Impact of Changing Administrative Boundaries on Development of Uttar and Dakshin Dinajpur Districts, West Bengal

Main Article Content

Sk Ismaile
Namita Chakma

Abstract

Generally, new districts are formed to facilitate administrative expediency or ease of administrative connectivity in a much better way. Often it reduces the distance between the district headquarters and remote areas resulting in easy access to the district headquarters with investing less time and strain. Apparently, it becomes helpful to interact with the beneficiaries in implementing and monitoring the government schemes and programmes in the areas near the district headquarters and remote areas, which is essential for the overall development of a region. In the present study, a meso-level specific comparative analysis has been done at inter and intra district level on the basis of some selected socio-economic indicators (based on Census of India data sources) to understand the impact of reorganisation of the administrative boundaries on the development of Uttar and Dakshin Dinajpur, West Bengal, India.


 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sk Ismaile, & Namita Chakma. (2021). Impact of Changing Administrative Boundaries on Development of Uttar and Dakshin Dinajpur Districts, West Bengal . Space and Culture, India, 9(1), 97-110. https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v9i1.1111
Section
Perspective
Received 2020-10-31
Accepted 2021-06-25
Published 2021-06-25

References

Biswas, K.R. (ed.). (1999). A Summary of the Changes in the Jurisdiction of Districts in West Bengal 1757-1916. Calcutta, WBDG
Blacksell, M. (1974). A new political map for England and Wales. Geoforum, 5(3), 63-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(74)90090-6
Census of India. (1991). District Census Handbook, West Dinajpur.Village and Townwise primary census abstract, West Bengal: Directorate of Census Operations. http://lsi.gov.in:8081/jspui/bitstream/123456789/5328/1/35281_1991_WES.pdf
Census of India. (2011). District Census Handbook, Uttar Dinajpur.Village and Town Directory, West Bengal: Directorate of Census Operations. https://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/DCHB_A/19/1904_PART_A_DCHB_UTTAR%20DINAJPUR.pdf
Census of India. (2011). District Census Handbook, Dakshin Dinajpur.Village and Town Directory, West Bengal: Directorate of Census Operations. https://censusindia.gov.in/2011census/dchb/1905_PART_B_DCHB_DAKSHIN%20DINAJPUR.pdf
Ginsburg, N. (1952). China's Changing Political Geography. Geographical Review, 42(1), 102-117. doi:10.2307/211255
Government of India. (1955) Report of the States Reorganisation Commission. New Delhi: Government Printer.
Helin, R. A. (1967). The volatile administrative map of Rumania. Annals of the Association of American Geographers,57(3), 481-502.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1967.tb00617.x
Hirst, M. (1973). Administrative Reorganization in Uganda: Towards a More Efficient Solution. Area, 5(3), 177-181. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20000749
Krishan, G. (1988). The World Pattern of Administrative Area Reform. The Geographical Journal, 154(1), 93-99. doi:10.2307/633479
Kudaisya, G. (2015). Reorganisation of States in India. New Delhi, National Book Trust.
Narain, P., Bhatia, V.K., & Rai, S.C. (2011). Pattern of Regional Disparities in Socio-economic development inWest Bengal. Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, 65(1), 27-35.
Parmeshwarn, M.P., & Chattopadhyay, S. (2014). A Different Approach; Reorganisation of States. Economic & Political Weekly, 45(42), 81-86. https://www.epw.in/journal/2014/42/notes/reorganisation-states.html
Prakasa Rao, V. L. S. (1984) What is a viable administrative unit? Ann. Nat. Ass. Geogr., India 77-9.
Rao, G.B. (2017). Reorganisation of District in Telegana.Economic& Political Weekly, 52(10), 70-76. https://www.epw.in/search/site/reorganization%20of%20district%20in%20telengana
Singh, M.P. (2008). Reorganisation of States in India. Economic & Political Weekly, 43(11) 70-76. https://www.epw.in/journal/2008/11/special-articles/reorganisation-states-india.html