Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Mothers Lived Experiences of Caesarean Section: A Qualitative Study among Mothers in Semi-Urban Areas of Bangladesh

Abstract

The commercialisation of health services has led to an increasing rate of unnecessary caesarean deliveries in developing countries like Bangladesh. This rising rate of unnecessary caesarean section (CS) is a serious concern, and it is associated with numerous short and long-term complications in both maternal and child health. This study aimed to explore the CS mother's direct experiences with the immediate and long-term physical effects of CS. Twenty-two participants were selected from the Naya Bazar area, Sylhet City Corporation, which included mothers, fathers, traditional birth attendants and community health care providers. A qualitative research approach was adopted, and in-depth interviews and key informant interviews were conducted to focus on the experiences of caesarean mothers. The interviews were conducted face-to-face and analysed thematically. Various short and long-term physical risks were found following CSs. Four important physical consequence themes emerged from the analysis: Medicinal and breastfeeding difficulties, pain and wound complexity, urinary incontinence, and experiences following a CS.  Some of the immediate consequences of the post-caesarean period impacted the mother’s ability to care for their child and the lack of mobility. Short and long-term consequences and physical pain impacted them over a long period. Unnecessary CSs can have short and long-term complications that need to be addressed. It is crucial to raise awareness about the potential consequences of CS for both the mother and the child, which would contribute to Sustainable Development Goals 3 (SDGs 3), ensuring well-being amongst the mother and the child.

Keywords

Caesarean Section, Caesarean Mothers, Consequences, Impacts, Complications, Experiences, Sustainable Development Goals 3 (SDGs 3), Semi-Urban Areas, ethnomedicine, qualitative exploration, indigenous khasi, Bangladesh

pdf

References

  1. Boerma, T., Ronsmans, C., Melesse, D. Y., Barros, A. J. D., Barros, F. C., Juan, L., Moller, A. B., Say, L., Hosseinpoor, A. R., Yi, M., de Lyra Rabello Neto, D., & Temmerman, M. (2018). Global Epidemiology of Use of and Disparities in Caesarean Sections. The Lancet. 392(10155), 1341–1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7
  2. Boatin, A. A., Ngonzi, J., Ganyaglo, G., Mbaye, M., Wylie, B. J., & Diouf, K. (2021). Caesarean Delivery in Low- and Middle-income Countries: A Review of Quality-of-care Metrics and Targets for Improvement. Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 26(1), 101199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2021.101199
  3. Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey. (2022). Bangladesh DHS 2022 - Key Indicators Report. The DHS Program. https://www.dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/PR148/PR148.pdf
  4. Betran, A. P., Torloni, M. R., Zhang, J. J., Gülmezoglu, A. M., & WHO Working Group on Caesarean Section (2016). WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 123(5), 667–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13526
  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic Analysis. APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol 2: Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological. American Psychological Association. 2(2), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004"
  6. Choudhary, D., Saxena, N., & Gupta, V. (2024). Trend Analysis of Caesarean Sections Using Modified Robson's Classification in a Teaching Institution in Uttarakhand. Journal of family Medicine and Primary Care. 13(6), 2278–2282. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1288_23
  7. Chien P. (2021). Global Rising Rates of Caesarean Sections. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 128(5), 781–782. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16666
  8. Carbonnel, M., Brot, D., Benedetti, C., Kennel, T., Murtada, R., Revaux, A., & Ayoubi, J. M. (2021). Risk Factors for Wound Complications After Caesarean Section. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction. 50(7), 101987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101987
  9. Conner, S. N., Verticchio, J. C., Tuuli, M. G., Odibo, A. O., Macones, G. A., & Cahill, A. G. (2014). Maternal Obesity and Risk of Postcaesarean Wound Complications. American Journal of Perinatology. 31(4), 299–304. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1348402
  10. Carlos, T., & Jorgelina, A. (2022). Increase in the Caesarean Rate: An Issue of Global Priority. International Journal of Family and Community Medicine. 6(5), 193-194. https://medcraveonline.com/IJFCM/IJFCM-06-00288.pdf
  11. Dhakal-Rai, S., van Teijlingen, E., Regmi, P. R., Wood, J., Dangal, G., & Dhakal, K. B. (2022). Factors Contributing to Rising Caesarean Section Rates in South Asian Countries: A Systematic Review. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences. 13(2), 143–174. https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v13i2.40904
  12. De Vries, B. S., Morton, R., Burton, A. E., Kumar, P., Hyett, J. A., Phipps, H., & McGeechan, K. (2022). Attributable Factors for the Rising Caesarean Delivery Rate Over 3 Decades: An Observational Cohort Study. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM. 4(2), 100555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100555
  13. Gundersen, T. D., Krebs, L., Loekkegaard, E. C. L., Rasmussen, S. C., Glavind, J., & Clausen, T. D. (2018). Postpartum Urinary Tract Infection by Mode of Delivery: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study. BMJ Open. 8(3), e018479. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018479
  14. Goldszmidt, E., Kern, R., Chaput, A., & Macarthur, A. (2005). The Incidence and Etiology of Postpartum Headaches: A Prospective Cohort Study. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. 52(9), 971–977. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03022061
  15. Grant, R., Condon, B., Hart, I., & Teasdale, G. M. (1991). Changes in Intracranial CSF Volume After Lumbar Puncture and their Relationship to Post-LP Headache. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 54(5), 440–442. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.54.5.440
  16. Hossain, M. A., Jahan, I., Haque, M. M., Sarwar, N., Yeasmin, N., & Islam, D. (2022). Rising Trends of Caesarean Section in Bangladesh: Associated Factors and Long-Term Complications on Health of Mother and Children. Journal of Maternal and Child Health. 7(5), 532–542. https://doi.org/10.26911/thejmch.2022.07.05.04
  17. Hobbs, A. J., Mannion, C. A., McDonald, S. W., Brockway, M., & Tough, S. C. (2016). The Impact of Caesarean Section on Breastfeeding Initiation, Duration and Difficulties in the First Four Months Postpartum. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 16, 90. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0876-1
  18. Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and Reliability in Quantitative Studies. Evidence-Based Nursing. 18(3), 66–67. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102129
  19. John, W., Moore., Séverine, Navarro., K., J., McCarthy., Ridwan, Bin, Rashid., Simon, Phipps., Akwasi, Amoako., L., Callaway., Victoria, Eley. (2024). State of the Art: Intrapartum Antibiotics in Caesarean Section—The Infant Microbiota and Allergic Diseases. Obstetric Anesthesia Digest. 7. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14577
  20. Kealy, M. A., Small, R. E., & Liamputtong, P. (2010). Recovery After Caesarean Birth: A Qualitative Study of Women's Accounts in Victoria, Australia. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 10(47). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-10-47
  21. Khan, M. N., Islam, M. M., Shariff, A. A., Alam, M. M., & Rahman, M. M. (2017). Socio-Demographic Predictors and Average Annual Rates of Caesarean Section in Bangladesh between 2004 and 2014. Plos One. 12(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177579
  22. Leth, R. A., Møller, J. K., Thomsen, R. W., Uldbjerg, N., & Nørgaard, M. (2009). Risk Of Selected Postpartum Infections After Caesarean Section Compared With Vaginal Birth: A Five-Year Cohort Study Of 32,468 Women. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 88(9), 976–983. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340903147405
  23. Li, L., & Cui, H. (2021). The Risk Factors and Care Measures of Surgical Site Infection After Caesarean Section in China: A Retrospective Analysis. BMC Surgery. 21(1), 248. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01154-x
  24. Mannion, C. A., Vinturache, A. E., McDonald, S. W., & Tough, S. C. (2015). The Influence of Back Pain and Urinary Incontinence on Daily Tasks of Mothers at 12 Months Postpartum. Plos One. 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129615
  25. Mueller, N. T., Whyatt, R., Hoepner, L., Oberfield, S., Dominguez-Bello, M. G., Widen, E. M., ... & Rundle, A. (2015). Prenatal Exposure to Antibiotics, Caesarean Section and Risk of Childhood Obesity. International Journal of Obesity. 39(4), 665-670. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2014.180
  26. Nagy, S., & Papp, Z. (2020). Global Approach of the Caesarean Section Rates. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 49(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2020-0463
  27. Noble, H., & Smith, J. (2015). Issues of Validity and Reliability in Qualitative Research. Evidence-Based Nursing. 18(2), 34–35. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102054
  28. Oths, K.S. (1999). Debilidad: A Biocultural Assessment of an Embodied Andean Illness. Medical Anthropology Quarterly. 13, 286-315. https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.1999.13.3.286
  29. Prado, D. S., Mendes, R. B., Gurgel, R. Q., Barreto, I. D. C., Cipolotti, R., & Gurgel, R. Q. (2018). The Influence of Mode of Delivery on Neonatal and Maternal Short and Long-Term Outcomes. Revista de Saude Publica, 52, 95. https://doi.org/10.11606/S1518-8787.2018052000742
  30. Sandall, J., Tribe, R. M., Avery, L., Mola, G., Visser, G. H., Homer, C. S., Gibbons, D., Kelly, N. M., Kennedy, H. P., Kidanto, H., Taylor, P., & Temmerman, M. (2018). Short-Term and Long-Term Effects of Caesarean Section on the Health of Women and Children. The Lancet, 392(10155), 1349–1357. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5
  31. Sichitiu, J., Baud, D., Vial, Y., & Desseauve, D. (2021). Ten Labor Ward Commandments: Reducing the Caesarean Section Rate by One-Third. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 34(8), 1318-1319. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1633302
  32. Scheper-Hughes, Nancy, & Margaret M. Lock (1987). The Mindful Body: A Prolegomenon to Future Work in Medical Anthropology. Medical Anthropology Quarterly. 1, 6–41. https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.1987.1.1.02a00020
  33. Temming, L. A., Raghuraman, N., Carter, E. B., Stout, M. J., Rampersad, R. M., Macones, G. A., Cahill, A. G., & Tuuli, M. G. (2017). Impact Of Evidence-Based Interventions on Wound Complications After Caesarean Delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 217(4), 449.e1–449.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.070
  34. UNICEF (2018). Capture the Moment: Early Initiation of Breastfeeding. https://data.unicef.org/resources/capture-the-moment/
  35. Weckesser, A., Farmer, N., Dam, R., Wilson, A., Morton, V. H., & Morris, R. K. (2019). Women's Perspectives on Caesarean Section Recovery, Infection and the PREPS Trial: A qualitative Pilot Study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 19(1), 245. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2402-8
  36. Weiser, T. G., Haynes, A. B., Molina, G., Lipsitz, S. R., Esquivel, M. M., Uribe-Leitz, T., Fu, R., Azad, T., Chao, T. E., Berry, W. R., & Gawande, A. A. (2015). Estimate of the Global Volume of Surgery in 2012: An Assessment Supporting Improved Health Outcomes. The Lancet. 385(2), S11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60806-6
  37. WHO (2021). Caesarean Section Rates Continue to Rise, Amid Growing Inequalities in Access. https://www.who.int/news/item/16-06-2021-caesarean-section-rates-continue-to-rise-amid-growing-inequalities-in-access
  38. Yang, X. J., & Sun, S. S. (2017). Comparison of Maternal and Fetal Complications in Elective and Emergency Caesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 296(3), 503–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4445-2
  39. Zbiri, S., Rozenberg, P., Goffinet, F., & Milcent, C. (2018). Caesarean Delivery Rate and Staffing Levels of the Maternity Unit. Plos One. 13(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207379

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.