Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 7 No. 4 (2020)
Space and Culture, India

Perspective

Social Preservation of Traditional Administration of Indigenous Peoples — The Ho Tribe in India

https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v7i4.576

Published 2020-03-29

  • Christina Deogam

Christina Deogam
Ranchi University, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India

Abstract

Indigenous peoples have distinguished cultural traditions and linguistic identity. Across the world, Indigenous peoples have always asked the State to recognise their social structure and opportunities to preserve their traditional lifestyles. The issues at stake are their rights over habitat and natural resources and the need to curtail private and public sector exploitation through alien hands. Due to the need to survive, helplessness and systematically forced assimilation, the traditional fabric of their culture are being distorted and defaced. This study deals with the concerns and issues relating to the protection of identity, tradition and customs of Ho tribe that inhabits the West Singhbhum in the State of Jharkhand in India.

Keywords

Traditional administration; Ho tribe; social preservation; West Singhbhum; Jharkhand; Munda- Manki system

Pdf

References

  1. Aiyesha, A. (2017, 17 January). Preservation of heritage and tribal culture. Retrieved on 15 September 2018 from, http://www.slideahare.net/mobile/meakham15/0-preservation-of-heritage-and-tribal-culture.
  2. Behera, P. (2015). Understanding the concept of tribal self-rules in Jharkhand, India. Indian Journal of Dalit and Tribal Studies and Action, 3(2), 88-105. Retrieved on 22 November 2018 from, http://www.ticijournals.org/understanding-the-concept-of-tribal-self-rule-in-jharkhand-india
  3. Crook, R. (2005). The role of traditional institutions in political change and development, CDD/ODI Policy Brief No. 4. Retrieved on 04 September 2019 from, https://www.odi.org/resources
  4. Hanson, E. (2009). UN declaration on the rights of Indigenous Peoples. Indigenous foundations.arts.ubc.ca. Retrieved on 23 December 2019 from, http://indigenousfoundations.arts.ubc.ca/un_declaration_on_the_rights_of_indigenous_peoples/
  5. Holzinger, K., Kern, F. G., & Kromrey, D. (2016). The Dualism of Contemporary Traditional Governance and the State: Institutional Setups and Political Consequences. Political Research Quarterly, 69(3), 469–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916648013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916648013
  6. Indigenous corporate training inc. (2014). Working effectively with indigenous peoples blog. UN declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples. Retrieved on 23 December 2019 from, https://www.ictinc.ca/united-nations-declaration-on-the-rights-of-indigenous-peoples-snapshot
  7. Joshua project (2020). Ho in India. Retrieved on 20 January 2020 from, http://www.joshuaproject.net/people_groups/16944/IN
  8. Mankiller, W. (2009). Being indigenous in the 21st century. Cultural Survival Quarterly Magazine, 33(1A). Retrieved on 10 September 2018 from, http://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/being-indegenous-21st-century.
  9. Orji, K. & Olali, S. (2010). Traditional Institutions and their Dwindling Roles in contemporary Nigeria: the rivers state example. In T. Babawale, A. Aloa & B. Adesoji, (eds.) The Chieftaincy Institution in Nigeria, Lagos: Concept Publication Ltd.
  10. Srivastava, M. (2007). The Sacred Complex of Munda Tribe, The Anthropologist, 9(4), pp 327-330, DOI: 10.1080/09720073.2007.11891020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2007.11891020
  11. United Nations Development Program (2018). Indigenous peoples. Retrieved on 21 November 2018 from,https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/2030-agenda-for-sustainable-development/peace/governance/indigenous-peoples.html
  12. United Nations (2020). Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Frequently Asked Questions. Retrieved on 27 September 2019 from, https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/faq_drips_en.pdf

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.