Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Formation of Cognitive Flexibility as a Basic Competence of the Future Teachers’ Multicultural Personality

Abstract

The article presents the results of research work on the formation of cognitive flexibility (CF) as an essential competence of the future teachers’ multicultural personality. It has been shown that various branches of knowledge (psychology, philosophy, clinical medicine, pedagogy, and others) contribute to the scientific and theoretical substantiation of CF, which is included in the TOP-10 most requested competencies in the XXI century. Based on the analysis of the essence and nature of the future teachers’ multicultural personality, the hypothesis that the competence of CF should become a vital component of personal development was put forward. To test this hypothesis, a pedagogical experiment was organised, which covered 33 future teachers studying "Educational, Pedagogical Sciences" at the Precarpathian National University (Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine). The experiment was conducted in four stages: on the first preparatory stage, a defined program of experimental activities was made; on the second statement stage, the diagnosis of future teachers’ CF levels was set on the basis of the developed prognostic tools (the Questionnaire Cognitive flexibility was created to define the main features of CF as a component of multicultural competence of the future teacher, tests); on the third formative stage the approbation of our methodology for the formation of CF was carried out, which had no analogues in modern education and pedagogy (this was implemented on the basis of our own special course "Cognitive flexibility and multicultural competence of the future teacher", which was held as a training seminar); on the fourth control stage the results of the experiment were determined. They showed that the indicators of CF formation of future teachers at a high level increased from 9.1% to 41.5% (4.7 times), at the medium level they decreased from 63.6% to 53% (1.2 times). At the low level, they changed from 27% to 5.5% (4.9 times) according to four defined criteria (cognitive abilities, adaptive abilities, flexibility of thinking, and emotional flexibility). This proves the effectiveness of the authors’ methodology for the formation of CF as a basic competence of the multicultural personality of the future teacher. It can be widely used in the training of specialists in various specialities.

Keywords

Cognitive Flexibility, Multicultural Competence, Future Teacher, Flexibility of Thinking, Emotional Flexibility

pdf

References

  1. Adler, P. (1977). Beyond Cultural Identity: Reflections on Multiculturalism. (R. Brislin, Ed.). Culture Learning, East-West Center Press, East-West Centre Press. https://www.mediate.com.adler3.
  2. Astakhova, V.I. (2006). Continuing Education in the Context of Educational Reforms in Ukraine: monograph. Kharkov: Publishing House of the NAА.
  3. Boger-Mehall, S.R. (1996). Cognitive Flexibility Theory: Implications for Teaching and Teacher Education. In B. Robin, J. Price, J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.). Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (9th, Washington, DC, March 10-14, 1998). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/46962/
  4. Dashkov, I., & Kurganskij, N. (1995). Group testing of intelligence: the development of a universal technique. Theoretical and applied questions of psychology, 1 (2), (pp. 56-64). https://psyjournals.ru/psyedu/2005/n3/Baturin.shtml
  5. Dufren, T., & Sandoz, E. (2013). Living with Your Body and Other Things You Hate. New Harbinger Publications. https://www.bookdepository.com/Living-with-Your-Body-Other-Things-You-Hate-Emily-K-Sandoz/9781608821044?pdg=dsa-19959388920:cmp
  6. Executive Function Fact Sheet. (2005). Learning Disabilities Executive Function Fact Sheet. Learning Disabilities: (NCLD). www.nsadhd.org › uploads.
  7. Flemming, F. (1996). Transformational Dialogues. Facilitator Training Manual №1. An instruction manual of practical techniques for facilitating personal change. http://www.worldtrans.org/TP/TP1/TP1TOP.HTML
  8. Gippenreiter, Ju. B. (2013). The most important book for parents. Moskov: AST. http://sad54-ptz.ru/inc/sad54/uf/editor/.../samaja_vaznaja_kniga.pdf
  9. Il'in, E. (2009). Psychology of creativity, artistry, giftedness. St-Petereburg: Piter. http://parksgt.tsu.ru/upload/iblock/aa9/aa9d04efbc67703011c9623eb383db15.pdf
  10. Kalugin, R. (2006). Laws of the famous people https://eragozina.nethouse.ru/static/doc/0000/0000/0018/18848.lw1ycut0q1.pdf
  11. Kholodnaya, M. (2004). Cognitive styles. About the nature of the individual mind. St-Petereburg: Piter. http://www.ipras.ru/cntnt/rus/media/on-layn-bibliote/knigi1/holodnaya_2.html
  12. Leber, A. B., Turk-Browne, N. B., & Chun, M. M. (2008). Neural predictors of moment-to-moment fluctuations in cognitive flexibility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 36. 10.1073/pnas.0805423105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805423105
  13. Marginson, S., & Sawir, E. (2012). Ideas for Intercultural Education. Palgrave Macmillan US. 237 р. https://doi.10.1057/9780230339736 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230339736
  14. Markmen, A. (2014). Rational changes. Minsk: Poppuri. http://padabum.com/d.php?id=206517
  15. Martin, M. M., & Rubin, R. B. (1995). A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psychological Reports, 76(2), 623-626. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.76.2.623 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.76.2.623
  16. Miyake, А., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, А., & Wager T.D. (2000). The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex "Frontal Lobe" Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49-100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
  17. Moshnjaga, E. (2017). On the formation of a multicultural educational space in a university. Herald RTMAT, 1, 70-75. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-voprosu-o-formirovanii-multikulturnogo-obrazovatelnogo-prostranstva-v-vuze
  18. Practical psychodiagnostics. Methods and Tests. (2006). Samara: ID BAHRAH-M.
  19. Scott, W.A. (1962). Cognitive Complexity and Cognitive Flexibility. Sociometry, 25(4), 405-414. https://doi.org/10.2307/2785779 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2785779
  20. Shapiro, D. (1981). Autonomy and rigid character. New York: Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0085135 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0085135
  21. Slastenin, V., & Palatkina, G. (2004). Ethnopedagogical factors of multicultural education. Moskov https://www.dissercat.com/content/etnopedagogicheskie-faktory-multikulturnogo-obrazovaniya
  22. Spiro, R. J., Collins, B. P., & Ramchandran, A. R. (2007). Modes of openness and flexibility in cognitive flexibility hypertext learning environments. In B. Khan, (Ed.), Flexible learning in an information society, (pp. 18-25). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.10.4018/978-1-59904-325-8.ch002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-325-8.ch002
  23. Spiro, R.J., Feltovich, P.J., Jacobson, M. & Coulson, R.L. (1991). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism аnd hypertext: advanced knowledge acquisition in the structured domains. Educational Technology, 31(5), 24-33. https://tinyurl.com/y48k5yp9
  24. Global Challenge Insight (2016). Report. The Future of Jobs Employment, Skills and Workforce Strategy for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. https://www.eduget.com.
  25. Vem, A. (2010). Don’t let you be cheated! Sign language: what Paul Ekman kept silent about. St-Petereburg: Piter. https://www.labirint.ru/books/237740/
  26. World Economic Forum (2020). https://www.sncmedia.ru.