A Model of the Civil Participation in the Context of the Specificities of the Political Space of the Russian Federation’s Regions

  • Irina Aleksandrovna Batanina Institute of Humanitarian and Social Sciences, Federal State Educational Establishment of Higher Education “Tula State University”, Tula, Russia
  • Anastasiya Aleksandrovna Lavrikova Institute of Humanitarian and Social Sciences, Federal State Educational Establishment of Higher Education “Tula State University”, Tula, Russia
  • Sergey Aleksandrovich Pukhanov Institute of Humanitarian and Social Sciences, Federal State Educational Establishment of Higher Education “Tula State University”, Tula, Russia
  • Olga Evgenievna Shumilova Evgenievna Shumilova Institute of Humanitarian and Social Sciences, Federal State Educational Establishment of Higher Education “Tula State University”, Tula, Russia
Keywords: A Model of the Civil Participation, Political Space, Russian Federation’s Regions

Abstract

The structure of political opportunities was the study basis for determining the type of civil subjectivity based on the parameters of political competence (awareness) of the population living in the regions of Russia. The representatives of the expert groups from Belgorod region, Moscow region, the city of Moscow, Bryansk region, Vladimir region, Voronezh region, Lipetsk region, Orel region, Ivanovo region, Ryazan region, Yaroslavl region, Kostroma region, Tambov region, Tver region, Tula region took part in the research. This study has enabled the researchers to determine the preferred model of the political participation for each type of the region in the Russian Federation.Consequently, to suggest for recommendations, which will help to synchronise the structure of the political opportunities with the parameters of constructive political participation, which will lead to increasing the consolidation of the elite and mass groups and to deradicalisation of political interactions. It was proved, that it could be methodologically justified to view the category “political participation†in connection with the category “political activityâ€. On the basis of the main attributes of the activity, an operationalisation of the concept of “political participation†was conducted.

Taking into account that the regions of the Russian Federation even within the boundaries of one Federal District differ from each other in levels of social and economic development, “structure of political possibilitiesâ€, types of the elite and mass value systems, the forms, directivity and effectiveness of the local initiatives also vary considerably. The complex research enabled the authors to verify the validity of the conclusions. The research employed a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods.

The results of the expert survey demonstrated that the specificity of any form of political participation is determined by several factors: the political context, the social context, culture, a historical process and a level of political consciousness.

References

Brady, H. (1999). Political Participation: Measures of Political Attitudes. Wrightsman. San Diego: Academic Press.

Dalton, R. (2009). The Good Citizen: How A Younger Generation Is Reshaping American Politics. Revised Edition. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Della Porta, D. and Diani, M. (1999). Social Movements: An Introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Ekman, J. and Amnå, E. (2009). Political Participation and Civic Engagement: Towards A New Typology. Youth & Society (YeS). Working Paper. No. 2

Koopmans, R. (1995). Democracy from Below.New Social Movements and the Political System in West Germany. Boulder: Westview Press.

Lane, D.S. Dal Cin, S. V. (2018). Sharing beyond Slacktivism: the effect of socially observable prosocial media sharing on subsequent offline helping behavior. Information Communication and Society, Vol. 21, Issue 11: 1523-1540

Macedo, S. (2005). Democracy at Risk: How Political Choices Undermine Citizen Participation, and What We Can Do About It. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

McAdam, D., McCarthy, J.D., Zald, M.N. (2004). Comparative perspectives on social movements: political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Scharpf, F. (2000).Institutions in Comparative Policy Research.Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 33: 783-784.

Stoker, G. (2006). Why Politics Matters: Making Democracy Work. Palgrave Macmillan.

Wang, T. and Shen, F. (2018). Perceived party polarization, news attentiveness, and political participation: a mediated moderation model. Asian Journal of Communication, Vol. 28, Issue 6: 620-637

Warren, M.E. (2011). Exit-based Empowerment in Democratic Theory. American Political Science Review, Vol. 105: 683-701.

Xue, T. and van Stekelenburg, J. (2018).When the Internet meets collective action: The traditional and creative ways of political participation in China.Current Sociology, Vol. 66, Issue 6: 911-928

Published
2018-11-22
How to Cite
Aleksandrovna Batanina, I., Aleksandrovna Lavrikova, A., Aleksandrovich Pukhanov, S., & Evgenievna Shumilova, O. E. S. (2018). A Model of the Civil Participation in the Context of the Specificities of the Political Space of the Russian Federation’s Regions. Space and Culture, India, 6(3), 82-96. https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v6i3.394