Main Article Content
This research explores the design of products based on users’ emotional requirements and how students can be stimulated to generate novel ideas in design education. In order to achieve these aims, multiple methods were taught to students during an online course. In the first step, the students utilised interviews, questionnaires, and mixed perspectives to design hill censers according to the users’ emotional requirements. In the second step, the researcher conducted a qualitative thematic analysis to study the students’ collected survey reports. The analytic results were then shared with students to help them quickly obtain better novel design ideas. And then, an emotional design appraisal model was built in the third step. The two main findings are as follows: first, creation in light of the stakeholder’s perspective enabled the students to come up with better design ideas quickly. Second, the ‘design method’ and ‘emotional experience’ themes obtained by the thematic analysis were found to be vital for the designers/students. Notably, the ‘design method’ theme can help students generate novel design ideas, and the students can learn the users’ needs from the ‘emotional experience’ theme.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Astuti, T. (2020). The dynamic of performing social relations amongst managers and supervisors : A Thematic Analysis. TQR: Where the World Comes to Learn Qualitative Research. 25(3), 700–720. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol25/iss3/10/
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lin X. J., (2008). Boshanlu Verificine. Sichuan Cultural Relics. 3, 65–67.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Sáenz, D. C., Domínguez, C. E. D., Llorach-Massana, P., García, A. A., & Arellano, J. L. H. (2019). A series of recommendations for industrial design conceptualizing based on emotional design. Managing Innovation in Highly Restrictive Environments, 167-185
Shao, X. L., (2016). A renewed study on Boshan incense burners: origins and other issues. Journal of National Museum of China, 5, 52–61.
Shroyer, K., Lovins, T., Turns, J., Cardella, M. E., & Atman, C. J. (2018). Timescales and ideaspace: An examination of idea generation in design practice. Design Studies, 57, 9–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.03.004
Smeenk, W, Tomico, O., Turnhout, van, Smeenk, W., & Tomico, O. (2016). A systematic analysis of mixed perspectives in empathic design: not one perspective encompasses all. International Journal of Design, 10(2), 31–48.
Stranges, M. K. W., Ul Haq, S., & Dunn, D. G. (2014). Black-out test versus UV camera for corona inspection of HV motor stator endwindings. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 50(5), 3135–3140. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2014.2306979
Tomico, O., Winthagen, V. O., & Van Heist, M. M. G. (2012). Designing for, with or within: 1st, 2nd and 3rd person points of view on designing for systems. NordiCHI 2012: Making Sense Through Design - Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1145/2399016.2399045
Vaismoradi, M., & Snelgrove, S. (2019). Theme in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3376
Van Gorp, T., & Adams, E. (2012). Design for Emotion. Elsevier
Yu, Q. H., (2012). The research about the art of creation of censer from the Warring States Period to the Song Dynasty. Beijing Arts and Crafts Press.