Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 12 No. 1 (2024)
Journal Space and Culture, India

Research

Indian Women in Doctoral Education: Some Encouraging Signs, the Path Ahead, and Lessons for Inclusivity

https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v12i1.1433

Published 2024-06-22

  • Satish Warpade
    • ,
  • Atul Kumar
    • ,
  • Arun Ingle
    • ,
  • Vishwas Pendse
    • ,
  • Jaiprakash Paliwal
    • ,
  • Mahesh Singh
    • ,
  • Rajesh Gade
    • ,
  • Vinodkumar Pathade
    • ,
  • Shirish Raibagkar

Satish Warpade
Director, Lotus Business School, Pune, India

Atul Kumar
Professor, Dr. D. Y. Patil B-School, Pune, India

Arun Ingle
Director, DKKKP's-Maharashtra Institute of Management, Kalamb-Walchandnager,Pune, India

Vishwas Pendse
Assistant Professor, Sanjay Ghodawat University, Kolhapur, India

Jaiprakash Paliwal
Professor, Symbiosis Center for Skill Development and Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Nagpur, India

Mahesh Singh
Professor, Doon Business School, Dehradun, India

Rajesh Gade
Assistant Professor, Lotus Business School, Pune, India

Vinodkumar Pathade
Assistant Professor, Abhinav Education Society's Institute of Management and Business Administration, Akole, District. Ahmednagar, India

Shirish Raibagkar
Fellow Member, The Institute of Cost Accountants of India

Abstract

For the total doctorate awarded in India in 2013, the male-to-female ratio was 63:37. This ratio improved to 57:43 in favour of women in 2021. In absolute terms, the number of women awarded doctorates almost doubled in 2021 compared with 2013. In this study, we examine the progress made by Indian women in doctoral education based on annual reports from the All India Survey on Higher Education. The improved ratios and numbers reflect the adoption of an action-oriented approach in dealing with the concepts of equality and inclusion. The reasons for the progress and ways to improve were investigated based on secondary data and interviews with 15 expert senior female research supervisors. The interviews reveal that apart from the mandatory requirement of a PhD qualification for academic progression, other initiatives have been taken by the Government that have encouraged more women to opt for doctoral education. However, more needs to be done to make research easy for women in India, and such areas, as pointed out by the panel of experts, have been discussed. These findings can be used by other nations that want to bring more inclusivity to doctoral education.

Keywords

Doctoral Education, Women Researchers, Equality, Inclusivity, Research Scholars, Policy Goals, India

pdf

References

  1. Aksnes, D. W., Rorstad, K., Piro, F., & Sivertsen, G. (2011). Are female researchers less cited? A large‐scale study of Norwegian scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(4), 628-636. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21486 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21486
  2. All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE). (2010). Pay scales, service conditions and qualifications for the teachers and other academic staff in technical institutions (degree) Regulations 2010. https://www.aicte-india.org/downloads/reg-paydegree220110.pdf
  3. All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE). (2013-2021). Annual Reports from 2013 to 20219-22. https://aishe.gov.in/aishe/home
  4. Alrashidi, K. M. A. (2017). State of women in academia: Extent of supportive environment for female researchers. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 7(1), 13. http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2017.v7n1p13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2017.v7n1p13
  5. Amorosi, L., Cavagnini, R., Sasso, V. D., Fischetti, M., Morandi, V., & Raffaele, A. (2021, March). Women Just Wanna Have OR: Young Researchers Interview Expert Researchers. In Operations Research Forum 2(1), pp. 1-14. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43069-020-00039-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43069-020-00039-8
  6. Bagenstos, N. T. (1988). Preparing minorities and women as Researchers: Have we learned anything?. ERIC. ED294469. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED294469
  7. Begeny, C. T., Ryan, M. K., Moss-Racusin, C. A., & Ravetz, G. (2020). In some professions, women have become well represented, yet gender bias persists—Perpetuated by those who think it is not happening. Science Advances, 6(26), eaba7814. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba7814 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba7814
  8. Bell, E. L. E., Meyerson, D., Nkomo, S., & Scully, M. (2003). Interpreting silence and voice in the workplace: A conversation about tempered radicalism among Black and White women researchers. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(4), 381-414. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0021886303260502 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886303260502
  9. Bettachy, A., Maaroufi, F., Nouira, A., & Baitoul, M. (2009, April). Women scientific researchers in Morocco. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1119, No. 1, pp. 141-142). American Institute of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3137743 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3137743
  10. Blair‐Loy, M., & Cech, E. A. (2017, March). Demands and devotion: Cultural meanings of work and overload among women researchers and professionals in science and technology industries. Sociological Forum 32(No. 1), pp. 5-27).https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12315 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12315
  11. Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2011). How do men and women differ in research collaborations? An analysis of the collaborative motives and strategies of doctoral educationers. Research Policy, 40(10), 1393-1402.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.002
  12. Burner, T., Nodeland, T. S., & Aamaas, Å. (2018). Critical perspectives on perceptions and practices of diversity in education. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 2(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.2188 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.2188
  13. Campbell, T. D. (1974). Equality of opportunity. In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Vol. 75, pp. 51-68). Aristotelian Society, Wiley. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4544865 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/75.1.51
  14. Carter, I. (2011). Respect and the basis of equality. Ethics, 121(3), 538-571. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/epdf/10.1086/658897 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/658897
  15. Casad, B. J., Franks, J. E., Garasky, C. E., Kittleman, M. M., Roesler, A. C., Hall, D. Y., & Petzel, Z. W. (2021). Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 99(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24631 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24631
  16. Celis, S., & Véliz, D. (2020). A decade of Chilean graduate program accreditation: A push for internationalization and issues of multidisciplinarity. Higher Education Policy, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00198-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-020-00198-7
  17. Charvet, J. (1969). The idea of equality as a substantive principle of society. Political Studies, 17(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9248.1969.tb00621.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1969.tb00621.x
  18. Cidlinska, K. (2019). How not to scare off women: different needs of female early-stage researchers in STEM and SSH fields and the implications for support measures. Higher Education, 78(2), 365-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0347-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0347-x
  19. Cui, R., Ding, H., & Zhu, F. (2022). Gender inequality in research productivity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 24(2), 707-726. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.0991 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.0991
  20. Davis, J. E. (1994). College in Black and White: Campus environment and academic achievement of African American males. The Journal of Negro Education, 63(4), 620-633. https://doi.org/10.2307/2967299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2967299
  21. Davis, S. M., Ashun, F., Dannett, A., Edwards, K., & Nwaohuocha, V. (2021). Writing ourselves into existence: Black women researchers’ collaborative autoethnographic reflections on addressing exclusion in academia. Departures in Critical Qualitative Research, 10(1), 4-27. https://doi.org/10.1525/dcqr.2021.10.1.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/dcqr.2021.10.1.4
  22. De Hoyos, M. and Barnes, S., (2012). Analysing interview data. Warwick Institute for Employment Research. 37 slides.
  23. Devarakonda, C., and Powlay, L. (2016). Diversity and Inclusion. In A Guide to Early Years and Primary Teaching, edited by D Wyse and S Rogers, 185–204. London: Sage.
  24. Dworkin, S.L. (2012). Sample size policy for qualitative studies using in-depth interviews. Archives of Sexual Behavior 41, 1319–1320. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-012-0016-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-0016-6
  25. Eklund, K., Berggren, H., Trägårdh, L., Persson, K., & Hedvall, B. (2012). The Nordic Way-Equality, Individuality and Social Trust. Stockholm: The Swedish Institute.
  26. Espinoza, Ó. and Eduardo González, L. (2013). Accreditation in higher education in Chile: results and consequences, Quality Assurance in Education, 21 (1), pp. 20- 38. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881311293043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881311293043
  27. Frankel, C. (1971). Equality of opportunity. Ethics, 81(3), 191-211. https://doi.org/10.1086/291810 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/291810
  28. Ganesan, S. (2022, 07 June). 1st woman to get PhD in biochem battled food adulteration, gender bias. Times of India. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/1st-woman-to-get-phd-in-biochem-battled-food-adulteration-gender-bias/articleshow/92046859.cms.
  29. Garcia-Gonzalez J, Forcén P, Jimenez-Sanchez M. (2019). Men and women differ in their perception of gender bias in research institutions. PLoS ONE 14(12), e0225763. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225763 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225763
  30. Gran, B. K. (2017). An international framework of children's rights. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 13 (1): 79–100. doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-084638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-084638
  31. Gupta, N. (2007). Indian women in doctoral education in science and engineering: A study of informal milieu at the reputed Indian institutes of technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 32(5), 507-533. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904805303200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904805303200
  32. Hartley, N., & Dobele, A. (2009). Feathers in the nest: Establishing a supportive environment for women researchers. The Australian Educational Researcher, 36(1), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216891 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216891
  33. Hillman, N., & Robinson, N. (2016). Boys to Men: The underachievement of young men in higher education-and how to start tackling it. Oxford: Higher Education Policy Institute.
  34. Holdcroft, A. (2007). Gender bias in research: how does it affect evidence based medicine? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 100(1), 2-3. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F014107680710000102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.100.1.2
  35. Holley, L. C., Risley-Curtiss, C., Stott, T., Jackson, D. R., & Nelson, R. (2007). “It’s Not Scary” Empowering women students to become researchers. Affilia, 22(1), 99-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109906295812 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109906295812
  36. Hosseini, M., & Sharifzad, S. (2021). Gender disparity in publication records: a qualitative study of women researchers in computing and engineering. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 6(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-021-00117-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-021-00117-3
  37. Ioannidou, E., Letra, A., Shaddox, L. M., Teles, F., Ajiboye, S., Ryan, M., ... and D’Souza, R. N. (2019). Empowering women researchers in the new century: IADR’s strategic direction. Advances in Dental Research, 30(3), 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022034519877385 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034519877385
  38. Ion, G., & Duran Belloch, M. D. M. (2013). Successful women researchers in the Social Sciences: A case study of Catalan public universities. Tertiary Education and Management, 19(1), 68-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2012.746729 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2012.746729
  39. Ives, G., & Rowley, G. (2005). Supervisor selection or allocation and continuity of supervision: Ph. D. students’ progress and outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 30(5), 535-555. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500249161 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500249161
  40. Kameny, R. R., DeRosier, M. E., Taylor, L. C., McMillen, J. S., Knowles, M. M., & Pifer, K. (2014). Barriers to career success for minority researchers in the behavioral sciences. Journal of Career Development, 41(1), 43-61. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0894845312472254 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845312472254
  41. Khandoker, R. R., Khondaker, S., Nur, F. N., & Sultana, S. (2019, December). LIFECRAFT: An android based application system for women safety. In 2019 International Conference on Sustainable Technologies for Industry 4.0 (STI) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/STI47673.2019.9068024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/STI47673.2019.9068024
  42. Leathwood, C. (2017). Women doctoral educationers: Still interlopers in the UK academy?. In The changing role of women in higher education (pp. 227-242). Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42436-1_12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42436-1_12
  43. Lewin, T. (2006, 9 July). At colleges, women are leaving men in the dust. The New York Times, https://www.hunter.cuny.edu/fysh/Course%20Readings/At%20Colleges%2c%20Women%20are%20Leaving%20Men%20in%20the%20Dust.pdf.
  44. Lhotska, L., & Stepankova, O. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Women Researchers in the Czech Republic. Applied Sciences, 12(3), 1465. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031465 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031465
  45. Loreman, T., Deppeler, J., & Harvey, D. (2005). Inclusive education: A practical guide to supporting diversity in the classroom. New York. Psychology Press.
  46. Lu, Y., Nakicenovic, N., Visbeck, M. et al. (2015). Policy: Five priorities for the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Nature 520, 432–433. https://doi.org/10.1038/520432a DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/520432a
  47. Lundahl, L. (2016). Equality, Inclusion and Marketization of Nordic Education: Introductory Notes. Research in Comparative and International Education 11 (1): 3–12. doi:10.1177/1745499916631059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499916631059
  48. Mandapati, S., Pamidi, S., & Ambati, S. (2015). A mobile based women safety application (I Safe Apps). IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering (IOSR-JCE), 17(1), 29-34. https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jce/papers/Vol17-issue1/Version-1/F017112934.pdf
  49. McAnelly, K., and M. Gaffney. (2019). Rights, Inclusion and Citizenship: a Good News Story About Learning in the Early Years. International Journal of Inclusive Education 23 (10): 1081–1094. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2019.1629123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1629123
  50. McComas, K.L. (2010). Tools and Community: How Women Become Researchers in Communication Sciences and Disorders. Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. 102. https://mds.marshall.edu/etd/102
  51. Nutbrown, C., and P. Clough. (2009). Citizenship and Inclusion in the Early Years: Understanding and Responding to Children’s Perspectives on ‘Belonging’. International Journal of Early Years Education 17 (3): 191–206. doi: 10.1080/09669760903424523 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760903424523
  52. OECD. (2019). Education at a Glance 2019. https://doi.org/10.1787/f8d7880d-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/f8d7880d-en
  53. Pace, F., & Sciotto, G. (2021). Gender Differences in the Relationship between Work–Life Balance, Career Opportunities and General Health Perception. Sustainability, 14(1), 357. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010357
  54. Reddy, P. B. P., Reddy, M. P. K., Reddy, G. V. M., & Mehata, K. M. (2019, March). “Fake data analysis and detection using ensembled hybrid algorithm.” In 2019 3rd International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC) (pp. 890-897). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCMC.2019.8819741 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCMC.2019.8819741
  55. Reynolds, A.C., O’Mullan, C., Pabel, A., Martin-Sardesai, A., Alley, S., Richardson, S., Colley, L., Bousie, J. and McCalman, J. (2018). Perceptions of success of women early career researchers. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 9(1), pp. 2-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-D-17-00019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-D-17-00019
  56. Richards, J. R. (2018). Equality of Opportunity. The Notion of Equality (pp. 321-347). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315199795-13
  57. Rong, X. L., Grant, L., & Ward, K. B. (1989). Productivity of women scholars and gender researchers: Is funding a factor?. The American Sociologist, 20(1), 95-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02697790 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02697790
  58. Roth, H., LeMarquand, G., Henry, A., & Homer, C. (2019). Assessing knowledge gaps of women and healthcare providers concerning cardiovascular risk after hypertensive disorders of pregnancy—a scoping review. Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 6, 178. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2019.00178 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2019.00178
  59. Sathyasri, B., Vidhya, U. J., Sree, G. J., Pratheeba, T., & Ragapriya, K. (2019). Design and implementation of women safety system based on Iot technology. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 7(6S3). 177-181.Insert DOI https://ieeeprojectsmadurai.com/IEEE%202019%20IOT%20BASEPAPERS/2_WOMEN%20SAFETY.pdf
  60. Smith, C., & Watchorn, D. (2020). The pandemic is making it harder for researchers but women are hit the hardest. 4 findings from 80 countries. Impact of social sciences blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/
  61. Soderstrom, M. (2001). Why researchers excluded women from their trial populations. Lakartidningen 98 (13), 1524-1528.
  62. Solli, K.-A. (2010). Kunnskapsstatus som metodisk tilnærming i forskning om inkludering av barn med nedsatt funksjonsevne i barnehagen-refleksjon om oppsummering av kunnskap.
  63. The Hindu. (2019). UGC to review quality of PhD theses over 10 years. The Hindu. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/ugc-to-review-quality-of-phd-theses-over-10-years/article27277915.ece.
  64. The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act. (2013). https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/2104?sam_handle=123456789/1362#:~:text=An%20Act%20to%20provide%20protection,connected%20therewith%20or%20incidental%20thereto.&text=Notification%3A,%2C%202013%2C%20vide%20notification%20No.
  65. Thun, C. (2020). Excellent and gender equal? Academic motherhood and ‘gender blindness' in Norwegian academia. Gender, Work & Organization, 27(2), 166-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12368
  66. University Grants Commission. (2010). UGC Regulations on Minimum Qualifications. https://www.ugc.ac.in/oldpdf/regulations/revised_finalugcregulationfinal10.pdf
  67. University Grants Commission. (2016). University Grants Commission (Minimum Standards and Procedure for Award of M.PHIL./PH.D Degrees) Regulations, 2016. www.ugc.ac.in/pdfnews/4952604_UGC-(M.PHIL.-PH.D-DEGREES)-REGULATIONS,-2016.pdf
  68. University Grants Commission (2018). UGC Regulations on Minimum Qualifications. www.ugc.ac.in/pdfnews/4033931_UGC-Regulation_min_Qualification_Jul2018.pdf
  69. Vasumathi, A. (2018). Work life balance of women employees: A literature review. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 29(1), 100-146. https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJSOM.2018.088477 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSOM.2018.088477
  70. Venkatagiri, C. (2018, 9 February). Doing PhD in India: Think Thrice! Moneylife. https://www.moneylife.in/article/doing-phd-in-india-think-thrice/52923.html
  71. Wager, M. (1998). Women or researchers? The identities of academic women. Feminism & Psychology, 8(2), 236-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/095935359800800211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/095935359800800211
  72. Weinstein, N., Chubb, J. A., Haddock, G., & Wilsdon, J. R. (2021). A conducive environment? The role of need support in the higher education workplace and its effect on academics' experiences of research assessment in the UK. Higher Education Quarterly, 75(1), 146-160. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12259 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12259
  73. Westen, P. (1985). The concept of equal opportunity. Ethics, 95(4), 837-850. https://doi.org/10.1086/292687 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/292687
  74. Westring, A. F., Speck, M. R. M., Sammel, M. D., Scott, M. P., Tuton, L. W., Grisso, J. A., & Abbuhl, S. (2012). A culture conducive to women’s academic success: Development of a measure. Academic medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 87(11), 1622. https://doi.org/10.1097%2FACM.0b013e31826dbfd1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31826dbfd1
  75. Williams, B. (1962). The Idea of Equality', Philosophy. Politics and Society P. Laslett and WG Runciman, Blackwell. 2nd Series. Basil Blackwell. London.
  76. World Health Organisation. (2015) https://apps.who.int/ethics/nationalcommittees/NEC_full_web.pdf

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.