Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Minimising Intercultural Communication Difficulties when Teaching International Students with the Help of an Electronic Educational Complex


This study describes the use of an electronic educational complex for international engineering students. While doing so, it analyses whether the studied complex can reduce intercultural interaction difficulties and thus become a motivating factor in the educational process as a whole.


Electronic Educational Complex; Modular-Rating Technology; Visualisation of Functioning Schemes; Intercultural Communication



  1. Agyei, D. D., & Voogt, J. M. (2011). Exploring the potential of the will, skill, tool model in Ghana: Predicting prospective and practicing teachers’ use of technology. Computers & Education, 56(1), 91-100. DOI:
  2. Aixia, D., & Wang, D. (2011). Factors influencing learner attitudes toward e-learning and development of e-learning environment based on the integrated e-learning platform. International Journal of eEducation, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 1(3), 264-268. DOI:
  3. Aktaruzzaman, M., Shamim, M., & Clement, C. (2011). Trends and issues to integrate ICT in teaching learning for the future world of education. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 11(3), 114-119.
  4. AL-Hunaiyyan, A., Al-Huwail, N., & Al-Sharhan, S. (2008). Blended e-learning design: Discussion of cultural issues. International Journal of Cyber Society and Education, 1(1), 17-32.
  5. Azad, A. K. (Ed.). (2011). Internet accessible remote laboratories: Scalable e-Learning tools for engineering and science disciplines: Scalable e-Learning tools for Engineering and Science disciplines. IGI Global. DOI:
  6. Banday, M. T., Ahmed, M., & Jan, T. R. (2014). Applications of e-Learning in engineering education: A case study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 406-413. DOI:
  7. Benchicou, S., Aichouni, M., & Nehari, D. (2010). E-learning in engineering education: a theoretical and empirical study of the Algerian higher education institution. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(3), 325-343. DOI:
  8. Borrego, M., Foster, M. J., & Froyd, J. E. (2014). Systematic literature reviews in engineering education and other developing interdisciplinary fields. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 45-76. DOI:
  9. Cagiltay, N. E. (2008). Using learning styles theory in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33(4), 415-424. DOI:
  10. Choshanov, М. А. (1997). Didactic design of a flexible teaching technology. Pedagogika, 2, 21-29.
  11. Ebner, M., & Holzinger, A. (2007). Successful implementation of user-centered game based learning in higher education: An example from civil engineering. Computers & Education, 49(3), 873-890. DOI:
  12. Epifanov, A. E., Bratanovskii, S. N., & Vasilyeva, E. N. (2019). Integrated arrangement of communication in the Russian Federation: The information and legal aspect. In Ubiquitous Computing and the Internet of Things: Prerequisites for the Development of ICT (pp. 101-106). Springer, Cham. DOI:
  13. Hamilton, E., Lesh, R., Lester, F. R. A. N. K., & Brilleslyper, M. (2008). Model-eliciting activities (MEAs) as a bridge between Engineering Education research and Mathematics education research. Advances in Engineering Education, 1(2), n2.
  14. Hisham, M. H. M., Saud, M. S., & Kamin, Y. (2018). E-Learning as cooperative problem based learning (CPBL) support elements in Engineering education. Advanced Science Letters, 24(6), 4026-4029. DOI:
  15. Ilyashenko, L. K. (2017). Modular training as a contemporary form of educational process' organisation in studying of humanitarian disciplines in Russian universities. Man in India, 97(20), 37-44.
  16. Kagermann, H. (2015). Change through digitisation – Value creation in the age of Industry 4.0. In Management of permanent change (pp. 23-45). Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. DOI:
  17. Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R. A., & Baek, J. Y. (2014). Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching. Routledge. DOI:
  18. Klamma, R., Chatti, M., Duval, E., Hummel, H., Hvannberg, E. T., Kravcik, M., ... Scott, P. (2007). Social software for life-long learning. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 72-83.
  19. Lucke, T., Dunn, P. K., & Christie, M. (2017). Activating learning in engineering education using ICT and the concept of ‘Flipping the classroom. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(1), 45-57. DOI:
  20. Nikolaeva, Y. V., Grimalskaya, S. A., Petrosyants, D. V., Zulfugarzade, T. E., Maystrovich, E. V., & Shestak, V. A. (2018). Philosophical View of Multiculturalism in Modern European Cinematography. European Journal of Science and Theology, 14(6), 205-214.
  21. Perminov, E. A., Gadjiev, D. D., & Abdurazakov, M. M. (2019). About relevance of fundamentalisation of mathematical training of students of the pedagogical directions during the digital era. The Education and science journal, 21(5), 86-111. (In Russian) DOI:
  22. Pitchian, A. S., & Churchill, D. (2002). E-Learning design for engineering education. In Fourth Asia-Pacific Conference on Problem-Based Learning, Hatyai, Songkola, Thailand.
  23. Sabirova, F. M. (2016). Study of the contribution of Nobel Prize winners to the development of atomic and nuclear physics in pedagogical universities. European Journal of Science and Theology, 12(1), 69-80.
  24. Sanganyado, E., & Nkomo, S. (2018). Incorporating Sustainability into Engineering and Chemical Education Using E-Learning. Education Sciences, 8(2), 39. DOI:
  25. Shestak, V. A., & Volevodz, A. G. (2019). Modern requirements of the legal support of artificial intelligence: a view from Russia. Russian Journal of Criminology, 13(2), 197-206. (In Russian). DOI:
  26. Slabin, U. K. (2019). Knowledge and perception of eponyms in Chemistry by university students in Belarus and the United States. The Education and science journal, 21(7), 113-142. (In Russian) DOI:
  27. Solodikhina, M. V., & Solodikhina, A. A. (2019). Development of critical thinking of Master’s degree students using STEM cases. The Education and Science Journal, 21(3), 125-153. (In Russian) DOI:
  28. Šverc, M., Pesek, I., & Flogie, A. (2014). The challenges of complete informatisation of education. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 61, 121-131.
  29. Tarhini, A., Hone, K. S., & Liu, X. (2013). Factors affecting students’ acceptance of e-learning environments in developing countries: a structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 3(1), 54-59. DOI:
  30. Zhang, P., & Bhattacharyya, S. (2008). Students’ views of a learning management system: A longitudinal qualitative study. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 23(1), 20. DOI:


Download data is not yet available.