Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Vol. 7 No. 3 (2019)
Space and Culture, India

Special Articles

Seven Aspects of the Great Steppe in the Modern Kazakh Prose – the National Conception of Eternal Nation and Art Discourse

https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v7i3.468

Published 2019-11-25

  • Aigul Ismakova
    • ,
  • Nurdaulet Akysh
    • ,
  • Ainur Akhmetova
    • ,
  • Almira Kaliyeva
    • ,
  • Shokhan Shortanbayev

Aigul Ismakova
Institute of literature and art named after M.O. Auezov

Nurdaulet Akysh
Institute of literature and art named after M.O. Auezov

Ainur Akhmetova
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University

Almira Kaliyeva
Institute of literature and art named after M.O. Auezov

Shokhan Shortanbayev
Institute of literature and art named after M.O. Auezov

Abstract

This research aims to identify the role and place of the ideological concepts of the “Eternal Nation” and “The Great Steppe” in Kazakh literature.

For this, it uses methods of stylistic analysis of literary works from the perspective of identifying communication symbols in prose. Additional research methods are the method of historical analysis of the ideological concepts formation and a cross-disciplinary approach to the interpretation of the content of works.

The reasons for the strong influence of these concepts on the culture of modern Kazakhstan are justified. A symbol code is discovered through which writers reflected the state of public life in Kazakhstan.

The research is one of the first attempts to review and analyse the stories of Kazakh literature published in the 21st century. The stories are specially classified in the thematic and content context, the scientific conclusions for the artistic world of the works, language and style features of the works are presented, whereby the authors of the study set a precedent for systematising disparate knowledge of modern Kazakh literature.

PDF

References

  1. Abdikuly, T. (2009). Parasat maidany. Astana: Foliant, pp. 88.
  2. Abzhanov, Kh. (2016). Mangilik Yel ideasy zhane tauelsiz Kazakhstan zholy. Retrieved from: https://e-history.kz/kz/publications/view/2590
  3. Abzhanov, Kh. (2014). Qazaqstan: ulttyq tarih, idea, metodologia (pp. 328). Almaty: Eltanym.
  4. Balpanov, N., Ismagambetova, Z., Karabayeva, A., Mirzabekova, A., & Rysbekova, S. (2018). The problem of religious tolerance in Kazakhstan: Past and present. Space and Culture, India, 6(2), 17-33. doi: 10.20896/saci.v6i2.318 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v6i2.318
  5. Beissinger, M. R. (2002). Nationalist mobilization and the collapse of the Soviet State. Cambridge University Press. Eleukenov, Sh. (2006). Qazaq adebieti tauelsizdik kezenginde. Almaty, Alatau, pp. 352.
  6. Burns, L. (2019). Postcolonialism after world literature (pp. 264). Bloomsbury Academic.
  7. Dawes, J. (2018). The novel of human rights (pp. 240). Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674986459
  8. Kesici, Ö. (2017). The Alash movement and the question of Kazakh ethnicity. Nationalities Papers, 45(6), 1135-1149. doi: 10.1080/00905992.2017.1320541 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2017.1320541
  9. Kirsch, A. (2017). The global novel: Writing the world in the 21st century (pp. 105). Columbia Global Reports.
  10. Kiynova, Z. K. K., Sansyzbayeva, S. K., Akhmetzhanova, A. I., Mussabekova, U. E., & Muratbayeva, I. S. (2018). Kazakhstan realities in the perception of representatives of American Ethnolinguoculture. Space and Culture, India, 6(3), 71-81. doi: 10.20896/saci.v6i3.370 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v6i3.370
  11. Kristeva, Yu. (2004). Jest: praktika ili kommunikatsia? Izbrannye trudy: Razrushenie poetiki. M.
  12. Melekhova, K. A., Lichman, Y. Y., Erkin, Z., Raimbergenov, A. I., & Sagimbayev, A. A. (2018). The role of Central Asian traditions in Mongolian Fine Arts. Space and Culture, India, 6(3), 61-70. doi: 10.20896/saci.v6i3.372 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v6i3.372
  13. Qazaq romany: otkeni men bugini: Uzhymdyk monografia. (2009) (pp. 664) Almaty: Almaty.
  14. Sailaubaikyzy, B. G., Alibiuly, K. M., & Kabykenovich, S. A. (2018). The comparative analysis of Kazakh and Polish dramatic works. Space and Culture, India, 6(2), 55-64. doi: 10.20896/saci.v6i2.339 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v6i2.339
  15. Sarbassova, G. (2015). Language and identity in Kazakh horse culture*/Kazak At Kültüründe Dil ve Bilinç. Bilig, 75, 227.
  16. Sharipova, D. S., Yespenova, A. T., Kobzhanova, S. Z., & Yergaliyeva, R. A. (2018). Tendencies in women's painting in Kazakhstan in the context of self-identification. Space and Culture, India, 6(2), 113-120. doi: 10.20896/saci.v6i2.361 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v6i2.361
  17. Smith, A. (2010). Nationalism: Theory, ideology, history (pp. 25-30). Polity.
  18. Tarazi, A. (2008). Mustafa Shokay (pp. 382). Almaty: Zhazushy.
  19. Tsapko, M. I., Valyarovskiy, F. I., Maiboroda, E. T., Khusainova, E. N., & Varnavskaya, O. O. (2018). Language identity as a unifying identity: Linguistic, ethnopolitical and international legal aspects. Space and Culture, India, 6(2), 121-129. doi: 10.20896/saci.v6i2.360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v6i2.360

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.