Park, People and Biodiversity Conservation in Kaziranga National Park, India

Main Article Content

Daisy Das

Abstract

Kaziranga National Park (henceforth, KNP) is a protected area situated in the North Eastern part of India. The park is a World Heritage Site and has a very rich ecosystem. KNP is an attractive tourist destination and occupies a significant place in the life and culture of the people living in this part of the country. Conservation of the park started more than a century ago, and local people have often contested such efforts. This is mainly because indigenous people have been facing displacement and deprivation from resources, which they have been using for centuries. Besides deprivation, wild animals often damage their properties and paddy fields. This leads to resentment among local people and become potential cause of grudge in the form of encroachment, poaching, biodiversity loss, and excessive collection of forest products. As a result, conservation measures may fail to deliver desired outcome. This paper tries to examine the gains and losses for living around KNP and assess the park-people relation. We conduct a case study in some periphery villages of the park and find that people have been suffering from difficulty in rearing livestock and loss caused by wild animal. However, people gain from tourism business. Based on the findings we recommend extension of tourism/allied activities and community welfare measures. The findings may be used to derive policy implication for sustainable management of the park.

Article Details

How to Cite
DAS, Daisy. Park, People and Biodiversity Conservation in Kaziranga National Park, India. Space and Culture, India, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 1, p. 36-48, june 2017. ISSN 2052-8396. Available at: <http://spaceandculture.in/index.php/spaceandculture/article/view/244>. Date accessed: 22 sep. 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.20896/saci.v5i1.244.
Keywords
Kaziranga National Park, Protected Area, Eco Development Committee, Resentment, Tourism, Livelihood, Assam, India
Section
Research

References

Adam, W.M.,& Hutton, J. (2007). People, Parks and Poverty: Political Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation. Conservation and Society, 5(2), 147-83.
Agrawal, A.,& Redford, K. (2006). Poverty, Development and Biodiversity Conservation: Shooting in the Dark, WP 26, Wildlife Conservation Society. Available at http://www.wcs.org (accessed on April 22, 2017).
Ambedker,B.R. (1916). Caste in India, Their Mechanism, Genesis and Development. Patrika Publication, Punjab (India). Available at www.archieve,org/details/castesinIndia035140mbp (accessed on June13, 2017).
Albers, H. J.,& Robinson, E.J.Z.(2007). Spatial-temporal Aspects of Cost-benefit Analysis for Park Management: An Example from Khao Yai National Park. Thailand Journal of Forest Economics, 13,129–150.
Al-Sayed, M.,& Al-langawi, A. (2003). Biological Resources Conservation through Ecotourism Development. Journal of Arid Environment, 54, 225–23.
Arjunan, M., Holmes, C.,Puyravaud, J.P.,& Davidar, P. (2006). Do Developmental Initiatives Influence Local Attitudes towardConservation? A Case Study from the Kalakad–Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve, India. Journal of Environmental Management, 79, 188–197.
Booker, F.,& Roe, D. (2017). First Line of Defence? A Review of Evidence on The Effectiveness of Engaging Communities to Tackle Illegal Wildlife Trade. Available atwww.iied.org (accessed on April 22, 2017).
Brockington, D., Igoe, J., & Soltau, K. S. (2006). Conservation, Human Rights, and Poverty Reduction. Conservation Biology, 20, 205-252.
Buhler, G. (undated). Manusmriti: The Laws of Manu, 1500BC. Available atwww.hindubooks.org/manusmriti.pdf (accessed on June 13, 2017)
Das, A.F.,& Sikdar, M. (2010). Opportunity for Natural Selection among Some Selected Population Groups of Northeast India, Indian J Hum Genet, 16(2), 61–66.
Das, D.,& Hussain, I. (2016). Does Ecotourism Affect Economic Welfare? Evidence from Kaziranga National Park, India. Journal of Ecotourism, 15, 241-260.
Das, D. (2015). Conflict or Conservation: A Roadmap for Management of Kaziranga National Park, Working Paper, 15-02. Available at www.shsu.edu (accessed on 09 January 2017).
DFID (1999).Sustainable Livelihood Guidance Sheets. Department for International Development. Available at http://www.eldis.org(accessed on April 2017).
Dixon, J. A.,& Sherman,P. B. (1991). Economics of Protected Areas. Ambio 20(2): 68-74.
Durbarry, R. (2004). Tourism and Economic Growth: The Case of Mauritius. Tourism Economics10, 389-401.
Gillingham, S.,& Lee, P.C. (1999). The Impact of Wildlife-related Benefits on the Conservation Attitude of Local People around the Selous Game Reserve, Tanzania. Environment Conservation, 26(3),218–228.
GLOPP (2008). DFID’s Sustainable Livelihoods Approach and its Framework. Available at http://www.glopp.ch (accessed on April 23, 2017).
Gossling, S. (1999). Ecotourism: A Means to Safeguard Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functions. Ecological Economics 29, 303–320.
Hedge, R.,& Enters. T. (2000). Forest Products and Households Economy: ACase Study from Mudumalai Wildlife Sanctuary, Southern India. Environmental Conservation 27(3),250–259.
Hussain, S.A., Barthwal, S.C., Badola, R., Rahman, S. M. T., Rastogi, A., Tuboi, C.,& Bhardwaj, A.K. (2012). An Analysis of Livelihood Linkages of Tourism in Kaziranga National Park, ANatural World Heritage Site in India. Parks, 18(2),32-43.
Hussain, S.S., Giffin, A.W., Moran, D., Robinson, L.A., Fofana, A., & Paramor,O.A.L. (2010). An Ex Ante Ecological Economic Assessment of the Benefits Arising from Marine Protected Areas Designation in the UK. Ecological Economics, 69(4),828-838.
IIED (2015). Conservation, Crime and Communities: Case Studies of Efforts To Engage Local Communities in Tackling Illegal Wildlife Trade. Available at www.iied.org (accessed on April 23, 2017).
Job, H.,& Paesler, F. (2013). Links between Nature-based Tourism, Protected Areas, Poverty Alleviation and Crises:The Example of Wasini Island (Kenya). Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 1-2,18– 28.
Kala, C.P.,& Maikhuri, R. K. (2011). Mitigating People-park Conflicts on Resource Use through Ecotourism: A Case of the Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, Indian Himalaya. Journal of Mountain Science, 8, 87-95.
Kiss, A. (2004). Is Community-based Ecotourism a Good Use of Biodiversity Conservation Funds. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 232-237.
Linkie, M., Y. Dinata, A. Nofrianto,& Leader-Williams, N. (2007). Patterns and Perceptions of Wildlife Crop Raiding In and Around Kerinci Seblat National Park, Sumatra. Animal Conservation, 10,127–135.
Lopes, A. A. (2014).Civil Unrest and the Poaching of Rhinos in the Kaziranga National Park, India. Ecological Economics, 103, 20–28.
Mackenzie, C.A.,& Ahabyona, P. (2012). Elephants in the Garden: Financial and Social Costs of Crop Raiding. Ecological Economics, 75, 72-82.
Mathur, V., Verma, A., Dudley, N., Stolton, S., Hockings, M.,& James, R.(2007). Kaziranga National Park and World Heritage Site, India: Taking the Long View, in World Heritage Reports 21 – World Heritage Forests, UNESCO, Paris. Available athttp://whc.unesco.org (accessed on November 11, 2014).
Medhi, A.,& Saha, A.K. (2014). Land Cover Change and Rhino Habitat Mapping of Kaziranga National Park, India in M. Singh et al. (eds) Climate Change and Biodiversity: Proceedings of IGU Rohtak Conference-I. Available at https://www.academia.edu (accessed on April 27, 2016).
Mirsanjari, M. M., Molla, M. A., Zarekare, A.,& Ghorbani, S. (2013). Environmental Impact Assessment of Ecotourism Site’s Values. Advances in Environmental Biology, 7, 248-252.
Nepal, S. K. (2000). Tourism in Protected Areas: The Nepalese Himalaya. Annals of Tourism Research 27(3), 661-681.
Nyaupane, G. P.,& Poudel, S. (2011). Linkages among Biodiversity, Livelihood, and Tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(4),1344-1366.
Ogra, M. V. (2008). Human–wildlife Conflict and Gender in Protected Area Borderlands: A Case Study of Costs, Perceptions, and Vulnerabilities from Uttarakhand (Uttaranchal), India.Geoforum, 39,1408–1422.
Rishi,P.S., Moghe, S.,&Upadhay, B. K. (2008). Analysis of Hierarchy of Needs and Motivational Strategies for Eco-development Planning in Two National Parks of India Resources. Conservation and Recycling, 52, 707–718.
Saikia, A. (2009). The Kaziranga National Park: Dynamics of Social and Political History, Conservation and Society, 7 (2),113-129.
Saikia, A.(2011). Kaziranga National Park: History, Landscape and Conservation Practices. Economic and Political Weekly, XlVI (32),12-13.
Sebele, L.S. (2010). The Social Impacts of Community-based Tourism: ACase Study of Khama Rhino Sanctuary Trust in the Central District of Botswana (Master’s thesis). University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. Available at http://wiredspace.wits.ac.za (accessed on November 15, 2014).
Shah, A. 2007. Management of Protected Areas: Exploring an Alternative in Gir. Economic and Political Weekly, 14, 2923-30.
Shrestha, R. K.,&Alavalapati, J.R.R. (2006). Linking Conservation and Development: An Analysis of Local People’s Attitude towards Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 8,69–84.
Shrivastava, R. J.,& Heinen. J.T. (2007). Implications for Conservation and Development Planning: AMicrosite Analysis of Resource Use around Kaziranga National Park. The Journal of Environment Development, 16,207-226.
Shyamsundar, P.,& Krammer, R. (1997). Biodiversity Conservation: At What Cost? A Study of Households in the Vicinity of Madagaskar’s Mantadia National Park.Ambio,26(3),180-184.
Sims, K.R.E. (2010). Conservation and Development: Evidence from Thai Protected Areas.Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 60,94–114.
Stankov, U., Stojanovic, V., Dragicevic, V., & Arsenovic, D. (2011). Ecotourism:An Alternative to Mass Tourism in Nature Park Stara Planina. Journal of the Geographical Institute, 61, 43-59.
Thapa, S.,& Chapman, D. S. (2010). Impacts of Resource Extraction on Forest Structure and Diversity in Bardia National Park, Nepal. Forest Ecology and Management, 259 (3),641-649.
Vedeld, P., Angelsen, A.,Bojo, J.,Sjaastad, E.,&Kobugab, G.K. (2012). Protected Areas, Poverty and Conflicts: A Livelihood Case Study of Mikumi National Park, Tanzania. Forest Policy and Economics, 21, 20–31.