Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

An Analysis of Thailand’s Social Policies and its Integration with SDG1 “No Poverty” to Achieve Social Inclusion

Abstract

From a historical standpoint, this study examines the concept of poverty in Thailand. The researcher employed the content analysis of eleven effective articles for the study. Thailand’s employability, economy, and poverty have improved during the last three decades because of the introduction of democratic and social security. Innovative poverty-eradication programmes such as conditional cash transfers and noncontributory pensions for the elderly and poor have been included in social protection measures. The social protection system has reduced poverty and begun the process of social inclusion. Thailand’s social policies have not only decreased poverty and fostered social inclusion but also entailed Sustainable Development Goal 1 of poverty eradication in the global scenario. The current study details these achievements, and it appears that Thailand has increased its efforts towards inclusive development and poverty eradication through effective social policy design and implementation.

Keywords

Sustainable Development Goal 1, Social Policy in Thailand, Poverty, Social Inclusion, Social Protection

pdf

References

  1. ASEAN. (2024). Reducing Poverty, Uplifting Lives. https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/The-ASEAN-Issue-no.-36_-Reducing-Poverty-Uplifting-Lives.pdf
  2. Barrientos, A., & Hulme, D. (Eds.). (2008). Social Protection for the Poor and Poorest: Concepts, Policies, and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230583092
  3. Busbarat, P. (2018). Thailand in 2017: Stability without Certainties. Southeast Asian Affairs, 343–362. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26492785 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814786843-021
  4. Duffy, K. (1998). Human dignity and social exclusion. In R. Sykes, R. Alcock, & P. Alcock (Eds.), Developments in European Social Policy: Convergence and Diversity (pp. 1–22). Policy Press.
  5. Mabughi, N., & Selim, T. (2006). Poverty as Social Deprivation: A Survey. Review of Social Economy, 64(2), 181–204. http://www.jstor.org/stable/29770366 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00346760600721122
  6. National Economic and Social Development Council (NESDC). (2023). Economic Report 2023. Office of the Prime Minister.
  7. National Economic and Social Development Board (NESDB). (1967). National Economic and Social Development Plan (1967-71). Office of the Prime Minister.
  8. National Economic and Social Development Board (NESDB). (1972). National Economic And Social Development Plan (1972-76). Office of the Prime Minister.
  9. National Economic and Social Development Board (NESDB). (1977). National Economic And Social Development Plan (1977-81). Office of the Prime Minister.
  10. National Economic and Social Development Board (NESDB). (1982). National Economic and Social Development Plan (1982-86). Office of the Prime Minister.
  11. National Economic and Social Development Board (NESDB). (1987). National Economic and Social Development Plan (1987-91). Office of the Prime Minister.
  12. National Economic and Social Development Board (NESDB). (1992). National Economic and Social Development Plan (1992-96). Office of the Prime Minister.
  13. National Economic and Social Development Board (NESDB). (1997). National Economic and Social Development Plan (1997-2001). Office of the Prime Minister.
  14. National Statistical Office and Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board (NESDB). (n.d.). Economic Report 2023. Office of the Prime Minister.
  15. Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI). (2023). Global Multidimensional Poverty Index 2023: Unstacking. https://ophi.org.uk/sites/default/files/2024-02/GMPI_2023_Unstacking.pdf
  16. Patcharanarumol, W., Pongutta, S., Witthayapipopsakul, W., Viriyathorn, S., & Tangcharoensathien, V. (2018). Thailand. In H. Legido-Quigley & N. Asgari-Jirhandeh (Eds.). Resilient and People-Centred Health Systems: Progress, Challenges and Future Directions in Asia (pp. 346–373). World Health Organization. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep28460.18
  17. Sen, A. (1987). The Standard of Living. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511570742
  18. Sresunt, S. (2011). The Myth of Poverty in Thai Society: The Archaeology of Meaning. South East Asia Research, 19(3), 421–456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5367/sear.2011.0060
  19. Townsend, P., & Abel-Smith, B. (1965). The Poor and the Poorest: A New Analysis of the Ministry of Labour's Family Expenditure Surveys of 1953-54 and 1960. G. Bell& Sons.
  20. United Nations. (2016). Rethinking Poverty: Report on the World Social Situation 2016 [Full report]. https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/rwss/2016/full-report.pdf
  21. United Nations. (2023). Goal 1: No Poverty – Fast Facts. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Goal-1_Fast-Facts.pdf
  22. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2022). Human Development Report 2021-2022. https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/rwss/2016/chapter1.pdf
  23. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2024). Human Development Report 2023-2024. https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/global-report-document/hdr2023-24reporten.pdf
  24. Warr, P. (2006). Poverty and growth in Southeast Asia. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 23(3), 279–302. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41316950 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1355/AE23-3A
  25. Whitton, T. (2000). Measuring poverty. Q/W/E/R/T/Y, 10, 237-246. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01017393f
  26. World Bank. (1996). Thailand’s response to the financial crisis: Economic and social development board project (Report No. 23051-TH). https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/zh/118951468761978758/pdf/multi-page.pdf
  27. World Bank. (2020). Poverty: World Development Report 2020. https://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/149501583303319716/WB-Poverty-Report-Thailand-2020-Low-res.pdf
  28. World Bank. (2024). Thailand - World Bank Data. https://data.worldbank.org/country/thailand?view=chart