Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Networking Cooperation in Forming Soft Skills of a New Type of Teacher


The primary aim of this research is to develop an effective network interaction model in developing a new teacher’s soft skills. The authors carried out an analysis of a new teacher’s necessary soft skills and the existing models of partnerships. They outlined their views on the development of a networking model that is aimed at the systematic formation of a teacher’s soft skills. The empirical part is executed based on the Elabuga Institute of the Kazan Federal University. The created model can be used for the organisation of training system of a new type of teacher. It might as well be used as a model of the school-university partnership for revealing pedagogically gifted children or as an integrated model for the formation of basic teachers’ soft skills in the university.


Networking; Networking Cooperation Models; Soft Skills; New-Type Teacher; Outcomes; Formal and Non-Formal Education System



  1. Al Jarrah, H. Y. (2019). Six thinking hats: An analysis of the skill level of Jordanian vocational education teachers and the extent of skill application. Space and Culture, India, 7(1), 170-185. doi: 10.20896/saci.v7i1.470 DOI:
  2. APEC Education Cooperation Strategies (2016). Institute of APEC Collaborative Education Ministry of Education. Republic of Korea. Retrieved from
  3. Claxton, G., Costa, A., & Kallick, B. (2016). Hard thinking about soft skills. Educational Leadership, 73(6), 60-64.
  4. Code of Good Practice in the Provision of Transnational Services (2002). Strasbourg. Retrieved from
  5. Devlet-Geldy, G.K. (2015). Social partnership of school and University. Humanities Bulletin, 6.
  6. Di Russo, S. (2016). Understanding the behaviour of design thinking in complex environments. Unpublished PhD thesis. Melbourne: Swinburne University.
  7. Freeman, D. (2015). The problem of the influence of the electronic environment on intellectual development and interpersonal relations of gifted and talented children. Psychological Science and Education, 20(1), 102-109. DOI:
  8. Galazhinsky, E. (2017). What is not taught at universities? Vedomosti. Retrieved from
  9. Gerstein, J. (2017). Moving from Education 1.0 through Education 2.0 Towards Education 3.0. Retrieved from
  10. International House Frankfurt acàdemia Suarez (2018). Retrieved from
  11. Jonas, D.L., Garland, M., & Yamaguchi, R. (2014). Following Virginia’s Career and Technical Education completers out of high school and into college. A study of high school graduates’ college enrollment, persistence, and completion (pp. 50). Retrieved from
  12. Joseph, D.L., & Newman, D.A. (2010). Emotional intelligence: An integrative meta-analysis and cascading model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1). DOI:
  13. Kamyshanchenko, E.N., & Stepanenko, S.N. (2014). Factors of innovative development of subjects of the international market of educational services in the system of higher education. Modern problems of science and education, 6.
  14. Kang, S., Day, J.D., & Meara, N. M. (2006). Soziale und emotionale Intelligenz: Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede (pp. 101-115). Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefee.
  15. Kasprzhak, A.G., & Kalashnikov, S. P. (2014). Priority of educational results as a tool of modernisation of teacher training programs. Psychological science and education, 19(3), 87-104.
  16. Khabiri, M. M., & Bahabad, M. J. A. (2019). Teaching and learning of practical skills: Learning from the pavement laboratory course. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 11(2). DOI:
  17. Maharoff, M., & Hassan, A. (2015). Lecturers’ understanding and teaching practices in embedding soft skills into compulsory courses. Proceedings of INTCESS15- 2nd International Conference on Education and Social Sciences. Turkey: Istanbul.
  18. Malik, A.B. (2010). Public–private partnerships in Education Lessons learned from the Punjab Education Foundation (pp. 29). Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.
  19. Mikhailova, E.S. (2007). Social intelligence: Concepts, models, diagnostics. SPb., SPbU. Retrieved from
  20. Pachauri, D., & Yadav, A. (2014). Importance of soft skills in teacher education Programme. Int. J. Educat. Res. Technol., 5(1), 22-25.
  21. Popova, I.N. (2016). Network interaction as a resource for the development of general and additional education. Internet-journal "The World of Science", 4(6).
  22. Rouse, M. (2008). Developing inclusive practice: A role for teachers and teacher education. Retrieved from
  23. Shurygin, V.Y., & Krasnova, L.A. (2017). The peculiarities of pedagogical projects implementation for identification and development of giftedness in children. Astra Salvensis, 1, 47-54.
  24. Shurygin, V.Y., & Sabirova, F.M. (2017). Implementation in teaching physics by means of LMS Moodle. Espacios, 38(40), 39.
  25. Thessin, R.A., Scully-Russ, E., & Lieberman, D.S. (2017). Critical success factors in a high school healthcare education program. Journal of Career and Technical Education, 32(1).
  26. Vincent-Lankran, S. (2010). Cross-border higher education: Trends and development prospects. Bulletin of International Organisations, 3(29).
  27. Zhukova, T., Bogoslovskiy, V., Dobudko, T., Sevenyuk, S., & Vershinina, L. (2019). Multicultural teaching in regions (within sustainability conception in education). Space and Culture, India, 7(1), 274-284. doi: 10.20896/saci.v7i1.437 DOI:


Download data is not yet available.