Main Article Content
The article is devoted to the problem of constructing a unifying identity through the commonality of language as an alternative to the concepts and practices most widely spread in the modern world, which are understood as the construction of a single ethnic identity (including the concepts of ethnonation and ethnonationalism), as well as the construction of general civil identity and "civil" nation. The primary attention is paid to the methodology of ethnology and social sciences in general, as well as to the scientific grounds and methods of the construction of a unifying identity through language. The evolution of methods of social sciences, changes in paradigms in ethnology, some linguistic theories in the problematic area of interdisciplinary research relevant to the issues of linguistic identity are considered. The international legal aspects of an ethnos are also considered; the inseparable connection between the phenomena of ethnicity, an ethnos and collective rights of an individual, on the one hand, and the phenomenon of native language and collective rights as one of the formats of existence and exercising personal rights and freedoms is postulated. The conclusion is made about the possibility, advantages, and potential social stability of the construction of a unifying identity that harmonises ethnic relationships through language identity.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Bernays, E. (2012). Manipulyatsiya obshchestvennym mneniem: kak i pochemu [Manipulation of public opinion: How and why]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya, 4, 149-159.
Bernays, E. (2013). Inzheneriya soglasiya [Engineering of consent]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya, 4, 122-131.
Bromley, Yu.V. (1973). Etnos i etnografiya [Ethnos and ethnography] (p. 237). Moscow: Nauka.
Epshtein, M. (2004). Znak probela: O budushchem gumanitarnykh nauk [Space mark: On the future of the humanities]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.
Filin, F.P. (1966). Nekotorye voprosy razvitiya yazykov narodov SSSR [Some problems of the development of the languages of USSR peoples]. Vestnik AN SSSR, 11, 33.
Khrustalev, M.A. (2002). Politologiya i politicheskii analiz [Political science and political analysis]. In A.D. Bogaturov, N.A. Kosolapov, & M.A. Khrustalev, Ocherki teorii i politicheskogo analiza mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [Essays on the theory and political analysis of international relations] (p. 34). Moscow: Nauchno-obrazovatelnyi forum po mezhdunarodnym otnosheniyam.
Lakatos, I. (1995). Falsifikatsiya i metodologiya nauchno-issledovatelskikh programm [Falsification and methodology of research programs]. Moscow: Medium.
Lukov, A.V. (2006). Sledstviya "teoremy Tomasa" v usloviyakh stanovleniya informatsionnoi tsivilizatsii [Consequences of the "Thomas Theorem" in the conditions of information civilization]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, 4, 220 222.
Maiboroda, E.T., & Tsapko, M.I. (2008). Yazykovaya identichnost kak uslovie obespecheniya informatsionnoi bezopasnosti v sfere mezhetnicheskikh otnoshenii [Language identity as a condition for ensuring information security in the sphere of interethnic relations]. In Aktualnye problemy sotsiogumanitarnogo znaniya: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Topical problems of socio-humanitarian knowledge: Collection of scientific works] (Issue 17, pp. 127-130). Moscow: Vek knigi-3.
McLuhan, M., & Fiore, Q. (1967). The Medium is the Massage: An Inventory of Effects. New York: Random House.
Nye, J.S. (2013, 29 April ). What China and Russia Donâ€™t Get about Soft Power. Available at: http://foreignpolicy.com/2013/04/29/what-china-and-russia-dont-get-about-soft-power/ (accessed July 16, 2017)
Popper, K. (2013). Logik der Forschung. Berlin: Akademie Verlag GmbH.
Skvortsov, N.G. (1996). Problema etnichnosti v sotsialnoi antropologii [The Problem of ethnicity in social anthropology]. St. Petersburg.
Sokolovsky, S.V. (1997). Menshinstva v rossiiskikh regionakh: otechestvennaya etnografiya i politicheskaya praktika [Minorities in Russian regions: National ethnography and political practice]. In Etnometodologiya: problemy, podkhody, kontseptsii (sbornik statei) [Ethnomethodology: Problems, approaches, concepts (Collection ofarticles)] (Issue 4, pp. 82-100). Moscow: Put.
Tishkov, V.A. (1989). O novykh podkhodakh v teorii i praktike mezhnatsionalnykh otnoshenii [On new approaches in the theory and practice of interethnic relations]. Sovetskaya etnografiya, 5, 8.
Tishkov, V.A. (2017). Chto est natsiya: V poiskakh rossiiskoi identichnosti [What is a Nation: In search of Russian identity]. Nezavisimaya Gazeta, available at: http://www.ng.ru/stsenarii/2017-01-24/9_6910_nacia.html (accessed July 16, 2017).
Tsapko, M.I. (2017). Yazykovaya identichnost kak obedinyayushchaya identichnost: v poiske konstruiruyushchikh metodologicheskikh strategii [Language identity as unifying identity: In the search for constructing methodological strategies]. Language and culture in the era of integration of scientific knowledge and professionalization of education. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, Russia, Pyatigorsk, 16-17 March 2017.
Whorf, B. (1960). Otnoshenie norm povedeniya i myshleniya k yazyku [The Relation of standards of behavior and thinking to language]. In Novoe v lingvistike [New in linguistics] (Issue 1). Moscow.
Zarinov, I.Yu. (2000). Vremya iskat obshchii yazyk: Problema integratsii razlichnykh etnicheskikh teorii i kontseptsii [Time to Ñ‹earch for a Ñommon Ð´anguage: The problem of integration of various ethnic theories and concepts)]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, 2, 4.
Zorin, V.Yu. (2003). Ot natsionalnoi politiki k etnokulturnoi: Problemy stanovleniya doktriny i praktiki (1990-2002 gg.) [From national to ethno-cultural politics: The problems of the development of doctrine and practice (1990-2002)]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoi antropologii, 6(3), 123.
Zvegintsev, V.A. (1960). Teoretiko-lingvisticheskie predposylki gipotezy Sepira-Uorfa [Theoretical and linguistic prerequisites of Sapir-Whorf hypothesis]. In Novoe v lingvistike [New in linguistics] (Issue 1, pp. 111-134). Moscow.