012). Introduction. In A. Shaban (ed.), Lives of Muslims in India (pp. 17-20), New Delhi: Routledge.
Sarkar, M. (2008). Visible Histories Disappearing Women: Producing Muslim Womanhood in Late Colonial Bengal. New Delhi: Kali for Women.
Wadud, A. (1999), Quran and Woman: Reading the Sacred Text from a Woman's Perspective. New Delhi: Oxdord University Press.
Weedon, J. (1987). Discourses on Several Subjects. Gale ECCO Print Editions.
- Abstract viewed - 426 times
- PDF downloaded - 319 times
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© Esita Sur, 2016
Scottish Church College, Kolkata
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Esita Sur, Revisiting the Marginal Locations of Muslim Women on Various Sites in India , Space and Culture, India: Vol 1 No 3 (2014): Space and Culture, India
- Esita Sur, Triple Talaq Bill in India: Muslim Women as Political Subjects or Victims? , Space and Culture, India: Vol 5 No 3 (2018): Space and Culture, India
- Esita Sur, Searching and Researching for Located Narratives as Data of the ‘Other’ , Space and Culture, India: Vol 7 No 1 (2019): Space and Culture, India
Searching and Researching for Located Narratives as Data of the ‘Other’
Vol 7 No 1 (2019): Space and Culture, India
Submitted: Dec 29, 2018
Published: Jun 30, 2019
In social science research, methodology plays a significant role in constructing and shaping knowledge; the domain of methodology is equally contested and politicised. Therefore, studying gender and disability has been challenging, as it carries a Western, masculine and objective context. The paper tries to argue that the notions of gender and disability demand a more contextualised and embedded methodologies, which can highlight the possibility of multiple truths and situated knowledge of the marginalised. It also voices a need for a more indigenous methodology to address the questions on gender and disability in India; however, it does neither reject the western canons of work nor the non-indigenous researchers but opens up a more embedded way of thinking.