Vol. 12 No. 02 (2024)
Journal Space and Culture, India

Special Articles

Hegemony, Power Structure and Tribal Resistance: A Subaltern Geopolitics View on Mahasweta Devi’s Chotti Munda and His Arrow (2018)

Published 2024-09-27

  • John Vincent
    • ,
  • Devi Meenakshi K

John Vincent
Research Scholar, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vandalur-Kelambakkam Road, Chennai – 600127, Tamil Nadu, India

Devi Meenakshi K
Associate Professor, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vandalur-Kelambakkam Road, Chennai– 600127, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract

Subaltern studies address postcolonial notions, binary oppositions, and power structures, enabling us to perceive history from an oppressed perspective. Similarly, subaltern geopolitics challenges the traditional narratives that often present the interest of the dominant community and omit the marginalised history. It provides perspectives of the dominant group with geographical imaginaries. This article aims to trace hegemony and power structures with geographical imaginaries through the theoretical framework of subaltern geopolitics in Mahaswetha Devi’s Chotti Munda and his Arrow (2018), translated by Gayatri Chakravarti Spivak.  Munda tribes are connected to the land, and the acquisition of land played a pivotal role in the domination and subjugation of the natives. With the subaltern geopolitics, the process of imperialism against the Tribal community during and after the colonisation is studied. Through the lens of hegemony, the cultural exploitation of tribal communities is analysed. It also focuses on the power structure in terms of political and economic structures and elucidates the resistance of the Munda tribal community. The paper identifies three hegemonic power structures that existed during the colonial period, after the colonial period, and in the contemporary period. The article investigates the power structures imposed on Munda tribes through the ownership of the lands and the tribes’ resistance, irrespective of government. The paper brings out the significance of resistance and the importance of land in the lives of tribal people. It concludes that resistance against the authorities is the only means of their survival.

Keywords

Power Structures, Hegemony, Subaltern Geopolitics, Tribes, Munda, Resistance

pdf

References

  1. Angad, A. (2020, December 11). Year on, withdrawal of Pathalgadi Cases Crawls; CM Soren says will Look into it. The Indian Express. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/year-on-withdrawal-of-pathalgadi-cases-crawls-cm-soren-says-will-look-into-it-7112728/
  2. Ashutosh, I. (2019). Postcolonial Geographies and Colonialism’s Mutations: The Geo‐graphing of South Asia. Geography Compass, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12478 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12478
  3. Balakrishnan, S. (2015, April 27). Antonio Gramsci and the Concept of “Hegemony.” Shanlax International Journal of Arts, Science and Humanities. https://shanlaxjournals.in/journals/index.php/sijash/article/view/1311
  4. Bates, T. R. (1975). Gramsci and the Theory of Hegemony. Journal of the History of Ideas, 36(2), 351. https://doi.org/10.2307/2708933 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2708933
  5. Boothman, D. (2008). The Sources for Gramsci’s Concept of Hegemony. Rethinking Marxism, 20(2), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935690801916942 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08935690801916942
  6. Brons, L. (2017). The Hegemony of Psychopathy. Punctum Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.2354026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.2354026
  7. Chakravorty Spivak, G. (2004). Can the Subaltern Speak? In M. Harrison & P. H. Cain (Eds.), Imperialism (pp. 171–219). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003101536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003101536-9
  8. Devi, M. (2018). Chotti Munda and His Arrow (G. Chakravorty Spivak, Trans.). John Wiley & Sons.
  9. Devi, M., & Chanda, I. (1998). “Palamau is a Mirror of India”: An Introduction. In Bitter Soil (4th ed., pp. vii–x). Seagull Books.
  10. El Aidi, A., & Yechouti, Y. (2017). Antonio Gramsci’s Theory of Cultural Hegemony in Edward Said’s Orientalism. Galaxy: International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 6(V), 1–10. https://www.galaxyimrj.com/V6/n5/Abdellatif.pdf
  11. EPW Engage. (2019, October 14). ‘Jal, Jangal aur Jameen:’ The Pathalgadi Movement and Adivasi Rights. Economic and Political Weekly (Engage). https://www.epw.in/engage/article/pathalgadi-movement-nation-autonomy-rights-adivasi-jharkhand
  12. Femia, J. (1975). Hegemony and Consciousness in the Thought of Antonio Gramsci. Political Studies, 23(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1975.tb00044.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1975.tb00044.x
  13. Ferretti, F. (2021). Geopolitics of Decolonisation: The Subaltern Diplomacies of Lusophone Africa (1961–1974). Political Geography, 85, 102326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102326 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102326
  14. Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality: Volume 1: An Introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). Pantheon Books. https://monoskop.org/images/archive/4/40/20170207141717%21Foucault_Michel_The_History_of_Sexuality_1_An_Introduction.pdf
  15. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977 (C. GORDON, Ed.). Pantheon Books, New York. https://monoskop.org/images/5/5d/Foucault_Michel_Power_Knowledge_Selected_Interviews_and_Other_Writings_1972-1977.pdf
  16. Foucault, M. (1988). The Foucauldean Concept of Power. In Chapter 1. https://www.lkouniv.ac.in/site/writereaddata/siteContent/202004021930365629saroj_dhal_socio_FOUCOULT.pdf
  17. Foucault, Michael (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage Books. https://monoskop.org/images/4/43/Foucault_Michel_Discipline_and_Punish_The_Birth_of_the_Prison_1977_1995.pdf
  18. Gill, S. R., & Law, D. (1989). Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital. International Studies Quarterly, 33(4), 475. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600523 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2600523
  19. Gokani, K., & Josan, R. (2015). Challenging the Stereotypes: A Critical Study of Chotti Munda and his Arrow and Sula. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1099096
  20. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. Nowell-Smith, Trans.). International Publishers.
  21. Guha, R. (2016). On Some Aspects of the Historiography of Colonial India. Tracés, 30, 189–201. https://doi.org/10.4000/traces.6478 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/traces.6478
  22. Guha, R. (2021, April 28). Mahasweta Devi and Postmodern Cultural Hegemony. Guha | the Achievers Journal: Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture. https://theachieversjournal.org/index.php/taj/article/view/427
  23. Gündoğan, E. (2008). Conceptions of Hegemony in Antonio Gramsci’s Southern Question and the Prison Notebooks. New Proposals, 2(1), 45–60. http://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/newproposals/article/download/142/236
  24. Kaiwar, V. (2018). Ranajit Guha’s Historiography of Colonial India. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.770 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.770
  25. Khunti. (2019, May 4). Jharkhand: In the Land of Birsa Munda, Tribals will Boycott Polls on May 6. The Indian Express. https://indianexpress.com/elections/jharkhand-lok-sabha-in-the-land-of-birsa-Munda-tribals-to-boycott-polls-on-may-6-5710276/
  26. Martin, J. (2023, January 13). Antonio Gramsci. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/gramsci/#:~:text=He%20employed%20the%20concept%20%E2%80%9Chegemony,a%20ruling%20class%20across%20society.&text=But%20it%20had%20also%20been,society%20(see%20Femia%201981)
  27. Parashar, S. & Toppo, A.O.M. (2018, April 8). Patthalgarhi Challenges the Republic in its own Backyard. The Indian Express. https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/patthalgarhi-jharkhand-challenges-the-republic-in-its-own-backyard-5128458/
  28. Philip, J., Dangwal, R. B., & Balakrishnan, V. (2020). Positioning the Gendered Subaltern: Body, Speech and Resistance in Mahasweta Devi’s Narratives. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 12(5). https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v12n5.rioc1s16n5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v12n5.rioc1s16n5
  29. Ramos, Jr., V. (1982). The Concepts of Ideology, Hegemony, and Organic Intellectuals in Gramsci’s Marxism (P. Saba, Ed.). https://www.marxists.org/history/erol/ncm-7/tr-gramsci.htm#:~:text=According%20to%20Gramsci%2C%20hegemony%20(%E2%80%9C,as%20well%20as%20on%20the
  30. Riley, D. J. (2011). Hegemony, Democracy, and Passive Revolution in Gramsci’s Prison Notebooks. California Italian Studies, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.5070/c322008962 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5070/C322008962
  31. Sarker, S. (2016). A Position Embedded in Identity: Subalternity in Neoliberal Globalization. Cultural Studies, 30(5), 816–838. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2016.1168114 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2016.1168114
  32. Sharp, J. (2011). Subaltern Geopolitics: Introduction. Geoforum, 42(3), 271–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.04.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.04.006
  33. Singh, A. (2019, March 18). Many Faces of the Pathalgadi Movement in Jharkhand. Economic and Political Weekly. https://www.epw.in/journal/2019/11/perspectives/many-faces-pathalgadi-movement-jharkhand.html
  34. Stoddart, M. C. J. (2007). Ideology, Hegemony, Discourse: A Critical Review of Theories of Knowledge and Power. Social Thought and Research. https://doi.org/10.17161/str.1808.5226 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17161/STR.1808.5226
  35. Vacca, Giuseppe (1999). Appuntamenti con Gramsci: introduzione allo studio dei Quaderni del carcere. Roma: Carocci.
  36. Van Dijk, T. A. (1989). Structures of Discourse and Structures of Power. Annals of the International Communication Association, 12(1), 18–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1989.11678711 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1989.11678711

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.