Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 7 No. 4 (2020)
Space and Culture, India

Perspective

Cultural/Social Media Space of the Digital Generation

https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v7i4.535

Published 2020-03-29

  • Dinara R. Saparova
    • ,
  • Almagul M. Kanagatova
    • ,
  • Albina S. Zhanbosinova
    • ,
  • Yelena Y. Chzhan

Dinara R. Saparova
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University

Almagul M. Kanagatova
Almaty University of Management

Albina S. Zhanbosinova
S. Amanzholov East Kazakhstan State University

Yelena Y. Chzhan
S. Amanzholov East Kazakhstan State University

Abstract

Taking the example of Kazakhstan, this study examines the formation and analysis of the cultural media space of the digital generation. Information and communication technologies are the basis of a communicative media environment that has an internal regulated structure, which affects the socialisation of a person. The content of the cultural media space of the digital generation is formed on the basis of digital technologies and represents people’s visual worldview with images, signs and symbols.

The processes of transformation of society affect the young generation and the content of the media space that determines their social and ethnocultural identity. The study presents the results of working with schoolchildren and students aged 14-18 using focus groups to explore the impact of digital culture (media culture) on adolescents in Kazakhstan. Based on the interdisciplinary approach, the findings demonstrate intergenerational contradictions because of the active involvement of Kazakhstan in the global internet community. The cultural media space of Kazakhstan has been shaping the social communications of the digital generation that has grown up in a sovereign state. The theoretical concepts of P. Bourdieu, C. Mannheim and other scientists served as a methodology for this study. Based on the interdisciplinary approach, the findings demonstrate intergenerational contradictions because of the active involvement of Kazakhstan in the global internet community. The findings also unravel that the transformation of the value orientations of adolescents is influenced by the factors of geographical location and ethnicity.

Keywords

digital generation, media space, social platform, communications

Pdf

References

  1. Albert, D. (2015). Social Media in Music Education: Extending Learning to Where Students "Live". Music Educators Journal, 102(2), 31-38. doi:10.1177/0027432115606976 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432115606976
  2. Baron, N.S. (2017). Reading in a digital age. Phi Delta Kappa, 99(2), 15–20. doi:10.1177/0031721717734184 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721717734184
  3. Bolin, G. (2016). Media generations: experience, identity and mediatised social change. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315694955
  4. Bhattacharyya, R. (2009). Examining the Changing Status and Role of Middle Class Assamese Women: Lessons from the Lives of University Students, Department of Geography, University of Newcastle. Retrieved from http://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/303
  5. Bourdieu, P. (2005). Social Space: Fields and Practices (pp. 576). St.Petersburg. Aletheia; M.: Institute of Experimental Sociology.
  6. Carstensen, T. (2015). The Internet as Material Object in Social Practices: Recording and Analysis of Human-Internet Interactions. Nature and Culture, 10(3), 284-302. doi:10.3167/nc.2015.100303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2015.100303
  7. Cheremisova, I. (2016). Content Analysis of the Pages of Active Users of the Vkontakte social network. Vestnik of Volzhskyi State University. Series 11. Natural Sciences, 2(16), 74-80. doi:10.15688/jvolsu11.2016.2.9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu11.2016.2.9
  8. Duncum, P. (2015). Digital Networking as a Creative Resource and Platform. Visual Arts Research, 41(2), 43-53. doi:10.5406/visuartsrese.41.2.0043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5406/visuartsrese.41.2.0043
  9. Godik, Yu.O. (2011). Threats and Risks to the Safety of Child and Adolescent Audiences of New Media. "Mediascope" Electronic scientific journal, 2, 1-6.
  10. Green, H., & Hannon, C. (2007). Young people are spending their time in a space which adult find difficult to supervise or understand. Their Space Education for digital generation (pp. 80). United Kingdom: Demos.
  11. Inglehart, R., & Welzel, K. (2011). Modernization, cultural changes and democracy: The sequence of human development (pp. 12-13). M.: New Publishing.
  12. Jussupov, M., Bozhkarauly, A., & Rustembekova, D. (2018). Formation and Development of State Migration Policy. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 9(5 (35)), 1643-1652. doi: 10.14505/jarle.v9.5(35).16
  13. Kaldygulova, A., & Kosnazarov, D. (2017). Gen Z. Five shades of the generation Z. Narxoz. Business Review, 2(2), 10-17.
  14. Levy, P. (1997). Cyberculture (pp. 222). Paris, Editions Odile Jacob.
  15. Luhmann, N. (2005). The Reality of Mass Media (pp. 256). M.: Praxis.
  16. Mannheim, K. (2000). Essays on the sociology of knowledge: The problem of generations - competition - economic ambitions (pp. 162). M.: INION RAS.
  17. Mead, M. (1983). Culture and the world of childhood. Selected Works (pp. 285). M. Maclay Institute of Ethnography, Ethnographic Library Series. Moscow: Nauka.
  18. Montgomery, K. (2000). Children's Media Culture in the New Millennium: Mapping the Digital Landscape. The Future of Children, 10(2), 145-167. doi:10.2307/1602693. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1602693
  19. Sparks & Honey (2015). Meet generation Z: forget everything you learned about millennials (pp. 46). Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/sparksandhoney/generation-z-final-june-17
  20. Mesch, G. (2009). The Internet and youth culture. The Hedgehog Review, 11(1), 50-53.
  21. Nair, P. (2016). The Indian Child: Growing Young, Urbane and Liberal with Digital Games. Indian Anthropologist, 46(1), 79-92.
  22. Oldenburg, O. (1999). The great good place (pp. 67). New York: Marlowe&Company.
  23. Owen, S. (2018). The Gen Z equation, WGSN Project, Digital Media & Marketing. Retrieved from https://www.wgsn.com/blogs/wgsn-look-gen-z-equation/
  24. Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2011). Children of the digital era (pp. 368). M.: Eksmo.
  25. Parsons, T. (2002). On social systems (pp. 832). M.: Academic project.
  26. Pochebut, L. (2012). Cross-cultural and ethnic psychology: Study Guide (pp. 245). St. Petersburg: Peter.
  27. Popovkin, A.V., & Popovkina, G.S. (2019). Healing by Logos: Christian Aspects of Certain Modern Psycho-Pedagogical Practices. The Education and science journal, 21(7), 143-163 (In Russian). doi:10.17853/1994-5639-2019-7-143-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2019-7-143-164
  28. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon MCB University Press, 9(5), 1-6. doi:10.1108/10748120110424816 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
  29. Sergeeva, U. (2018). Social networks in 2018: global study. Retrieved from https://www.web-canape.ru/business/socialnye-seti-v-2018-godu-globalnoe-issledovanie
  30. Shehabat, A., Mitew, T., & Alzoubi, Y. (2017). Encrypted Jihad: Investigating the Role of Telegram App in Lone Wolf Attacks in the West. Journal of Strategic Security, 10(3), 27-53. doi:10.5038/1944-0472.10.3.1604 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.10.3.1604
  31. Shehabat, A., & Mitew, T. (2018). Black-boxing the Black Flag: Anonymous Sharing Platforms and ISIS Content Distribution Tactics. Perspectives on Terrorism, 12(1), 81-99.
  32. Stillman, D., & Stillman I. (2018). Generation Z at work. How to understand and find common language (pp. 270). Translated from English. M.: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber.
  33. Zhana Urpakh (2017). Retrieved on 01 January 2019 from, https://zhanaurpak.kz/nash-lider/

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.