Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 12 No. 1 (2024)
Journal Space and Culture, India

Perspective

A Qualitative Appraisal of the Teaching Methodology Approaches in PhD Coursework

https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v12i1.1418

Published 2024-06-22

  • Ashish Sood
    • ,
  • Girish Sharma
    • ,
  • Jibran Abbas
    • ,
  • Rajat Pandey
    • ,
  • Tejas Nagvenkar

Ashish Sood
Research Scholar, Jagran Lakecity University, Bhopal, India

Girish Sharma
Research Scholar, Jagran Lakecity University, Bhopal, India

Jibran Abbas
Research Scholar, Jagran Lakecity University, Bhopal, India

Rajat Pandey
Research Scholar, Jagran Lakecity University, Bhopal, India

Tejas Nagvenkar
Research Scholar, Jagran Lakecity University, Bhopal, India

Abstract

A comprehensive understanding of research methodologies is necessary to conduct relevant research. Instructing adult scholars is difficult due to their prolonged absence from formal education. To tackle this issue, the university addressed in this paper devised a ‘research methodology’ course specifically designed for those who are employed, including a combination of adult learning principles and traditional teaching methods. An effective evaluation methodology guarantees continuous and fruitful learning. This article provides a qualitative analysis of the technique used by the university to develop research foundations for adult scholars, demonstrating that a blend of andragogy and pedagogy leads to favourable results. Scholars employed management principles to acquire new skills and effectively manage the delicate equilibrium between their professional and personal obligations.

Keywords

Research Methodology, Professional Scholars, Adult Education, Teaching Methodology, Andragogy, Pedagogy, Assessment & Evaluation, Management, Qualitative Analysis

pdf

References

  1. Aycock, D. M., Hayat, M. J., Helvig, A., Dunbar, S. B., & Clark, P. C. (2018). Essential considerations in developing attention control groups in behavioral research. Research in Nursing & Health, 41(3), 320–328. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21870 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21870
  2. Baleni, Z. G. (2015). Online formative assessment in higher education: Its pros and cons. Journal of E-Learning, 13(4), 228–236. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejel/article/view/1730 accessed on 12/5/23.
  3. Charmaz,K.(2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.
  4. Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd ed. ThousandOaks, CA: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
  5. Dascalu, M.I., Nitu, M., Alecu, G., Bodea, C.N., & Moldoveanu, A. D. (2017). Formative assessment application with social media integration using computer adaptive testing techniques. 12th International Conference on e-Learning (ICEL 2017). Florida Orlando, USA: Research Gate.
  6. Elmahdi, I., Al-Hattami, A., & Fawzi, H. (2018). Using technology for formative assessment to improve students’ learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(2), 182–188. http://www.tojet.net/ accessed on 10/4/23.
  7. Estaji, M., & Mirzaii, M. (2018). Enhancing EFL learners' vocabulary learning through formative assessment: Is the effort worth expending? Language Learning in Higher Education, 8(2), 239–264. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2018-0015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2018-0015
  8. Ezzy, D. (2002). Qualitative Analysis: Practice and Innovation. Crows Nest, Australia: Allen &Unwin
  9. Hawe, E., & Dixon, H. (2016). Assessment for learning: a catalyst for student self-regulation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1181–1192. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1236360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1236360
  10. Holmes, G., & Abington-Cooper, M. (2000). Pedagogy vs. andragogy: A false dichotomy? JOTS, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v26i2.a.8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v26i2.a.8
  11. Jarvis, P. (2011). Adult learning: Andragogy versus pedagogy or from pedagogy to andragogy. The Routledge International Handbook of Learning (pp. 154–163). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203357385-23
  12. Jiang, Y. (2014). Exploring teacher questioning as a formative assessment strategy. RELC Journal, 45(3), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214546962 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214546962
  13. Knowles, M. S. (1970). The modern practice of adult education: Andragogy versus pedagogy. Association Press.
  14. Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy. Association Press.
  15. Krathwohl, D. R. (2010). A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
  16. Loeng, S. (2018). Various ways of understanding the concept of andragogy. Cogent Education, 5, 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1496643 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1496643
  17. Martos-Garcia, D., Usabiaga, O., & Valencia-Peris, A. (2017). Students’ perception on formative and shared assessment: Connecting two universities through the blogosphere. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(1), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2017.1.194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2017.1.194
  18. Srivastava, T. K., Mishra, V., & Waghmare, L. S. (2018). Formative Assessment Classroom Techniques (FACTs) for better learning in pre-clinical medical education: A controlled trial. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 12(9), JC01–JC08. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2018/35622.11969 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2018/35622.11969

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.