Vol. 11 No. 4 (2024)
Journal Space and Culture, India

Research

Gendered Disparities in Water and Sanitation through an Intersectional Lens: Emphasising Women’s Perspectives

Published 2024-03-29

  • Sumit Shekhar
    • ,
  • Amrita Dwivedi

Sumit Shekhar
Research Scholar, Department of Humanistic Studies, Indian Institute of Technology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India

Amrita Dwivedi
Assistant Professor, Department of Humanistic Studies, Indian Institute of Technology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India

Abstract

The relationship between gender and water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) has been a widely accepted concern among academicians, activists, and social workers in India, but research and policies focusing on gender and sanitation often fail to address the issue of the intersectionality of identities. Analysing the complex intersection of caste, class, age and gender with water and sanitation in rural India extends new opportunities to explore the complex power dynamics prevalent in society. A focus group study with 54 female participants of seven discussions and in-depth interviews has been conducted in the Hardoi district of Uttar Pradesh to explore the social relations and differences in the physical world within the context of accessibility, affordability, and availability in the water and sanitation sector. Given gendered and other social divisions, we elaborate on how women play an essential role in water and sanitation management in the household. This study also offers evidence of rural women’s experiences of intra-personal, household, and social harassment and violence related to poor or absence of sanitation and water infrastructure due to intersectional social dynamics. We also demonstrate how theorising about a single dimension of social difference ignores the different groups’ access to power, leading to inequality and disparity. 

Keywords

Water, Sanitation, Intersectionality, Identity, Gender, Caste, Focus Groups, In-depth Interviews, Uttar Pradesh, India

pdf

References

  1. Adams, E. A., Byrns, S., Kumwenda, S., Quilliam, R. S., Mkandawire, T., & Price, H. (2022). Water journeys: Household water insecurity, health risks, and embodiment in slums and informal settlements. Social Science & Medicine, 313, 115394.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115394 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115394
  2. Ashraf, S., Kuang, J., Das, U., Shpenev, A., Thulin, E., &Bicchieri, C. (2022). Social beliefs and women’s role in sanitation decision making in Bihar, India: An exploratory mixed method study. PLOS ONE, 17(1), e0262643. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262643 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262643
  3. Atewologun, D. (2018). Intersectionality Theory and Practice. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.48 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.48
  4. Baker, K. K., Story, W. T., Walser-Kuntz, E., & Zimmerman, M. B. (2018). Impact of social capital, harassment of women and girls, and water and sanitation access on premature birth and low infant birth weight in India. PLOS ONE, 13(10), e0205345. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205345
  5. Barrington, D., Sridharan, S., Shields, K. F., Saunders, S. G., & Souter, R. (2017). Sanitation marketing: A systematic review and theoretical critique using the capability approach. Social Science & Medicine, 194, 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.02 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.10.021
  6. Bazaanah, P., &Mothapo, R. A. (2023). Sustainability of drinking water and sanitation delivery systems in rural communities of the LepelleNkumpi Local Municipality, South Africa. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03190-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03190-4
  7. Biswas, C. S., &Mukhopadhyay, I. (2018). Marital status and women empowerment in India. Sociology International Journal, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.15406/sij.2018.02.00030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15406/sij.2018.02.00030
  8. Carrard, N., MacArthur, J., Leahy, C., Soeters, S., &Willetts, J. (2022). The water, sanitation and hygiene gender equality measure (WASH-GEM): Conceptual foundations and domains of change. Women’s Studies International Forum, 91, 102563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2022.102563 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2022.102563
  9. Caruso, B. A., &Sinharoy, S. (2019). Gender data gaps represent missed opportunities in WASH. The Lancet Global Health, 7(12), e1617. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(19)30449-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30449-8
  10. Chowdhury, S., Singh, A., Kasemi, N., &Chakrabarty, M. (2022). Decomposing the gap in intimate partner violence between Scheduled Caste and General category women in India: An analysis of NFHS-5 data. SSM-Population Health, 19, 101189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101189 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101189
  11. Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought in the matrix of domination. In P. H. Collins (Ed.), Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and Politics of Empowerment, 138, 221-238. http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/45a/252.html
  12. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
  13. Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700108086364 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700108086364
  14. Devi, L., & Kaur, M. (2019, October). Purdah or Ghunghat, a Powerful Means to Control Women: A Study of Rural Muslim and Non-Muslim Women in Western Uttar Pradesh, India. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 26(3), 336–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971521519861162 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0971521519861162
  15. Dickin, S., &Gabrielsson, S. (2023). Inequalities in water, sanitation and hygiene: Challenges and opportunities for measurement and monitoring. Water Security, 20, 100143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2023.100143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2023.100143
  16. Dickin, S., Bisung, E., Nansi, J., & Charles, K. (2021). Empowerment in water, sanitation and hygiene index. World Development, 137, 105158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105158
  17. Faure, J. C., Faust, K. M., &Kaminsky, J. (2019). Legitimization of the inclusion of cultural practices in the planning of water and sanitation services for displaced persons. Water, 11(2), 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020359 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020359
  18. Fonseca, A. F., Bandyopadhyay, S., Louçã, J., &Manjaly, J. A. (2019). Caste in the News: A Computational Analysis of Indian Newspapers. Social Media + Society, 5(4), 205630511989605. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119896057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119896057
  19. Goodman, D. J. (2015). Keynote speech at 2014 SIETAR Japan Conference : Oppression and Privilege : Two sides of the same coin. CiNii Research. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1520853833439171328
  20. Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., &Namey, E. E. (2011). Applied Thematic Analysis. Sage Publications. http://tinyurl.com/3trwyjzn DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384436
  21. Gupte, M. (2013). The concept of honour: caste ideology and patriarchy in rural Maharashtra. Economic and Political Weekly, 72-81. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23527311
  22. Hackenbroch, K., & Hossain, S. (2012). “The organised encroachment of the powerful”—Everyday practices of public space and water supply in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(3), 397–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.694265 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2012.694265
  23. Hajra, G., & Dutta, A. (2017). The gap between construction and usage of toilets: An under-identified problem. ARTHANITI: Journal of Economic Theory and Practice, 16(1–2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0976747920170101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0976747920170101
  24. Hankivsky, O., & Grace, D. (2015). Understanding and Emphasizing Difference and Intersectionality in Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research. Oxford Handbooks Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199933624.013.8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199933624.013.8
  25. Hankivsky, O., Reid, C., Cormier, R., Varcoe, C., Clark, N., Benoit, C., &Brotman, S. (2010). Exploring the promises of intersectionality for advancing women’s health research. International Journal for Equity in Health, 9(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-9-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-9-5
  26. Hooks, B. (2000). Feminist Theory. Pluto Press. http://tinyurl.com/mrxbcbdm
  27. Irudayam, A., Mangubhai, J. P., & Lee, J. G. (2012). Dalit Women Speak Out. Zubaan. http://tinyurl.com/2herjpm2
  28. Jadhav, A., Weitzman, A., & Smith‐Greenaway, E. (2016). Household sanitation facilities and women’s risk of non-partner sexual violence in India. BMC Public Health, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3797-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3797-z
  29. Jain, A., Wagner, A., Snell-Rood, C., & Ray, I. (2020). Understanding Open Defecation in the Age of Swachh Bharat Abhiyan: Agency, Accountability, and Anger in Rural Bihar. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4), 1384. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041384
  30. Kayser, G., Rao, N., Jose, R., & Raj, A. (2019). Water, sanitation and hygiene: measuring gender equality and empowerment. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 97(6), 438–440. https://doi.org/10.2471/blt.18.223305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.18.223305
  31. MacArthur, J., Carrard, N., Mott, J., Raetz, S., Siscawati, M., &Willetts, J. (2023). Gender equality approaches in water, sanitation, and hygiene programs: Towards gender-transformative practice. Frontiers in Water, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2023.1090002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2023.1090002
  32. Macura, B., Foggitt, E., Liera, C., Soto, A. E. E., Orlando, A., Del Duca, L., Carrard, N., Hannes, K., Sommer, M., &Dickin, S. (2023). Systematic mapping of gender equality and social inclusion in WASH interventions: knowledge clusters and gaps. BMJ Global Health, 8(1), e010850. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010850 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010850
  33. Malterud, K., Siersma, V., &Guassora, A. D. (2021). Information power: Sample content and size in qualitative studies. In American Psychological Association eBooks (pp. 67–81). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000252-004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0000252-004
  34. Mills, J. E., & Cumming, O. (2016). The impact of WASH on key health & social outcomes—Review of evidence. London and New York: SHARE Consortium and United Nations Children’s Fund. https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2017-07/WASHEvidencePaper_HighRes_01.23.17_0.pdf
  35. Molin, J. (2018). Preventing Gender-Based Violence Post Disasters: Building the capacity of humanitarian actors in the Philippines to engage with men and boys to reduce the risks of perpetration of violence. Retrieved from https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:4607904
  36. Mosse, D. (2018). Caste and development: Contemporary perspectives on a structure of discrimination and advantage. World Development, 110, 422–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.06.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.06.003
  37. Mrudula, A., Callahan, J. L., & Kang, H. (2013). Gender and caste intersectionality in the Indian context. Human Resource Management, 2013, 6(95), 31-48. https://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/34989/
  38. Nagla, B. K. (2020, May 19). Problems of Sanitation in India: Does Culture Matter? Sociological Bulletin, 69(2), 252–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920923221 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920923221
  39. Oláh, L. S., Kotowska, I. E., & Richter, R. (2018). The new roles of men and women and implications for families and societies. In Springer eBooks (pp. 41–64). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72356-3_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72356-3_4
  40. Routray, P., Torondel, B., Clasen, T., & Schmidt, W. P. (2017). Women’s role in sanitation decision making in rural coastal Odisha, India. PLOS ONE, 12(5), e0178042. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178042
  41. ROY, D. (2011). Caste and power: An ethnography in West Bengal, India. Modern Asian Studies, 46(4), 947–974. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0026749x11000680 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X11000680
  42. Saleem, M., Burdett, T., &Heaslip, V. (2019). Health and social impacts of open defecation on women: a systematic review. BMC Public Health, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6423-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6423-z
  43. Scott, J. (2010). Social network analysis: developments, advances, and prospects. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 1(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-010-0012-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-010-0012-6
  44. Scott, P., Sohail, M., &Cavill, S. (2017). Urination needs and practices away from home: Where do women go? In R. J. Shaw (Ed.), Local action with international cooperation to improve and sustain water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) services: Proceedings of the 40th WEDC International Conference, Loughborough, UK, 24-28 July 2017 (pp. 1-6). Paper 2596. https://repository.lboro.ac.uk/ndownloader/files/17228531/1
  45. Smooth, W.G. (2013). Intersectionality from Theoretical Framework to Policy Intervention. In: Wilson, A.R. (eds) Situating Intersectionality. The Politics of Intersectionality. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137025135_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137025135_2
  46. Subedi, M. (2014). Some Theoretical Considerations on Caste. Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, 7, 51–86. https://doi.org/10.3126/dsaj.v7i0.10437 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/dsaj.v7i0.10437
  47. Sultana, F. (2009). Fluid lives: subjectivities, gender and water in rural Bangladesh. Gender, Place & Culture, 16(4), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663690903003942 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09663690903003942
  48. Sultana, F. (2020). Embodied intersectionalities of urban citizenship: water, infrastructure, and gender in the global South. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110(5), 1407–1424. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1715193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1715193
  49. Van de Lande, L., Ghaz, B., &Sanghera, J. (2015). Eliminating discrimination and inequalities in access to water and sanitation. In Eliminating discrimination and inequalities in access to water and sanitation (pp. 56-56). https://www.unwater.org/publications/eliminating-discrimination-and-inequalities-access-water-and-sanitation
  50. Veenstra, G. (2011). Race, gender, class, and sexual orientation: intersecting axes of inequality and self-rated health in Canada. International Journal for Equity in Health, 10(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-10-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-10-3
  51. Weber, N., Patrick, M., Hayter, A., Martinsen, A., &Gelting, R. (2019). A conceptual evaluation framework for the water and sanitation for health facility improvement tool (WASH FIT). Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development, 9(2), 380–391. https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2019.090 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2019.090

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.