Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

The Profitability of Paddy Cultivation and Farmers’ Perception in West Bengal with Special Reference to Purba Bardhaman District


Many economists and experts opined that agriculture is an unprofitable activity in India nowadays, mainly because of increasing cost and low prices of farm produce. However, during the field survey in Galsi-I and Galsi-II Blocks of Purba Bardhaman, it was observed that many farmers do not think so. In this context, using the secondary data on the cost of paddy cultivation for the period 1996–97 to 2015–16, this paper analyses the cost and returns from paddy cultivation in West Bengal. It is observed that the cost has increased at a very high rate. Paid out cost at current prices during the last decade has increased by 12.1 per cent per annum. However, they do not realise the right price of their produce, and consequently, the profit margin has declined. Data reveal that farmers incurred losses in paddy cultivation upto 14 times except for in 2007–08 and in 2009–10 during 2000–01 to 2015–16. They are also being deprived of getting even the minimum support prices (MSP) due to loopholes in government initiatives. Using primary data, this paper explains why many farmers think that paddy cultivation is still a profitable activity. In doing so, the research finds that they miscalculate the cost of cultivation and that is why they perceive the profit margin to be higher. The kinds of cost that they do not calculate include family labour, depreciation charge, interest on capital, the rental value of owned land, and others. Another cause for exaggerated profit is that farmers include income from paddy business as return from agriculture.


Cost of Cultivation, Average Net Return, Farmers’ Perception, Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR), Purba Bardhaman, West Bengal, India



  1. Biru, B. K., & Barpujari, I. (n.d.). Jan Sunwai on the present agrarian crisis. Gene Campaign, 1– 42. Retrieved on February 8, 2019, from
  2. Budget 2019: Modi govt’s new scheme offers Rs 6000 directly into farmers’ bank accounts. (2019, February 1). Business Today. Retrieved on February 8, 2019 from
  3. Chand, R., Lakshmi Prassana, P. A., & Singh, A. (2011). Farm size and productivity: Understanding the strengths of smallholders and improving their livelihoods. Economic and Political Weekly, XLVI (26&27), 5–11.
  4. Chand, R., Saxena, R., & Rana, S. (2015). Estimates and analysis of farm income in India, 1983–84 to 2011–12. Economic and Political Weekly, 50 (22), 139–145.
  5. Dev, S. M., & Rao, N. C. (2010). Agricultural price policy, farm profitability and food security. Economic and Political Weekly. XLV (26–27), 174–182.
  6. Directorate of Economics and Statistics. (n.d.). Cost of Cultivation/Production and Related Data. Retrieved from
  7. Gaurav, S., & Mishra, S. (2011). Size class and return to cultivation: A cold case reopened. Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai. 1–24. Retrieved on August 27, 2018, from
  8. Krishak Bandhu: Mamata announces sops for farmers. (2018, December 31). The Hindu. Retrieved on February 8, 2019, from
  9. Langa, M., & Sriram, J. (2017, June 10). Farmers’ protest: Fault lines in the fields. The Hindu. Retrieved on December 4, 2018, from
  10. Mohanty, B. K. (2018, December 3). Why our farmers are so angry. The Telegraph, p. 1.
  11. Narayanamoorthy, A. (2013). Profitability in crops cultivation in India: Some evidence from cost of cultivation survey data. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68 (1), 104–121.
  12. Narayanamoorthy, A., Alli, P., & Suresh, R. (2014). How profitable is cultivation of rainfed crops? Some insights from cost of cultivation studies. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 27 (2), 231–241. DOI:
  13. Nath, S.K. (2008). Manual on Cost of Cultivation Surveys,Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India. Retrieved from
  14. Posani, B. (2009). Crisis in the countryside: Farmer suicides and The Political Economy of Agrarian Distress in India (No. 09-95). London. Retrieved on February 25, 2018, from
  15. Pushpa., Srivastava, S. K., & Agarwal, P. K. (2017). Comparative study on cost of cultivation and economic returns from major crops in eastern region of Uttar Pradesh. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology, 10 (3), 387–399. Retrieved on September 1, 2018, from DOI:
  16. Raghavan, M. (2008). Changing pattern of input use and cost of cultivation. Economic and Political Weekly, 43 (26–27), 123–129.
  17. Ranganathan, T.(2015). Farmers’ income in India: Evidence from Secondary Data. Agricultural Situation in India, 72 (3), 30–70, Institute of Economic Growth, New Delhi.
  18. Rao, C. H. H. (2004). Preface to millennium study. In G.S Bhalla, Globalisation and Indian Agriculture, New Delhi, India: Academic Foundation.
  19. Ray, S. (2007). Economic policy and agriculture. In Shovan Ray (Ed.), Handbook of agriculture in India, New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press, 34–56.
  20. Shroff, S.(2019, April 8). Rethinking India’s battles against chronic agrarian distress. The Hindu Centre for Politics and Public Policy. Retrieved on April 20, 2019, from
  21. Srinivasan, P.V. (2007). Agriculture and food security. In Shovan Ray (Ed.), Handbook of Agriculture in India, New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press, 130–167.
  22. Srivastava, S. K., Chand, R., & Singh, J. (2017). Changing crop production cost in India: Input prices, substitution and technological effects. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 30, 171–182. DOI:
  23. Swaminathan, M. S. (2016). National policy for farmers: Ten years later. Review of Agrarian Studies, 6(1), 133–144. Retrieved on August 27, 2018, from
  24. Tripathi, A. K. (2013). Agricultural price policy, output and farm profitability— examining linkages during postreform period in India. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, 10 (1), 91–111.
  25. Why the farmers have stormed Delhi, what they want. (2018, Nov 30). The Economic Times. Retrieved on December 3, 2018, from


Download data is not yet available.