Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 11 No. 3 (2023)
Journal Space and Culture, India—Commemoration of the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women

Research

Gender Equality in the Agricultural Sector: Lessons Learned from the Baduy Indigenous Community in Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v11i3.1379

Published 2023-11-27

Mirajiani
Associate Professor, Department of Agribusiness, Faculty of Agriculture, Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University, Jl. Raya Palka KM.03 Sindangsari, Kecamatan Pabuaran, Kabupaten Serang, Provinsi Banten 42163, Indonesia

Abstract

The Baduy people are one of the indigenous communities living in Indonesia at present. The community upholds traditional ways of life based on a customary construction whose application is preserved to date. The study aims to analyse the gender system in the Baduy indigenous community through a qualitative approach, especially in the agricultural field. The research results indicate a division of responsibilities in relation to scope, roles, work, access, control of kinship relationships, marriage patterns, and inheritance patterns between women and men in the community from both productive and domestic perspectives. These differences, however, were not observed to lead to inequality since the system’s value derives from the Baduy community’s cultural construction that guarantees, maintains, and protects gender equality. Moreover, the present study shows us that traditionality is not a factor of gender inequality; traditional cultural constructions have their own mechanisms to create gender equality.

Keywords

Gender, Equality, Agriculture, The Baduy, Indigenous Community, Indonesia

pdf

References

  1. Acosta, M., van Bommel, S., van Wessel, M., Ampaire, E. L., Jassogne, L., & Feindt, P. H. (2019, May). Discursive translations of gender mainstreaming norms: The case of agricultural and climate change policies in Uganda. Women’s Studies International Forum. 74, pp. 9-19. Pergamon. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2019.02.010
  2. Addison, M., Ohene-Yankyera, K., & Mujawamariya, G. (2019). Gender, selected agricultural innovations and intra-household income in Ghana. AgEcon Search, http://ageconsearch.umn.eduaesearch@umn.edu .
  3. Anwar, J., & Muslih, M. (2021). Efektifitas Pikukuh Baduy Tentang Perkawinan Kebal Cerai Bagi Masyarakat Adat Baduy. Madinah: Jurnal Studi Islam. 8(1), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.58518/madinah.v8i1.1331 DOI: https://doi.org/10.58518/madinah.v8i1.1331
  4. Barriteau, E. (2000). Re-examining Issues of" male Marginalisation'and'masculinity'in the Caribbean: The Need for a New Policy Approach. Centre for Gender and Development Studies, University of the West Indies.
  5. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Barriteau%2C+E.+%282000%29.+Reexamining+Issues+of%22+male+Marginalisation%27and%27masculinity%27in+the+Caribbean%3A+The+Need+for+a+New+Policy+Approach.+Centre+for+Gender+and+Development+Studies%2C+University+of+the+West+Indies&btnG=
  6. Bradshaw, S. (2013). Women’s role in economic development: Overcoming the constraints. UNSDSN. https://repository.mdx.ac.uk/item/8569z
  7. Bryceson, D. F. (2019). Gender and generational patterns of African deagrarianization: Evolving labour and land allocation in smallholder peasant household farming, 1980–2015. World Development, 113, 60-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.08.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.08.021
  8. Chant, S and Sweetman, C. (2012). Fixing women or fixing the world? 'Smart economics', efficiency approaches, and gender equality in development. Gender & Development. 20 (3), 517–529. doi:10.1080/13552074.2012.731812. S2CID 154921144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2012.731812
  9. Collins, A. M. (2019). Financialization, resistance, and the question of women’s land rights. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 21(3), 454-476. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2018.1532805 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2018.1532805
  10. Creswell, J.W. (1994). Research Design Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches. Sage Publication. Thousand Oaks. London. New Delhi
  11. Denzin, N.K. & Y.S. Lincoln (eds). (2000). Handbook of Qualitative Research. (Second Edition), Thousand Oaks: Sage Pul. Inc
  12. Dey, S.(2016). New Agriculture, New Knowledge and New Gender Roles: Sharing the Experience of an Indigenous Community. Social Science Review ; The Dhaka University Studies, Part -D, Vol.33, No.2, December 2016
  13. Dore, A. (2021). Menakar Peluang Dan Tantangan Pengakuan Hutan Adat Dalam Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup Dan Kehutaan No. 17/2020 Tentang Hutan Adat Dan Hutan Hak. Jurnal Ilmiah Maju, 4(1), 27-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31258/jip.17.1.27-35
  14. Dudgeon, P., & Bray, A. (2019). Indigenous relationality: Women, kinship and the law. Genealogy, 3(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy3020023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy3020023
  15. Glazebrook, T., & Opoku, E. (2020). Gender and sustainability: Learning from women’s farming in Africa. Sustainability, 12(24), 10483. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410483
  16. Giroud, A., & Huaman, J. S. (2019). Investment in agriculture and gender equality in developing countries. Transnational Corporations, 26(3), 89-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18356/e7a807e6-en
  17. Gebre, G. G., Isoda, H., Rahut, D. B., Amekawa, Y., & Nomura, H. (2021). Gender differences in agricultural productivity: Evidence from maize farm households in southern Ethiopia. GeoJournal, 86(2), 843-864. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-019-10098-y
  18. Husaini, A., & Husni, R. (2015). Problematika Tafsir Feminis: Studi Kritis Konsep Kesetaraan Gender. Al-Tahrir: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 15(2), 367-388. DOI : 10.21154/al-tahrir.v15i2.264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21154/al-tahrir.v15i2.264
  19. Hariharan, V. K., Mittal, S., Rai, M., Agarwal, T., Kalvaniya, K. C., Stirling, C. M., & Jat, M. L. (2020). Does climate-smart village approach influence gender equality in farming households? A case of two contrasting ecologies in India. Climatic Change, 158(1), 77-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2321-0
  20. Jaquette, J. S. (2017). Women/gender and development: the growing gap between theory and practice. Studies in Comparative International Development, 52(2), 242-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-017-9248-8
  21. Kuhnlein, H. V. (2017). Gender roles, food system biodiversity, and food security in Indigenous Peoples’ communities. Maternal & child nutrition, 13, e12529. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12529 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12529
  22. Lope-Alzina, D. G. (2020). Indigenous Women In Agriculture. Routledge Handbook of Gender and Agriculture, 13. Routledge, Oxon OX14 4RN DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199752-31
  23. Lips, Hilary M. (2020). Sex and gender: An introduction. Waveland Press
  24. Lamontagne-Godwin, J., Williams, F. E., Aslam, N., Cardey, S., Dorward, P., & Almas, M. (2018). Gender differences in use and preferences of agricultural information sources in Pakistan. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 24(5), 419-434. http s://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2018.1491870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2018.1491870
  25. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
  26. Moser, C. (2012). Gender planning and development: Theory, practice and training. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203411940
  27. Njieassam, E. E. (2019). Gender inequality and land rights: the situation of indigenous women in Cameroon. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad, Vol 22(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a4907
  28. Noorikhsan, F. F., & Gunawan, H. (2022). Mengkaji Ulang Konsep Kemiskinan Melalui Pendekatan Ekonomi Politik. Journal of Government and Politics (JGOP), 4(2), 133-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jgop.v4i2.10324 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jgop.v4i2.10324
  29. Oakley, A. (2016). Sex, Gender and Society. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315243399
  30. Permana, C.E. (2003). Kesetaraan Gender dalam Adat Inti Jagad Baduy. Wedatama Widya Sastra. Jakarta
  31. Ponthieux, S., & Meurs, D. (2015). Gender inequality. In Handbook of income distribution (Vol. 2, pp. 981-1146). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59428-0.00013-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59428-0.00013-8
  32. Puspitawati, H. (2013). Konsep, teori dan analisis gender. Bogor: Departemen Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen Fakultas Ekologi Manusia Institut Pertanian Bogor.
  33. Pérez Lanza, C. B. (2020). Young Women In Management Positions Additionally, Gender Relations.The Agricultural Sector Of Cienfuegos Province. Case Studies. La ventana. Revista de estudios de género, 6(51), 163-187. https://doi.org/10.32870/lv.v6i51.7057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32870/lv.v6i51.7057
  34. Pankhurst, D., & Jacobs, S. (2019). Land tenure, gender relations, and agricultural production: the case of Zimbabwe’s peasantry. In Agriculture, Women, and Land (pp. 202-227). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429044045-10
  35. Rai, S. M. (2018). Gender and development. In Handbook on the International Political Economy of Gender. Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783478842.00017
  36. Razavi, S and Miller, C. (1995).From WID to GAD: Conceptual shifts in the Women and Development discourse. United Nations Research Institute Occasional Paper series United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/148819
  37. Rola‐Rubzen, M. F., Paris, T., Hawkins, J., & Sapkota, B. (2020). Improving gender participation in agricultural technology adoption in Asia: from rhetoric to practical action. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 42(1), 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13011
  38. Rubin, G. (1975). Sex Gender System. Cambridge University Press
  39. Schoch, K. (2020). Case study research. Research design and methods: An applied guide for the scholar-practitioner, 245-258. Sage Publications
  40. Scott, C. V. (1995). Gender and development: Rethinking modernization and dependency theory. Boulder, CO: L. Rienner Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685853877
  41. Singh-Peterson, L., & Carnegie, M. (2019). Integrating gender in agricultural development initiatives across the South Pacific: Customs, values and intersections. In Integrating Gender in Agricultural Development. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973-055-520191002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973-055-520191002
  42. Somano, T. T. (2022). Assessing the Impacts of Gender Inequality in Agricultural Production: In the Case of Mokonissa Woyge Kebele, Damot Gale Woreda, Wolaita Zone. Social Sciences, 11(1), 22-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20221101.14
  43. Spangler, K., & Christie, M. E. (2020). Renegotiating gender roles and cultivation practices in the Nepali mid-hills: unpacking the feminization of agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values, 37(2), 415-432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-019-09997-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-019-09997-0
  44. Sujana, A. M. (2020). Pikukuh: kajian historis kearifan lokal pitutur dalam literasi keagamaan masyarakat adat Baduy. Historia: Jurnal Pendidik Dan Peneliti Sejarah, 3(2), 81-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/historia.v3i2.24347
  45. Tomalin, E. (2007). Gender studies approaches to the relationships between religion and development. Working Paper. University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. Identification Number/DOI: ISBN: 0704425459/ 9780704425453. http://www.religionsanddevelopment.org/files/resourcesmodule/@random454f80f60b3f4/1202734475_WP8.pdf
  46. United Nations. (1998). Shifting views of women and development. Africa Recovery. United Nations. 11. April 1998. https://www.un.org/ecosoc/en/ev/geninfo/afrec/bpaper/boxseng.htm
  47. United Nations. (2015). Re-Thinking Women's Empowerment and Gender Equality in 2015 and Beyond. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
  48. Vincent , K. (2022). Gender In Agricultural Additionally, Pastoral Livelihoods In Sparc Countries In Sub-Saharan Africa Additionally.The Middle East: A Review. SPARC (Supporting Pastoralism and Agriculture in Recurrent and Protracted Crises. https://www.sparcknowledge.org/sites/default/files/documents/resources/Gender%20in%20agricultural%20and%20pastoral%20livelihoods%20in%20SPARC%20countries%20in%20sub-Saharan%20Africa%20and%20the%20Middle%20East.pdf
  49. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). Sage.https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=FzawIAdilHkC&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=Yin,+R.+K.+(2009).+Case+study+research:+Design+and+methods+(Vol.+5).+Sage.&ots=l_6V2cjUZo&sig=8exCUMtg-n3hj1lVSAGVT_azD3s&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
  50. Yuslin, H. (2021). Pembuktian Strategi Pengarusutamaan Gender (PuG): Analisis Capaian Indeks Pemberdayaan Gender di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Statistik Indonesia, 1(3), 162-170. DOI: 10.11594/jesi DOI: https://doi.org/10.11594/jesi.01.03.04

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.