Vol. 12 No. 02 (2024)
Journal Space and Culture, India

Perspective

Eco-Consciousness and Eco-Semiotics in Amruta Patil’s Kari: An Exploration of Queer Ecology

Published 2024-09-27

  • Jensi Helan J
    • ,
  • Rashmi Borah

Jensi Helan J
Research Scholar, School of Social Sciences and Languages, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vandalur-Kelambakkam Road,Chennai-600 127, Tamil Nadu, India

Rashmi Borah
Assistant Professor (Senior), School of Social Sciences and Languages, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vandalur-Kelambakkam Road,Chennai-600 127, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract

The field of ecology in literature distorted the notion of humans being the centre of all living ecosystems, striving for an “environment that is neither solipsistically anthropocentric nor blatantly anti-humanitarian” (Lauer, 2018, p.13). This led to the emergence of ecocriticism, which dealt with environmental issues through literature. “To put it succinctly, eco criticism is the study of the relationship between literature and the physical environment… [As it] takes an earth-centred approach to literary studies” (Glotfelty & Fromm, 1996, p.18). Meanwhile, disregarding the societal norms constructed on sex, gender, and identity emerged queer theory, suggesting the fluidity of the human body. Despite their inherent differences, environmental criticism and queer theory have the opportunity to combine to produce a new dimension called queer ecology. This analysis aims to establish a connection between eco-criticism and queer theory, shedding light on the concept of queer ecology through the analysis of the literary text Kari.

Kari, written by the first female graphic novelist, stands as a pioneering Indian lesbian graphic novel that effectively dismantles prevailing societal norms and challenges perspectives on genderqueer individuals. Further, the analysis narrows itself to an eco-conscious approach from a queer perspective, which claims to be the main argument of the article. In its graphical representation, this analysis also focuses on the meaning nature provides us through symbols defining eco-semiotics. The purpose of the study is to contribute to a greater understanding of environmental exploitation concerning the marginalisation experienced by the queer community. The eco-conscious attitude that is looked upon from a queer perspective serves to prove the mutual interdependence between eco-critical and queer sexual desires that are often negated, ignored, exploited and marginalised amidst the dominant ideological discourses.

Keywords

Graphic Novel, Ecocriticism, Queer Theory, Queer Ecology, Eco-Consciousness and Eco-Semiotics

pdf

References

  1. Amer, E. (2022). Literature and Ecology: Promoting an Eco-Consciousness through Children Literature. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 4(3), 192-201. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v4i3.993 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v4i3.993
  2. Bannnan-Watts, M.E., (2001). Spiritual Ecological Consciousness towards Ecological Conversion: Experiential Stories of Senior Secondary Students and An Autoethnography of the Researcher. Australian Catholic University.
  3. Barman, M. (2022). Arne Naess Reflection of Eco-Centrism and Deep- Ecology with Utilitarian and Deontological Defence against Anthropocentric Theory. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(3), 8736–8739. https://www.journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/5186/3390
  4. Buell, L., Heise, U. K., & Thornber, K. (2011). Literature and Environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36(1), 417-440. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-111109-144855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-111109-144855
  5. Charon. (2021). Greek Gods and Goddesses. https://greekgodsandgoddesses.net/gods/charon
  6. Datta, S. (2020). ‘Can You See Her the Way I Do?’: (Feminist) Ways of Seeing in Amruta Patil’s Kari (2008). Feminist Encounters: A Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 4(1), Article13, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/7917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/7917
  7. Farina, A., & Napoletano, B. (2010). Rethinking the Landscape: New Theoretical Perspectives for a Powerful Agency. Biosemiotics, 3(2), 177-187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-010-9086-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-010-9086-9
  8. Ffitch, M. (2020). Stay and Fight: A Novel. Picador.
  9. Gaard, G. (1997). Toward a Queer Ecofeminism. Hypatia, 12(1), 114-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1997.tb00174.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1997.tb00174.x
  10. Garrard, G. (2011). Ecocriticism. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203806838
  11. Glotfelty, C., & Fromm, H. (1996). The Ecocriticism Reader : Landmarks in Literary Ecology. University of Georgia Press. https://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA27557683
  12. Headley, M. D. (2018). The Mere Wife. Scribe Publications.
  13. Heckert, J. (2012). Queer Ecology: A Roundtable Discussion with Jill E. Anderson, Robert Azzarello, Gavin Brown, Katie Hogan, Gordon Brent Ingram, Michael J. Morris and Joshua Stephens. European Journal of Ecopsychology, 3, 82-103. https://ecopsychology-journal.eu/v3/EJE%20v3_Anderson%20et%20al.pdf
  14. Jackson, S. (2006). Interchanges: Gender, Sexuality and Heterosexuality. Feminist Theory, 7(1), 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700106061462 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700106061462
  15. Jee, A. M., & Mishra, S. (2022). Kari–The Review of Art References and the Meanings of Colors. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(4), 81-99. https://spe-jpsp.com/wp-content/uploads/2022-4-06.pdf
  16. Kerridge, R. (2006). Environmentalism and Ecocriticism. Literary Theory and Criticism, 530-543. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199291335.003.0036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199291335.003.0036
  17. Lauer, S. (2018). Disarming “Nature” as a Weapon: A Queer Ecosemiotic Reimagining of Futurity and Environmental Ethics through Memoir. Bucknell University.
  18. Mahurkar, V. (2017). Kari: A Graphic Novel about Lesbianism and Big-City Love. Feminism in India. https://feminisminindia.com/2017/03/28/kari-book-review/#:~:text=Kari%20is%20a%20graphic%20novel
  19. Maniar, R., Khan, H. K., Raghav, P., & Kaushik, V. (2021). Eco-crisis Leads to the Rise of Eco-consciousness. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 25(4), 9601-9606. http://annalsofrscb.ro/index.php/journal/article/view/3702
  20. Maran, T., & Kull, K. (2014). Ecosemiotics: Main Principles and Current Development. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 96(1), 41– 50. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43299746 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/geob.12035
  21. Morita, K. (2014). Ecocriticism and Gender/Sexuality Studies: A Book Review Article on New Work by Azzarello and Gaard, Estok, and Oppermann. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.2578 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.2578
  22. Morton, T. (2010). Guest Column: Queer Ecology. Publications of the Modern Language Association, 125(2), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2010.125.2.273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2010.125.2.273
  23. Narendiran, S. & Bhuvaneswari, R. (2021). Consciously Eco-conscious: An Eco-conscious Re-reading of Bibhutibhushan Bandyopadhyay’s Moon Mountain as Young Adult Literature. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 13(2). https://dx.doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v13n2.25 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v13n2.25
  24. Nayar, P. K. (2016). The Indian Graphic Novel: Nation, History and Critique. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315659435
  25. Nöth, W. (1998). Ecosemiotics. Σημειωτκή-Sign Systems Studies, 26(1), 332-343. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.1998.26.14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.1998.26.14
  26. Patil, A. (2008). Kari. HarperCollins.
  27. Raju, S. (2021). A Butlerian Reading of Kari by Amruta Patil. Research Journal of English Language and Literature (RJELAL), 9(3), 88-94, http://rjelal.com/9.3.21/88-94%20SURYA%20RAJU.pdf
  28. Sandilands, C. (2016). 52. Queer Ecology. In J. Adamson, W. Gleason & D. Pellow (Ed.), Keywords for Environmental Studies (pp. 169-171). New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814760741.003.0057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9780814760741.003.0057
  29. Saputri, D. A. (2018). Ecological Consciousness in J. C. George’s The Talking Earth: An Ecocritical Study. Sastra Inggris - Quill, 7(1), 31–45.http://journal.student.uny.ac.id/ojs/ojs/index.php/quill/article/download/14448/14025
  30. Schnabel, L. (2014). The Question of Subjectivity in Three Emerging Feminist Science Studies Frameworks: Feminist Postcolonial Science Studies, New Feminist Materialisms, and Queer Ecologies. Women’s Studies International Forum, 44, 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2014.02.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2014.02.011
  31. Sedgwick, E. K. (1990). Epistemology of the Closet. University of California Press.
  32. Sedgwick, E. K. (1993). Tendencies. Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11hpmxs
  33. Sessions, G. (1995). Deep Ecology for the Twenty-first Century: Readings on the Philosophy and Practice of the New Environmentalism. Shambhala Publications.
  34. Shiva, V., & Mies, M. (1993). Ecofeminism. Zed Books.
  35. Vuong, O. (2019). On Earth We're Briefly Gorgeous: ‘A Masterpiece’ – Max Porter. Random House.
  36. Watson, K. (2005). Queer Theory. Group Analysis, 38(1), 67-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0533316405049369 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0533316405049369
  37. Whitehead, J. (2018). Jonny Appleseed. Arsenal Pulp Press.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.