Vol. 11 No. 4 (2024)
Journal Space and Culture, India recognises and appreciates the contribution of social workers worldwide

Research

Unlocking Trade Potential: A Stochastic Frontier Gravity Model Analysis of India-Africa Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Goods Trade

Published 2024-03-29

  • Uttam Karmakar
    • ,
  • Amiya Sarma

Uttam Karmakar
PhD Scholar, Department of Economics, Gauhati University, Guwahati 781014, India

Amiya Sarma
Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Gauhati University, Guwahati-781014, India Email:amiya@gauhati.ac.in

Abstract

This study examines the relatively unexplored domain of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) trade between India and the African Union (AU), applying the Stochastic Frontier Gravity Model (SFGM) to measure the untapped potential and discern factors that impede trade. It points out India’s burgeoning role in global ICT trade, with the AU being an increasingly valuable market due to its digital growth and young population. The research identifies India’s significant comparative advantage in exporting telecommunication equipment, with a Revealed Comparative Advantage of 3.54, strategically enhancing its position in the global marketplace. The research notes the high trade complementarity index of 0.984 in 2021, indicating a strong synergy between India’s export capabilities and the AU’s demand, suggesting a beneficial trade relationship. It acknowledges the shift in Africa’s ICT import partners, highlighting China’s rising influence and the need for India to solidify its market share in Africa strategically.

The SFGM’s application to evaluate trade efficiency, considering factors such as GDP, exchange rate, distance, tariff rate, and language, provides insightful conclusions. Positive impacts of GDP, exchange rate, and shared language on bilateral ICT trade are found to be significant. The findings emphasise the importance of strengthening trade ties for economic development and digital transformation in Africa.

Keywords

Information and Communication Technology (ICT), Stochastic Frontier Gravity Model, Trade Efficiency, India, Africa

pdf

References

  1. Aigner, D., Lovell, C. K., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5
  2. Armstrong, S. P. (2007). Measuring trade and trade potential: A survey. Crawford School Asia Pacific Economic Paper, (368). http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1760426 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1760426
  3. Atif, R. M., Haiyun, L., & Mahmood, H. (2017). Pakistan's agricultural exports, determinants and its potential: an application of stochastic frontier gravity model. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 26(3), 257-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2016.1243724 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2016.1243724
  4. Bach, D. C. (2013). Africa in international relations: The frontier as concept and metaphor. South African Journal of International Affairs, 20(1), 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2013.783283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2013.783283
  5. Baier, S.L., & J.H. Bergstrand. (2009). Bonus vetus OLS: A simple method for approximating international trade cost effects using the gravity equation. Journal of International Economics, 77(1), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.10.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.10.004
  6. Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalisation and "revealed" comparative advantage. The Manchester School, 33(2), 99-123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x
  7. Bankole, F. O., Brown, I., & Osei-Bryson, K. M. (2010). Does investments in ICT impact Trade in Africa? A trend analysis of trade flows in Africa. Annual Workshop of the AIS Special Interest Group for ICT in Global Development. http://aisel.aisnet.org/globdev2010
  8. Bergstrand, J. H. (1985). The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(3), 474–481. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1925976 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1925976
  9. Calandro, E., Gillwald, A., Moyo, M., & Stork, C. (2010). Comparative ICT sector performance review 2009/2010 (Towards evidence-based ICT policy and regulation). Research ICT Africa. https://researchictafrica.net/publication/comparative-ict-sector-performance-review-20092010/
  10. CEPII. (2022). International trade gravity dataset. http://www.cepii.fr/CEPII/en/cepii/cepii.asp
  11. Chan, S. (2020). China’s evolving role in regional production networks: evidence from the ICT industry. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 37(1), 78–92. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26938862 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1355/ae37-1e
  12. Chivunga, M., & Tempest, A. (2021). Digital disruption in Africa: Mapping innovations for the AfCFTA in post-COVID times. South African Institute of International Affairs. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep28288
  13. Devadason, E. S., & Chandran, V. G. R. (2019). Unlocking the trade potential in China-ASEAN relations: The China-Vietnam context. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 36(3), 380–399. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26842381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1355/ae36-3f
  14. Drysdale, P., Huang, Y., & Kalirajan, K. (2000). China’s trade efficiency: Measurement and determinants. In P. Drysdale, Y. Zhang & L. Song (Eds.). APEC and Liberalization of the Chinese economy. Canberra: Asia Pacific Press (pp. 259–271).
  15. Gakhar, S., and Gokarn, S., (2015). India-Africa Trade And Investment: A Backdrop. Brookings.
  16. Githaiga, N. M. (2021). Kenya-China trade in manufactured goods: A competitive or complementary relationship?. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 9(3), 96-117. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2021.93007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2021.93007
  17. Hassan, M. T. (2017). An analysis of prime determinants and constraints of Bangladesh’s export market: Stochastic frontier gravity model approach. World Customs Journal, 11(2), 77-92. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/An-analysis-of-prime-determinants-and-constraints-Hassan/74d162fed61a01c13788ea36351f271925cf11a3
  18. ICEA (2018). Making India the global manufacturing powerhouse for mobile handsets and components. India Cellular and Electronics Association.
  19. International Monetary Fund. (2024). GDP, current prices. https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/NGDPD@WEO/OEMDC/ADVEC/WEOWORLD
  20. Kalirajan, K. (2007). Regional cooperation and bilateral trade flows: An empirical measurement of resistance, The International Trade Journal, 21(2), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853900701266555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08853900701266555
  21. Kalirajan, K., & Findlay, C. (2005). Estimating potential trade using gravity models: A suggested methodology. Foundation for Advanced Studies on International Development, Tokyo.
  22. Lunogelo, H. B., & Baregu, S. (2013). Indo-Africa relationship: Opportunities for technology transfer between India and African countries. Economic and Social Research Foundation (ESRF).
  23. Manuwa, T. (2023). The digital transformation of diplomacy: Implications for the African Union. East African Scholars Journal of Education, Humanities and Literature, 6(8), 365-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.36349/easjehl.2023.v06i08.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36349/easjehl.2023.v06i08.002
  24. Meeusen, W., & van Den Broeck, J. (1977). Technical efficiency and dimension of the firm: Some results on the use of frontier production functions. Empirical Economics, 2, 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01767476 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01767476
  25. Mikic, M., & Gilbert, J. (2007). Trade Statistics in Policymaking: A Handbook of Commonly Used Trade Indices And Indicators. United Nations.
  26. Mishra, A. (2018). The African Continental Free Trade Area and its Implications for India-Africa Trade. Washington International Trade Association.
  27. Montague-Mfuni, M., Fabian, F., & Scheepers, C. B. (2023). Advancing technological hub collaborations to promote transnational African communities. Technological Leapfrogging and Innovation in Africa: Digital Transformation and Opportunity for the Next Growth Continent, 71-88. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800370395.00012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800370395.00012
  28. Nguyen, S. T., & Wu, Y. (2020). Governance and export performance in Vietnam. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 37(1), 1–25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26938858 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1355/ae37-1a
  29. Olper, A., & Raimondi, V. (2008). Explaining national border effects in the QUAD food trade. Journal of Agricultural Economics 59 (3): 436–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2008.00155.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2008.00155.x
  30. Rajan, K. S. S. (1966). Tariff preferences and developing countries, Finance & Development, 0003(004). https://doi.org/10.5089/9781616352844.022.A004
  31. Sevela, M. (2002). Gravity-type model of czech agricultural export. Agricultural Economics 48(10) 463– 466. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/5353-AGRICECON DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/5353-AGRICECON
  32. Thahara, A. F., Rinosha, K. F., & Shifaniya, A. J. F. (2021). The relationship between exchange rate and trade balance: Empirical evidence from Sri Lanka. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business. 8(5), 0037–0041. http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no5.0037
  33. The World Bank, World Development Indicators. (2022). Population ages 0-14 (% of total population) [Data file]. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.0014.TO.ZS
  34. Tsikata, D., Fenny, A. P., & Aryeetey, E. (2008). China-Africa relations: A case study of Ghana. AERC Scoping Studies on China-Africa Economic Relations.
  35. UNCTAD. (2016). Handbook on the Special and Preferential Tariff Scheme of China for Least Developed Countries. United Nations. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/itcdtsbmisc76_en.pdf
  36. UNCTAD. (2017). Handbook on India’s Duty-Free Tariff Preference Scheme for Least Developed Countries. United Nations. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/itcdtsbmisc77_en.pdf
  37. UNCTAD. (2018). Updating the Partnership Definition of ICT Goods from HS 2012 to HS 2017. United Nations. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/tn_unctad_ict4d02_en.pdf
  38. UNCTADSTAT. (2023). Bilateral Trade Flows by ICT Goods Categories, Annual [Data file]. https://unctadstat.unctad.org/datacentre/dataviewer/US.IctGoodsValue