Vol. 7 No. 4 (2020)
Space and Culture, India

Perspective

The Use of Stable Expressions in Modern Economic Discourse as an Emotional Increase in the Potential Impact on Purchasing Power

Published 2020-03-29

  • Irina Karabulatova
    • ,
  • Margarita S. Vykhrystyuk
    • ,
  • Natalia G. Dolzhenko
    • ,
  • Elena I. Mychko
    • ,
  • Elena V. Potmenskaya

Irina Karabulatova
Department of Foreign Languages, Faculty of Philology, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, RUDN-university, Moscow, Russia

Margarita S. Vykhrystyuk
Federal State autonomous Educational Institution of higher professional Education “Tyumen State University”, Tyumen, Russia

Natalia G. Dolzhenko
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of higher education Yugra State University, Khanty-Mansiysk, Russian Federation

Elena I. Mychko
Doctor of Pedagogy, Professor of the Institute of Pedagogy, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kalilningrad, Russia

Elena V. Potmenskaya
PhD in Education, Associate professor of the Institute of Pedagogy, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, Russia

Abstract

This study is an attempt to analyse economic discourse metaphors and stable expressions. Significant attention is paid to metaphor creative potential in the field of terms formation as well as representation of certain aspects of economic reality events. Some rhetoric models are especially studied from the point of view of their rhetoric impact on the potential audience. The market of goods and services began to develop rapidly in the modern consumer society, and as a result, the corpus of language tools began to expand to attract the attention of potential recipients of goods and services. Economics and linguistics are two spheres of science that are united by humans – acting and thinking/ speaking. Modern consumer society requires members of society equipped with economic knowledge that facilitate the process of acquiring something. Today, advertising with economic terminology is becoming more diverse, and it can be targeted at professionals and the broadest segments of the population. Recently, not only linguistic but also paralinguistic levels of advertising discourse realisation have become more and more relevant. The authors consider the phenomenon of linguistic metaphors in economic advertising discourse. The complexity of understanding the material is due to the use of linguistic and cultural stereotypes of the local type. The authors propose to pay attention to the fact of using metaphors of a language culture to attract potential consumers of economic services and create an image of an attractive product of economic discourse in one of the primary mechanisms for managing economic interests in the consumer society. Hence, there is a need to study economic terminology and its functioning in modern economic discourse. This study considers the metaphors of economic discourse as a manifestation of his interdiscursive nature. We analyse the compatibility of economic metaphors with national and cultural symbols and possibilities to influence the audience.

Keywords

economic discourse, term creative potential, stable expressions, metaphoric character, evaluativity, rhetoric impact

pdf

References

  1. Anderson, R.D. Jr. (2002). Anderson, R.D. Jr. The casual power of metaphor in politics. Retrieved on 14 April 2019 from, http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/faculty /Anderson/MetaphorsCauses. html.
  2. Bakhtin, B.M. (1975). Questions of literature and aesthetics. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya Literatura, 504
  3. Gavrilova, J. (2014). Systemic-functional approach in Michael Halliday Linguistics. Bulletin of the Moscow State regional university. Series: Linguistics. 3, 16-21. Retrieved on 10 August 2019 from: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21715742.
  4. Financial Dictionary (2020). Retrieved on 4 January 2020 from, https://ru.mfginvest.com/zombie-bank.
  5. Karabulatova, I.S. (2013). The problems of linguistic modeling of new Eurasian linguistic personality in multilinguistic and mental environment (by example of onomasphere). Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 17(6), 791-795. DOI: 10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.17.06.12262.
  6. Karabulatova I., Vildanov Kh., Zinchenko A., Vasilishina E., Vassilenko A. (2017). Problems of transformation matrices modern multicultural identity of the person in the variability of the discourse of identity electronic Information Society. Pertanika. Journal of Social Science & Humanities. 25(S). 1-16. Retrieved on 21 January 2020 from, https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=31061201
  7. Kara-Murza, S.G. (2018). Manipulations with consciousness. Moscow: Publishing House “Rodina”, 432
  8. Klanshhakova, A.Ju. (2003). The metaphor in the structure of economic discourse: experience of complex investigation (based on English language): Thesis for the degree of Candidate of Philological Sciences, Irkutsk, Irkutsk State University,181.
  9. Khachmafova, Z. R., Karabulatova, I.S., Serebryakova, S.V., Zinkovskaya, A.V., Ermakova, E.N. (2017). The specifics of an estimate discourse of gender stereotypes in small forms of folklore in a network discourse of electronic and information society at the beginning of 21ct Century. Pertanika Journal of Social Science & Humanities, 25 (S), 137-150. Retrieved on 11 December 2019 from, https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=31063247/
  10. Koryakovtseva, O. A., Doronina, I. I., Panchenko, T. M., Karabulatova, I. S., Abdullina, Z. M. (2016). Research of category “motivation” as a basic tool of personnel management. International Review of Management and Marketing. 6 (1S), 293-299. Retrieved on 24 January 2020 from, http://econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/view/1918/pdf
  11. Kostruba, A. V. (2019). The rule of law and its impact on Socio-Economic, Environmental, Gender and Cultural Issues. Space and Culture, India, 7(2), 1-2. DOI:10.20896/saci.v7i2.522 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v7i2.522
  12. Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (2004). The metaphors we live by. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 35-42.
  13. Luchinskaya E.N., Karabulatova I.S., Zelenskaya V.V., Golubtsov S.A. (2018). Characteristics of image of the Russian family in modern advertising discourse. Astra Salvensis, 6 (11), 699 -714. Retrieved on 16 December 2019 from, https://astrasalva.files.wordpress.com/2018/04/as-supp-1.pdf
  14. Mahnickaja, E.Ju. (2003). Metaphor in modern economic discourse and principles of lexicographic description. Dissertation. Rostov-na-Donu.
  15. Minsky M.L. (2006). The emotion machine: Commonsense thinking, artificial intelligence, and the future of the human mind. Simon and Schuster. Moscow: Publishing House “AST”, 504.
  16. Musolff, A. (2006). Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 1(21), 23–38. Retrieved on 16 April 2019 from, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/30049898_Metaphor_Scenarios_in_Public_Discourse DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2
  17. Paris, R. (2004). Kosovo and the metaphor war. Political Science Quarterly, 117(3), 423–450. Retrieved on 15 April 2019 from, http://aix1.uottawa.ca/~rparis/Metaphor.pdf
  18. Riazi, A. (2003). The Invisible in translation: The role of text structure. Translation Journal, 7(2), Retrieved on 20 April 2019 from, https://www.translationjournal.net/journal/24structure.htm
  19. Ritchie, L.D. (2004). Common ground in metaphor theory: Continuing the conversation. Metaphor and Symbol, 19(3), 233–244.DOI: 10.1207/s15327868ms1903_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1903_4
  20. Rozhdestvenskij, Ju.V. (2003). Principles of modern rhetoric. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka. Retrieved on 26 January 2020 from, http://evartist.narod.ru/text7/36.htm
  21. Ryazantsev, S.V., Karabulatova, I.S., Mashin, R.V., Pismennaya, E.E., Sivoplyasova, S.Yu. (2015). Actual problems of human trafficking in Illegal immigration in the Russian Federation. Mediterranean Journal of Social Science, 6(3), 621-626. DOI:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n3s1. 621.
  22. Saenko, N.R., Sozinova, A.A., Karabulatova, I.S., Akhmetov, I.V., Mamatelashvili, O.V., Pismennaya, E.E. (2016). Research in action integrated marketing communications as the elements of information and virtualization market relations. International Review of management and marketing, 6(1S), 267-272. Retrieved on 25 January 2020 from, http://econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/view/1914/pdf
  23. Salter, L. (2003) Science and public discourse. History of intellectual culture, 3(1), 1-19. Retrieved on 16 January 2020 from, https://www.ucalgary.ca/hic/issues/vol3/2
  24. Sanders, T.J.M., Spooren, W. (2012). Discourse and text structure. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Ed. by D.Geeraerts and H.Cuyckens. Retrieved on 28 December 2019 from, https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738632.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199738632.
  25. Savchuk, I.P., Karabulatova I.S., Golubtsov S.A., Zelenskaya V.V., Akhmetova B. Z. (2019). Language features of the legend’s genre as the basis of storytelling technology in advertising discourse. Amazonia Investiga, 8(21), 522 - 530. Retrieved on 6 January 2020 from, https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/132
  26. Seth, S.P. (2015). Greece and the European Union. Retrieved on 21 January 2020 from, http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/opinion/25-Feb-2015/greece-and-the-european-union
  27. Schmitt, R., Schrὃder, J., Pfaller, L. (2018). Metaphern und metaphorische Konzepte – kognitive Linguistik nach Lakoff und Johnson. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-21460-9_1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21460-9_1
  28. Shiganova, G.A., Karabulatova, I.S., Sviridova, A.V., Yuzdova, L. P. (2018) The concept of “knowledge” / “cognition” in Russian paremia: The Experience of structural semantic representation. Astra Salvensis, 6(12), 385-393. Retrieved on 25 December 2018 from, https://astrasalva.files.wordpress.com/2018/10/astra-salvensis-vi-2018-no-123.pdf
  29. Taylor P. (2014). Germany keeps Its economic engine idling. Retrieved on 11 May 2018 from, http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/30/business/international/germany-keeps-its-economic-engine-idling.html?_r=1
  30. Temirgazina, Z., Akosheva, M., Yrysgul Sh., Shaharman A., Kurmanova Z., Kairova M. (2019). Metaphors in anatomical terminology. Space and Culture, India, 7(1), 143-153. DOI:10.20896/saci.v7i1.528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v7i1.528
  31. Vyhrystyuk M. S., Osipova, I. V., Karabulatova, I. S., Valentinovna, D. N., Druzhinina, O. M., Sabirova, S. G. (2017). Characteristics of gender stereotypes in modern advertising. Man in India, 97(23), 339-347. Retrieved on12 September 2018 from, https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35489394 Wynne B. (2001). Creating public alienation: Expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs. Science as Culture, 10(4), 445-481. Retrieved on 10 April 2017 from, https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/519561
  32. Zelenskaya V.V., Golubtsov S.A., Karabulatova I. S., Kanon I. A., Kasyanova Z. S. (2018). Innovative discourse in the formation of a modern ethno-cultural environment. Astra Salvensis, 6(12), 753-766. Retrieved on 25 December 2018 from, https://astrasalva.files.wordpress.com/2018/10/astra-salvensis-vi-2018-no-123.pdf

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.