Main Article Content
The early reception of Bernard Shawâ€™s creativity is of considerable interest since it helps to characterise Russian-English historical, cultural and literary connections better, being an indicator of the impact of the aesthetics and drama by B. Shaw on creating a new drama and the development of Russian theatrical art. The research aims to examine the specific perception of the creativity of the English playwright B. Shaw by K.I. Chukovsky. The focus was mostly on the article Bernard Shaw from the series of Anglo-American notebooks, which analyses the works of the English playwright, as well as his aesthetic views, are fragmented. Thus, K.I. Chukovsky paid much attention to the ideological position of B. Shaw, which social-reformist trends in a society strongly influenced formation. In particular, he noted that the adoption of socialism by B. Shaw was slightly mental than emotional, correlated with the features of the social processes that were taking place. The article contained K.I. Chukovskyâ€™s analysis of reviews of A.V. Lunacharsky on the works of B. Shaw and the statements of M. Gorky about paradoxes in English literature, fully characterising the attitude of social thought in Soviet Russia to the artistic legacy of the English playwright. It also reveals the specific understanding of the influence of creativity of G. Ibsen on theatrical innovations and aesthetic beliefs of B. Shaw, reflected in the essay Quintessence of Ibsenism. The role of the discussion as a structure-forming element in B. Shawâ€™s dramaturgy is defined. Notes on individual plays by B. Shaw, presented in the works of K.I. Chukovsky, show that the plays of the playwright were accepted in the Russian cultural consciousness and were perceived in the light of the current social and literary trends.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Chukovsky, K.I. (2012). Collected Works, In 15 vols. Contemporaries; Application Comp., comment. By E. Chukovskaya (vol. 5, pp. 480). Moscow, TERRAâ€“Book Club.
Chukovsky, K.I. (1922). Back to Methuselah: [Play by B.Show]. Contemporary West, 1, 170.
Chukovsky, K.I. (2012). Collected Works: In 15 vol. High Art; From the Anglo-American notebooks, Comp. by E. Chukovskaya and P. Kryuchkov (vol. 3, pp. 640). Moscow. TERRAâ€“Book Club.
Chukovsky, K.I. (2013). Collected works, In 15 vol. Diary of 1901â€“1921. Foreword. V. Kaverin; Comments. E. Chukovskaya (vol. 11, pp. 592). Moscow, TERRAâ€“Book Club.
Chukovsky, K.I. (2013). Collected works, In 15 vols. The Diary (1936â€“1969). Comments by E. Chukovskaya (vol. 13, pp. 640). Moscow, TERRAâ€“Book Club.
Chukovsky, K.I. (2013). Collected works, In 15 vols. The Diary (1922â€“1935). Comments by E. Chukovskaya (vol. 12, pp. 656). Moscow, TERRAâ€“Book Club.
Clare, D. (2016). Shaw and the Stage Englishman in Irish Literature. In Bernard Shawâ€™s Irish Outlook (pp. 67-121). Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Holroyd, M. (2015). Bernard Shaw: The New Biography. Head of Zeus.
Kent, B. (2015). George Bernard Shaw in Context. Cambridge University Press.
Krivonogova, S.A. (2001). Left Fabianism: social ideas and views into the future (pp. 97).. Magnitogorsk, MSU.
Lunacharsky, A.V. (1957). Articles about literature (pp. 732).. Moscow, State Literature Publishing House.
MartÃn, G. A. R. (2017). Introduction: Shaw and Classical Literatureâ€”What You See Is Not Always What You Get. Shaw, 37(1), 1-10.
Watt, S. (2018). Introduction: On Money, Psychology, and Affect in Bernard Shawâ€™s Writing. In Bernard Shawâ€™s Fiction, Material Psychology, and Affect (pp. 1-41). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Watt, S. (2018). Bernard Shawâ€™s Fiction, Material Psychology, and Affect: Shaw, Freud, Simmel. Springer.
Zhatkin, D.N., Futlyaev, N.S., Aksenov, I.A., & Meyerhold, V.E. (2015). An unpublished translation of the play Â«Heartbreak HouseÂ» by B.Shaw and its stage edition (based on RGALI materials) (pp. 330â€“427). Art translation and comparative literary criticism. III: Collection of scientific papers. Managing Editor D.N. Zhatkin. Moscow, Flint; Science.